Are we missing an opportunity with our narrative on Climate Change?
I've written about climate change and my views of the current narrative and global push. This time I am actually writing from a very different perspective.
We are being told to be afraid of Anthropogenic (i.e. man-made) Climate Change.
We want the impact of mankind to ultimately have no impact on the climate. This is unrealistic though we could minimize our impact. I've also written about how our response to this fear could actually do more to anthropogenically change the climate than the thing we claim to be fighting. I've said before. If we have a fear of CO2 in the atmosphere and we keep developing more and more ways to pull CO2 out of the atmosphere we are in danger of browning the planet as we pull the molecules that plants need to survive out of the atmosphere.
Those things have been discussed before. Let me get into the new thought.
Perhaps we should change the climate
Our technological advancement is in a constant state of acceleration at the moment. Though there is a very real chance that the cultural and propagandist direction we are being bashed with daily could lead to that advancement coming to a screeching halt. We have the very real potential of experiencing a new dark age. Time will tell, and it is my hope it does not occur.
In this post I want to from this point forward operate from the position of imagining what we can do if this dark age does not occur.
We could engineer the climate to be beneficial to life beyond simply letting the planet do it. For example: adding more CO2 to the atmosphere than we currently have would have negligible effect on the temperature of the planet but it would vastly improve the ability of the planet to become green and grow more plant life. This in turn would generate more oxygen. In the event the planet did heat some more that is not a bad thing either. We are still coming out of an ice age and are not as warm as the planet has been most of its existence. The oceans would rise if the temperature increased and the ice melted. Why does that matter? People don't want to lose their property and they want to continue to live by the coast lines. They want the world to remain as it is.
Yet what if we plan for the concept that the seas are going to rise. We could either do the Netherlands type approach and do a dike system in some places to help with this. We could also not be so fixated on being able to live by the coasts. It is a luxury and we are demanding existence not threaten our luxuries.
We could do vertical and indoor growing on a large scale right now and there literally is no reason for any kind of hunger. We have the technological know how to address such things right now. We simply need to do it.
There really are only a couple things preventing this:
- Corporations that are soaking us for the profit for their products that we might no longer need.
- Governments blocking things that might threaten the corporations they are collaborating with. (Fascism/Cronyism - happens in Communist, Socialist, and Capitalist nations)
- Politicians blocking and advancing things for their own personal benefit after they've made it difficult to hold them accountable for any misdeeds.
- Propaganda making people afraid and using that fear to herd the population into a desired direction the three points above want it to go. To benefit them.
Perhaps we should be changing the climate. What can we do to make the planet support even more life? Instead of trying to keep it unchanged, can we actually improve it?
I can tell you now that actually improving it would be a very different direction from the so-called fear porn climate change narrative being followed today.
(Image Source: thriveglobal.com)
Some hope...
Many months ago I saw a video on naturalnews.com about growing food in containers with no soil that has amazing potential and produces exceptional growth. The video I saw showed you how to build such things out of plastic bins and containers. Today I discovered Eden Grow Systems which is offering more engineered ways of doing this with battery backup and more. They are basing it off of techniques pioneered in NASA. It is similar though to what was being done in that Natural News video just on a much more professional approach. It also is a lot more expensive.
(Image Source: Eden Grow Systems)
I think what it shows you though is that we do have a way to address food problems pretty much anywhere on the planet. Any scarcity we have anywhere now is by design.
Image Source: Eden Grow Systems)
Image Source: Eden Grow Systems)
(Image Source: io9.com)
Governments like scarcity. It gives them an avenue to manipulate and control the people. This is true whether it is capitalist, communist, or socialist based. Those still all involve centralization and people who get to make the decisions for everyone else. That is where cronyism and by extension fascism occurs. Those benefitting from the cronyism love it when we throw all our efforts into blaming everything on capitalism, communism, or socialism because when we are divided and fixated on each other over ideological differences they can poke and prod us to keep us going directions they want. Those directions keep an elite class in power. They keep the rest of us indentured/enslaved likely without even realizing it. We can certainly debate capitalism, communism, and socialism but I think we need to stop making that the most important debate. We need to see the strings they have draped around our proverbial arms and legs so that we stop being a marionet for them.
Think...
Pay attention...
Imagine new things...
Be brave...
Don't let fear be your driving motivator...
Dare to think big...
Dare to be different...
Dare to not fit in with the crowd...
Live up to your potential...
Don't blindly believe everything you are told...
Realize labels should not remove your right to think for yourself...
Health Ranger grows MONSTER lettuce using NO electricity, no soil, no pumps - see how
GROW FOOD without electricity or soil: Suspended net pot non-circulating hydroponic system
Ironically enough I was staring at the following post and hadn't even clicked on it when I had the thought that "Perhaps we should change the climate" and came to write this post.
The more you look into govern-cement, the more you see the nefariousness in their plans
...well, not their plans, those people pulling the strings' plans.
I dids't think of CO2 taxes as just a convenient way to tax more.
It is really hard to measure the actual pollutants, but CO2 can just be aproximated by BTUs or kWh or gallons of combustibles. So, it is really easy to figure out the tax amount.
BUT! What if these nefarious people haters actually did want to brown the planet?
A CO2 tax, and a propaganda campaign against CO2 (most of which does nothing to lower CO2) would be the way to do this.
Most professional greenhouses have bottles of CO2 to up the CO2 proportions in the greenhouse. Growing plants bigger, faster and healthier.
So, if that is better in a greenhouse, is it better around the world?
Lastly, we humans are a very small producer of CO2 on this planet.
A volcano eruption puts out more CO2 than all the cars in America.
Lastly, i want to remark that most CO2 lowering methods really hurt the environment.
And the rest of them are just moving CO2 manufacturing from the car to the power station...
Yep. That's pretty much the scenario.
I've known that and written of it before.
The change in thought today was the idea that maybe we should be changing the climate intentionally.
In reality that is exactly what we are doing if we keep attacking CO2. Perhaps we should be adding a bit more CO2 instead.
Perhaps we should consider the benefit of changing the climate in other ways.
Now this could of course be used as any tool, any technology can be used, that being benevolent or malevolent ways.
If governments really cared about pollution and waste, they would cut their own emissions from war and enforcement, and pare down the laws they impose on us. They don't.