This post was hidden due to low ratings.

Sort:  

Should vs can, right?

And far out - what we CAN do is amazing, yet we are just blips in a long history, our lives not amounting to much, in the scheme of things.

And I'm not even sure if I read a human test or an AI one, which makes me feel infinitely sad, because I want to engage with this text, but if I'm engaging with something not human generated, should I? Ah, the irony.

 9 months ago Reveal Comment

That's the problem with AI now - it's gotten so good that you find a good piece of writing suspiciously like AI. I wonder if we will edit our work to sound like a good AI piece reads like - and thus never sound like ourselves. I was reading about an author who was rejected from a magazine because they believed his article was so well written it must be AI, even though he hadn't ever used it. Such is the world we live in.

I love how you capitalise 'blips' - yes, we are often important in small ways. That's the 'scheme of things' - an expression to say how we fit in the larger pattern of life, I suppose.

A fantastic musing, and I really enjoyed it.

 9 months ago Reveal Comment

Yes, I've had conversations about that on Hive before - imperfection is actually more desirable because it's authentic. 'Standing our grouond and saying that clear thinking, care and good writing are still human things' - yes!!! I love this. Keep being smart mate, you have an avid follower here.