Another day, another dollar
I was chatting with some colleagues the other day and they were talking about the problems of multilevel marketing and how they offer "hope" to some while driving value to the very few at the top. I mentioned that this is exactly what platforms like Instagram do to their users who try to "monetize" their accounts as if they have a chance to do so. Essentially, the process is the same except for social media cites, the distribution spread is even lower.
In multilevel marketing, participants are encouraged to sell products (annoyingly) to their friends and family as well as recruit sellers who will sell products to their friends and family with each tier getting a referral fee from the one below in what would be considered a pyramid scheme process.
Instagram does much the same thing, except doesn't have to pay each layer, just the top ones. For example, you have a monetized large celebrity account with 100 million followers spruiking products and earning a massive amount, like Ronaldo who earned 3x more from Instagram posts than his highly paid club position as the top footballer in the world. This potential then inspires other users to try an become influencers, with a small number getting a million followers, more getting a hundred thousand and many getting ten thousand followers - with a lot of overlap of followers where most who follow the lowest tier group, also following the top tiers.
This creates a feedback matrix that is highly targetable, and because each is pushing products (even if they buy them themselves in a hope to get recognized) there is the potential for a lot of product spam that is able to be targeted to cross-referenced groups to offer the best potential for sales. A marketing company pays for access to the entire network, the platform only pays a percentage to the top tier accounts, those who inspire others.
When people hear "we are the product" we tend to think it is our data and content that has value, but this is not the case for most. What has value, is the network we possess and the potential to use it for targeted reach and dissemination of information. The network we have gives a platform granular insight into individuals through referencing all of the other connections from a single account and therefore, being able to build a highly accurate model of a user that can be sold for targeted marketing purposes.
The thing is that when it comes to marketing, social proof is a far better attractant and influencer than a billboard on the side of the road, and the social networks have built a system where they can create personalized billboards for every single user, all 4-odd billion of them. With every interaction, we are making their model of us more accurate and their targeting more precise, which means that they will be able to continually trim away the monetized accounts that are not performing as well, until there are only a handful of users who will ever see any return on their work at all - and it is work.
I know that a lot of people think that earning Hive is hard, but if you consider that the highest paid Instagram accounts have generally either been grinding for years or like Ronaldo, have been grinding for years in a career to build a massive following prior to joining, it isn't so hard to get a little Hive.
But as I was saying to my colleagues, the money flows to owners and on the centralized platform, users aren't owners, most don't have any rights to the content they post and if the platform chooses to demonetize, shadowban or delete an account, there is nothing they can do about it. Not only that, the "following" that they have built up over potentially years, doesn't follow them to a new platform.
Instead of empowernig users, the pyramid scheme they have designed allows for the platform to drive all value into their pockets, making them the masters of distribution, setting up for some very bad incentives. For example, if a monetized account is getting too expensive, they can demonetize and still retain the vast majority of the follower list as consumers of other content. This means they can attract, churn and then burn accounts on a continual cycle that maximizes their profits. They encourage users to build an account to monetize it, but have no loyalty whatsoever to that user and will instead use the mechanics to commandeer the followers and lead them to the next "latest and greatest" account, the one that they can pay less for.
This model doesn't work if all accounts are owners though, because owners will be looking for gains themselves - which means they will find ways to maximize, but will have a lot of competition to do so. This results in lower, but much wider spread of value across the network. However, it is also messier and far more organic in practice, as there are so many fingers in the pie and chefs in the kitchen.
And this gets to the crux use case of blockchain in my opinion. It is just a ledger - but what it does is tracks ownership at a scale and with precision and trust that was impossible to do earlier. This empowers us as users to become owners of our experience and rather than be subject to control from centralized platforms and authorities, be able to organize ourselves as a collective owners in a similar way that a small tribe once was, but at a global level with high participation. This means that the value of the network we generate is tied to us as users and has the benefits of the network effect paid back to us as owners. This redefines economies as we know them and with it, the distribution of wealth through the system, as value flows in ways that has never been possible before.
So few at this point recognize the pyramid scheme process of centralized social media because, the vast majority do not have any access to the value on the table, not even scraps. Most are not given the possibility of ownership and their only path is as a consumer that is bled dry, with the flow of value only ever going up, while they dish out valueless digital hearts, stars and thumbs.
If you don't own, you pay - one way, or another.
Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]
Your post reminds me of a great movie, Rounders.
At the movie intro, there's a saying which is exactly what centralized social media does to 99% of its users, only they never find they are the suckers after not half an hour, after years! 😂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=14&v=hZZwW10yTsc&feature=emb_logo
I have never seen the movie, but from that intro - for sure. I think most of us live a life of continual grind, because we work for a wage, rather than work to own.
!ENGAGE 20
ENGAGE
tokens.It's good and bad it depends on how you see it also lots of people's to scams on hive well social media made to make money
There are scammers everywhere - A society has to to learn how to deal with them - as there is always some percentage.
exactly some just post some images and 1 or 2 lines of text and its while some good post get ignored
People are funny about the "Follower" number. Like you mention if a Celeb in one social media leaves for another, does not mean that their followers will follow. They prefer the kool-aid of the platform they are on even though they know it is poison they continue to drink.
I am not sure, is Pewdie Pie still getting paid by Dlive to post there?
The problem with the celebrity leaving is that the platform generally chooses who that will be - and they tend to be the types of people who question the narrative.
I didn't know who Pewdie Pie was until the Dlive stuff, I still don't really know who he is, I had heard of the Heath Ranger before and of course Alex Jones, but I never really was a you tube user very much for anything other than listening to music.
I don't know Pewdie Pie either, just the name - never seen a video. Don't know Heath Ranger and Alex Jones is so loud and annoyingly self-centered and sensationalist, that I haven't ever watched more than a couple minutes in total of anything he is in.
I use YT for troubleshooting - If I need to learn how to do something like reset my wife's phone or build a wall, I will go to YT.
There is a lot of DIY help available on there, and yeah I agree about Alex Jones, he was part of the problem, seemed he just liked to stir the pot, and never really offer any solutions.
The Health Ranger was/is Mike Adams I believe, he was a doctor (regular MD type), that also spoke about alternative therapies.
Impressive analysis, it is important to remember the benefits not only monetary, but intellectual of Hive, the social network teaches the user to organize and produce quality material. Also as you mention the power of profit is decentralized, making profits easily accessible. It's not easy, but it's not as hard as getting 10,000 followers to monetize.
This extensive publication has many points to discuss, but you have explained them very well. I hope this quality material will multiply and the knowledge will reach many.
It also helps people understand and interact openly in a working economy. Part of the reason people think it is hard here, is a lack of transparency elsewhere. They see some nonsense here that isn't visible in other places, and therefore think it doesn't exist in other places - not that it is hidden from view.
Thanks for dropping by :)
I never find ways to maximise, much too lazy ;D
I've found that even if they do realise this and are aware that there are alternatives, they simply don't care at all because whatever megacorp social media is where "everyone else" is.
Me too.
People only care when it affects them directly. Won't be long.
Gold and Silver are and were and will be always the main resources on Earth, also the special jewels too.
More in this " strange times "
Good luck
Diamonds are a dime a dozen if De Beers released their holdings - not sure about other jewels.
Gold and silver however are decent stores for sure :)
You are right, if you can diamonds go for them, more smaller better.
What I mean is, diamonds are valueless as there are so many and the supply is dependent on one company. Because if this, diamonds are not considered a commodity.
Under an economic crisis, distribution is the key.
Ever been pulled into a Pyram.. er Mult-Level Marketing scheme? I have in 1990. I alienated a few people by 'selling the dream', bought some average products, and lastly got my car broken into losing all of them.
I ditched it at this point, and got a reprimand from the bloke above me for 'wasting his time'. If you haven't been involved in one, do it.. to get it out of your system.
I haven't. However, my mother got into Amway in the 80s and a couple others a bit later in the 90s. one of my brothers did for a bit too. They prey on desperate people in general who need some help.
I have enough experience young to never have got the urge at all. I understand it back in the 80s and 90s pre-internet though - now it just seems like a Nigerian email scam :) people still get hooked.
Mine was Amway, I went to a big conference in Birmingham.. it was packed with people. They were smashing alarm clocks stating, 'we don't need to get out of bed', we work for nobody but us.
Talk about cultish. My first SteemCamp was also in that city, I thought it was going to be the same!
There's a dude promoting a Crypto-Pyramid scheme on HIVE now, you will see it in Trending. It's proving unpopular.
I haven't seen it in Trending - but if it looks scammy - I generally don't even go in :)
They are very much like cults. The first set of people in to a country can make a massive amount. What I find interesting is that there are likely millions of people doing this daily still, yet most will likely earn more on Hive ;D
Amway was an incredibly successful MLM and as far as I know, is still running.
I was in ACN when I was 18 years old. What a waste of money xD
I haven't heard of them, but I err on the side that they are all a waste of time and money :D
!ENGAGE 20
ENGAGE
tokens.I have been in harder platforms, the hive is amazing compared to them. Everything in life takes time that's what i know
I have never tried to monetize my content before, so it is hard for me to judge. But, I do know people who have tried and most have got very little out of a lot of effort.
This multi level marketing scheme is the order of the day over here. Lol. I cannot count how many i have been coerced to join. Also now that social media has just turned into one big giant ad and no longer for the main social purpose. Patience and consistency is always the key.
Have any of them worked out well for you long-term?
Scams are generally opt-in ;)
Lol. Never even been involved in any. Call me lazy but always looking for people to join is not my thing at all
Great article. An example from my life. For 3 years I have been trying unsuccessfully to pass the level required to connect a YouTube channel. to monetization. On Hive, there is already an opportunity to monetize content from the first post.