After reading the CDC article about the PCR test being un authorized I realized the new test, is still the same RT-PCR test but they are adding a few more primers to test for flu and covid at the same time.
They worded it in a way that they would no longer use RT-PCR tests and that they made or discovered a brand "new" test which in reality, it is not new at all, it's just another deception tactic.
They will still be using the highly manipulative RT-PCR but with a new "multiplex assay" testing protocol. The RT-PCR will now be used to determine if someone has flu or covid or both at the same, or so it claims.
It can also be used to test and see if people are vaccinated or not. It can easily be primed to find the engineered genetic material from the vaccine injections.
They will be able to claim that a positive covid-19 result means the person is "vaccinated" so they will likely class the person with "flu".
If the test comes up negative for covid-19 then that result will mean the person is "non-vaccinated" and will claim the person has covid-19 infection. Basically the vaccinated people now be diagnosed with having cold or flu. If you are non vaccinated, you will be diagnosed having some make believe covid 19 variant.
The other/original covid-19 RT-PCR test protocol could only test for one genetic marker which was related to cold or flu detoxification. Instead of telling people they may or may not have flu, the decision was made to just call it covid-19.
If you remember flu cases went to 0 all around the world while "experts" claimed it was because people can't have two virus organism infections at the same time although now the CDC says you can.
Do you see the manipulation now?
They will keep saying they are testing for covid and flu but they can't actually test for something that is make believe like "covid-19" as no sars cov 2 virus organism has ever been isolated in whole form.
Another thing to note is that people can upload these genetic sequences and name them whatever they want. Just because you have tested positive for a genetic/viral protein sequence does not mean you now have a disease because that genetic isolate was found in you. This type of science is actually pseudo science aka "virology".
All this virus organism science is retarted and people need to stop believing in things that are not really there. It's getting ridiculous now as people are still sufficating themselves with masks and isolating from loved ones due to a mental construct of a deadly virus organism. We are all just dealing with our natural detoxification process inside our bodies by "reacting" to our environment.
Government, media and drug companies want you to live in fear of your own healthy natural body functions!
You react to your environment which can lead to a detoxification process starting up in your body, this can lead to you feeling unwell.
You have never caught a virus organism disease off someone.
You can get signals off people like when you see someone yawn, you might yawn if your brain decides to react to the oxygen levels inside you.
Same with coughing, you may cough when you hear or see someone cough but that's only if your body reacts to the signal.
We need to think more about messages and pathways not virus organisms chasing after us trying to kill us.
Anyone pushing these tests must be having a huge laugh!
Lets say these highly infectious, contagious and deadly virus invisable nano sized organisms were real.
If you got a negative test what's to stop you from getting infected from these virus organisms 5 seconds after you took your test?
You would need to test every second of your life until you test positive, this is a mental illness.
Lets say you test positive and you feel fine wouldn't this mean you are healthy with a working immune system protecting you?
When you think about all this testing you must see the total insanity behind it?
These sadistic restrictions that governments are putting on people, is clearly psychological abuse and needs to stop and all citizens deserve an apology for being terroized over a make believe virus organism.
Virologists also manipulated the whole virus isolation process.
There were no control experiments done during the sars cov 2 virus isolation process and all of virology seems to miss this step out when doing all virus isolation experiments.
If you can't compare and eliminate the isolated genetic material with proper control experiments properly then there is no way you can claim to have found a new virus organisms.
Especially when the method used to do this, requires a person or computer program to design and select a full virus genome by aligning random pieces of genetic material together into a recombinant agent from genetic material of animal and human cells with no control to compare it to!
Something else to think about.
"A chat with the CDC"
ME: CDC, should I get poke if I already had Covid?
CDC: “Yes, you should be poked regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19.”
ME: Oh, okay, we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts. Got it. So, how long does poke-induced immunity last?
CDC: “There is still a lot we are learning about COVID-19 pokes and
CDC is constantly reviewing evidence and updating guidance. We don’t know how long protection lasts for those who are poked.”
ME: Okay … but wait a second. I thought you said the reason I need the poke was because we don’t know how long my natural immunity lasts, but it seems like you’re saying we ALSO don’t know how long poke immunity lasts either. So, how exactly is the poke immunity better than my natural immunity?
ME: Uh … alright. But, haven’t there been a bunch of studies suggesting that natural immunity could last for years or decades?
NEWYORKTIMES: “Years, maybe even decades, according to a new study.”
ME: Ah. So natural immunity might last longer than poke immunity?
CDC: Possibly. You never know.
ME: Okay. If I get the poke, does that mean I won’t get sick?
BRITAIN: Nope. We are just now entering a seasonal spike and about half of our infections and hospital admissions are poked people.
ME: CDC, is this true? Are there a lot of people in the U.S. catching Covid after getting the poke?
CDC: We stopped tracking breakthrough cases. We accept voluntary reports of breakthroughs but aren’t out there looking for them.
ME: Does that mean that if someone comes in the hospital with Covid, you don’t track them because they’ve been poked? You only track the UN-poked Covid cases?
CDC: That’s right.
ME: Oh, okay. Hmm. Well, if I can still get sick after I get the poke, how is it helping me?
CDC: We never said you wouldn’t get sick. We said it would reduce your chances of serious illness or death.
ME: Oh, sorry. Alright, exactly how much does it reduce my chance of serious illness or death.
CDC: We don’t know “exactly.”
ME: Oh. Then what’s your best estimate for how much risk reduction there is?
CDC: We don’t know, okay? Next question.
ME: Um, if I’m healthy and don’t want the poke, is there any reason I should get it?
CDC: Yes, for the collective.
ME: How does the collective benefit from me getting poked?
CDC: Because you could spread the virus to someone else who might get sick and die.
ME: Can a poked person spread the virus to someone else?
ME: So if I get poked, I could still spread the virus to someone else?
ME: But I thought you just said, the REASON I should get poked was to prevent me spreading the virus? How does that make sense if I can still catch Covid and spread it after getting the poke?
CDC: Never mind that. The other thing is, if you stay unpoked, there’s a chance the virus could possibly mutate into a strain that escapes the pokes protection, putting all poked people at risk.
ME: So the poke stops the virus from mutating?
ME: So it can still mutate in poked people?
ME: This seems confusing. If the poke doesn’t stop mutations, and it doesn’t stop infections, then how does me getting poked help prevent a more deadly strain from evolving to escape the poke?
CDC: You aren’t listening, okay? The bottom line is: as long as you are unpoked, you pose a threat to poked people.
ME: But what KIND of threat??
CDC: The threat that they could get a serious case of Covid and possibly die.
ME: My brain hurts. Didn’t you JUST say that the poke doesn’t keep people from catching Covid, but prevents a serious case or dying? Now it seems like you’re saying poked people can still easily die from Covid even after they got the poke just by running into an unpoked person! Which is it??
CDC: That’s it, we’re hanging up now!
Source of "a chat with the cdc"