The Scientific Argument that Shows you There is Nothing Wonderful/Beautiful About the World

avatar

images - 2022-10-18T113856.520.jpeg
source

Everything is an Illusion

In the British Television series called "And Then There Were None", Miss Emily Brent (Played by Miranda Richardson) walks out of a mansion surrounded by a lot of nature, looked at how beautiful the scenery was and said, "Look at how beautiful nature is, it's shocking there are some who don't believe it has a creator" (paraphrased).

And this right here is the exact thought so many of us have. We think the world is so beautiful and wonderful so any argument against a creator is dead on arrival. The rest of us, though, who are probably atheists or have nothing against the arguments that the world probably doesn't have a creator still think and say that the world is beautiful and wonderful.

But the world is not beautiful or wonderful, because everything you see or perceive in any way is just an illusion. There is no beauty in the sky or trees or flowers or waterfalls, but rather it is something in you (your senses) that interprets these things as beautiful. If not for the things in you you wouldn't make anything out of anything.

For example, sugar is not sweet, it is the things inside you (sense of taste) that interprets sugar as sweet and pass it on to your brain. If I threw sugar on a rock the rock wouldn't perceive it as sweet, because it lacks what you have.

The skies and flowers are not beautiful, it is our senses (sight and aesthetic appreciation) that interpret them as beautiful, sands are rocks do not appreciate the beauty of these things because they lack the senses we have. And so on.

And these things in us that make us interpret and sense these things are things that can be removed. For example, if your eyes are removed you can no longer appreciate colours or beauty, those things you would have considered colours and beauty are still there but they're now nothing to you because you've lost something inside you.

If you lose your tongue, no more taste, etc. Also, your brain and all your organs and senses are what make you this being that you are capable of sensing or appreciating anything, if you were to lose them all nothing means anything anymore. So since everything is dependent on certain senses to interpret them as meaningful then they're meaningless. Because on their own they are nothing.

Everything is Blank

Hence nothing is beautiful or wonderful or anything. Everything is just nothing.

Further, what if your senses interpreted things in a different way? What if your senses evolved in a different way and interpreted what we now considered beautiful as ugly? Interpreted red as white? Or black as yellow? We can already see in our world today how people and different creatures view the same thing as different things.

(1) Cats, wolves, foxes, mice, bats and owls all see better at night than during the day. So what is darkness? Is darkness something that impairs vision? No, it's simply our senses that interpret it like that, the above animals interpret it differently.

(2) This is the way a dog sees this image vs how a human sees it:

article_color_simulation_02.jpg
source

Now, what is the true look of this image? The answer is that there is no true look, it's all dependent on the senses, the image itself is absolutely nothing besides what the senses make of it.

(3) On autistic people, here is an excerpt from Malcolm Gladwell's 2005 book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking:

On page 289, Gladwell reports:

Robert T. Schultz, once did an experiment with what is called an FMRI (functional magnetic resonance imagery), a highly sophisticated brain scanner that shows where the blood is flowing in the brain at any given time — and hence, which part of the brain is in use. Schultz put people in the FMRI machine and had them perform a very simple task in which they were given either pairs of faces or pairs of objects (such as chairs or hammers) and they had to press a button indicating whether the pairs were the same or different.

Normal people, when they were looking at the faces, used a part of their brain called the fusiform gyrus, which is an incredibly sophisticated piece of brain software that allows us to distinguish among the literally thousands of faces that we know. (Picture in your mind the face of Marilyn Monroe. Ready? You just used your fusiform gyrus.) When the normal participants looked at the chair, however, they used a completely different and less powerful part of the brain — the inferior temporal gyrus — which is normally reserved for objects. (The difference in the sophistication of those two regions explains why you can recognize Sally from the eighth grade forty years later but have trouble picking out your bag on the airport luggage carousel.)

When Schultz repeated the experiment with autistic people, however, he found that they used their object-recognition area for both the chairs and the faces. In other words, on the most basic neurological level, for someone with autism, a face is just another object.

Here is one of the earliest descriptions of an autistic patient in the medical literature: “He never looked up at people’s faces. When he had any dealings with persons at all, he treated them, or rather parts of them, as if they were objects. He would use a hand to lead him. He would, in playing, butt his head against his mother as at other times he did against a pillow. He allowed his boarding mother’s hand to dress him, paying not the slightest attention to her.”

Crazy isn't it? The world is nothing but just something your senses make of it.

The Passage of Time Gives a Lot of Perspective on This

Here is what humans looked like a very long time ago:

photostudio_1671571262806.png
source

Can you imagine living with these people, marrying them, falling in love with them, hugging and kissing them? Of course not because your mind/senses make them out to be hideous. But do you know that if you were born in their time you would have made, loved and had kids with them? 🤣🤣 it would have been normal to you.

Now, after millions of more years, humans would look different from what we look like now and the humans of the future would probably look at us now and be disgusted by us 🤣🤣. They'll say "I can't believe Kim Kardashian was considered beautiful and everyone wanted her! Even Beyonce or Rihanna, you mean these hideous beasts were once the desire of many? I can't stand being in the same room with them 🤣🤣". Just the same way you had looked at those pictures of the old humans.


The End


Hi there, my novella Professor Otagburuagu just got published. It promises to be thoroughly entertaining and intellectually stimulating. Written by myself and illustrated by Scandinavian artist @katharsisdrill. You can get it from me for just 4 HBD.

You can also order the hard copy from anywhere in the world via this link: https://katharsisdrill.art/the-katharsisdrill-shop/professor-otagburuagu/

I'm counting on your patronage, thank you!



Roll with @nevies, I run a Humor, deeper thoughts, and sex talk blog here on Hive🌚



0
0
0.000
18 comments
avatar

Can you imagine living with these people, marrying them, falling in love with them, hugging and kissing them? Of course not because your mind/senses make them out to be hideous. But do you know that if you were born in their time you would have made, loved and had kids with them? 🤣🤣 it would have been normal to you.

Can't answer the question before you show me the female versions first ;<)

This and the next paragraph made me laugh!

P.S. Do you think these 'hideous' beasts from the past aka our forefathers and -mothers ( if you believe in the evolution theory ) would have liked !PIZZA ?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ah, and I saw the female versions, I should have posted them too. Anyways, here is one from a museum in your country:

I think they would have loved pizza. LOL. Thanks a lot.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Sexy! ;^)

My country? you mean, the Netherlands

or here, in Portugal?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah, I meant Netherlands.

Hahaha. You consider that sexy? 🤣🤣🤣

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great argument and one I agree with entirely. Playing devil's advocate, could it be God designed us to see beauty, so that we would treasure the wonders of His creation? I don't believe in God so don't be thinking I say as such. But it's a point.

Another is that we recognize ourselves in the beauty of the world, and thus are inclined to protect beauty, as it is an element of us, and we are part of all things.

Who knows, but it would be a sad world WITHOUT beauty.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Another is that we recognize ourselves in the beauty of the world, and thus are inclined to protect beauty, as it is an element of us, and we are part of all things.

I completely agree with you.

Your point about God probably making us to derive beauty from the world is a good one too 😃✌.

I think it would be a sad world too without beauty and an ability to enjoy the experience

0
0
0.000
avatar

hi @nevies I am off to bed shortly but just saw this in the comments to the contest post. But you forgot to drop it into Dreemport :-( And this is necessary to be graded for the contest... boo hoo... You would need to do one other thing too... and that is to change the images used in your post to royalty-free images as we don't accept those that are subject to copyright. I will come back and read this post tomorrow when I am awake... it is almost 4 am here. If you can get the images changed, I will see if there is anything I can do. Drop me a DM in discord if you manage to resolve the image issues early enough tomorrow. Can't promise anything though...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hehe he. Damn, so many rules. Before making the post I registered on dreemport. I thought that might make my post available on dreemport. How do I put my post on dreemport after registering, pls?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

hey, my friend 🤗 ok... so you go to dreemport.com, log in, and select daily task and curate. Then you get allocated 5 random posts to read and rank. You are welcome to engage and upvote them if you wish. Once you have curated, then the option to submit a post opens up under daily task and you can share your own post there. each set of curation allows you to submit one post (max 1 post per day). You cannot bank a curation ie: you can't curate one day and submit the next. You need to curate the day you submit.... both events need to happen between 4 am UTC and midnight UTC on the same day (Mon-Friday only)

If you have the time... these videos by @dreemsteem are very helpful

!PIZZA !ALIVE

0
0
0.000
avatar

In the end, it all boils down to perspective, right? Whether we individually perceive beauty in the world or not may depend on our personal ability to do so, but in general, humankind has a similar sense of what is beautiful in nature albeit that social conditioning and other abstracts may tarnish certain views and experiences of life. But the fact that an inanimate object is unable to respond adequately to beauty, to my mind, does not satisfy the argument that a thing is therefore not beautiful !LOLZ This was an interesting and intriguing response to dreem-wotw. Please make sure you enter your post via Dreemport next time hehe. I'd love for it to be in contention for the prizes. !LUV !PIZZA

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's too late to get it in dreemport, isn't it? Plus I don't think I can get any other type of photos for this. For next time, you mean sourcing the images is not enough?

0
0
0.000
avatar

No, it's not too late for you to share it in Dreemport at all. It is too late for the contest but you can share any age of post in Dreemport. You will need to remove the copyrighted photos first though and replace them with royalty-free images which show their source 😉!PIZZA

0
0
0.000