You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: ...

in Deep Diveslast year

Probably it's blasphemy to say that my decision to not believe in the epidemic and to not let me test nor being injected does not include data, but my own voice which said "no" to all of this ... early on. I don't want anybody to take hold of my body or mind. I refuse to believe in things, many other people believe in. I trust my inner statistician which may sound ridiculous, for one seems obsessed with source naming and the single human is not taking seriously any more, saying that observation of single humans cannot count. One may be wrong in terms for "the whole world" but then the whole world is not of my concern.

People demand reasons, sources, citations, but I am already sick of it. The individuals stand point is being reduced by all this, the individual counts nothing, the collective everything. It's odd and I find it worrying.

I often cannot name exactly or even nearly where my reasonings come from, it's the sum of a lifetimes journey where what I read, experienced and lived through formed my beliefs and un-beliefs. How could I possibly name all the influences and sources by dates and names?

Nevertheless I welcome your text and reblog it. People seem to need it and I don't totally resist that. But for myself, I made up my mind since this whole thing began.

Sort:  

🙌💖🙏

And in exemplifying such innate intelligence, you win more of my respect than the billions who blindly march off the cliff trusting a dying establishment based in lies, distortions, and fear combined.

(I know that may seem/sound harsh to some - especially those in the latter group - but it’s the truth of how I feel on the matter.)

Thanks :)

How can we overcome the enmity between the camps and still maintain dignity? It's like living in parallel worlds where there seems no access to each other. I try to find a middle way but that's not easy. Trying to ask direct questions or avoid the topic all over when I sense that otherwise another bridge would be closed.

Have a good day and thank you again for the research.
Sincere greetings!

Good question.

From one angle, I could see that as an unrealistic aim. (At least in regards to bringing all people in alignment.) That there are some people who’ve went so far into one extreme or another and may not be willing to seek the middle ground of peace between camps.

From another... perhaps it’s simply a matter of doing so individually - knowing that it’d be impossible to get everyone on the same page, but walking in our personal truth regardless as an example of that higher degree of character we’d like to see more of in the world.

My favourite astrologer, The Leo King, was just saying last night how he foresees the V not getting approved - and how that actually might be a catalyst to healing the divide. I’d personally like to see that unfold, as then it’d be pretty hard for people to keep denying.

Either way, perhaps just a matter of “staying in our own lanes” while honouring that’s others are in theirs, taking their own journeys to different destinations, and emanating compassion irregardless of what others choosing to aggressively reinforce the division are doing. Perhaps each shall come to see different levels of Truth in their own timing - or not - and best just surround ourselves with those whose embodiment supports what we need for our own highest/best growth. Blah Blah Blah. 🤷‍♂️

🥂

:) HaHa, I like it when you put a Blah Blah Blah behind your sentences. Shows your humor.

From one angle, I could see that as an unrealistic aim.

And it probably is. So it's always a pick and see, no? I try to go by the way you mentioned here. Oftentimes I am able to do that, more than the other way around. The thing is, I feel, that I am holding myself back when I question another person and assume, he or she might not do me the same favor. That's the aggravating component in social contact. Trying to still learn to stay true.

Blessings!