Explained: Why do Russian generals make stupid mistakes since the beginning of the war?

avatar

why_do_russian_generals_make_stupid_mistakes_since_the_beginning_of_the_war.png

Since the beginning of the war, you have probably heard about the slow progress made by the Russian troops in Ukraine because of the strong civilian and military resistance of the Ukrainian people. However, the Russians are almost helping them, by making the most amateur and idiotic mistakes imaginable, since this whole campaign, has been a complete mess from the start.

It all started with the Russians, going to war, with equipment, that was hardly maintained and the tanks and trucks were losing tires, as soon as they crossed the border and when they were not losing tires, they were simply breaking down every few minutes, bringing a 40 mile long convoy, to a complete stand still.****This giant target, was constantly under fire from Ukrainian Jets and Drones, picking off specific high level targets in the convoy, however this wasn’t even the Russian’s biggest problem.

image.png
40mile russian convoy

You see the Russians, had terrible supply lines, running to the battle field and were unable to provide their soldiers with enough ammunition, fuel and food to continue fighting, which led to them constantly having to pause the battle and also resulted in mass desertion.Now remember, this all happened in just 2 weeks of fighting, so moral must have been at an absolute low from the start. So in order to fix this disaster, the giant convoy was assembled to penetrate deep into Ukraine and provide fresh supplies to the battlefield, but since the convoy got stuck every couple of miles and eventually was even stranded for several days, they were using up the very same supplies they were supposed to deliver to Kyiv.

The soldiers across various battlefields, were running out of food and thus started to plunder local supermarkets. So this all shows, what a complete mess the planning and executing of this campaign into Ukraine was, however the most spectacular failure came, when the Russian generals, decided to bomb, the Ukrainian telecommunications. Now normally this would be a smart thing to do, since you prevent your opponent, from being able to communicate, not just on a military level, but also the civilians, that want to stay and fight or fulfil a support role. However in this case, it was pretty much the dumbest thing, that you could do, since the Russians were very limited in their ability to communicate.

image.png
Russian soldiers collect supplies from a market in Ukraine

They relied heavily on the Ukrainian 3G and 4G network, which they used for their own encrypted communication services. So when they bombed these cell towers and power stations, they effectively destroyed their own means of secure communications.This error turned out to be a grave one, since now, the Russian had to use the old public network, in large part of Ukraine and you won’t believe this, but this meant using Ukrainian sim cards. This is such an amateur, since obviously, Ukrainian intelligence has complete control over this network and they were able to listen to every single call, the Russians were making, which allowed them to prepare a perfect ambush.

Here is the audio recording of a conversation between two Russian soldiers on a Ukrainian telecom network:

During the ambush dozens of Russian soldiers were killed and several vehicles destroyed. On top of that, one of several generals was also taken out, something that seems to be happening a lot. Many military experts are stunned, by how many Russian generals, are being killed by the Ukrainian soldiers and the reason for this, lies, yet again, in the Russian communications skills.

image.png
3 russian generals died in battlefield

Somehow, after all these years of investing and showing off their military might, during parades, Russians have not invested in adequate communications technology, for use on the battlefield, which means, that in order to effectively manage troop movements, the generals and other high ranking officers, are forced to enter the battlefield themselves and are constantly being put, in a dangerous position. This concept of having clear lines of communication, protecting the leadership, and keeping a good overview of the battlefield, is something even the ancient Romans understood and they executed this perfectly, without them having access to satellites. This was, “Why do Russian generals make stupid mistakes since the beginning of the war?”,



0
0
0.000
22 comments
avatar

Hi guys, for some reason the audio recording video I uploaded cannot be viewed. I uploaded the video to 3speak but there seems to be some access issues. If you want to listen to the audio recording, it may be better to check my article again after a few hours.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm no expert on Russian history (by far), but aren't these sorts of mistakes often par for the course? Peter the Great saw defeat after defeat during the beginning years of the Great Northern War with Charles XII (and later on against the Turks), Nicholas II bungled his military expeditions... much of the time, to my observation, Russia has stood simply because its geography and harsh winters have killed opposing armies better than its military planning could.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Russian general war strategy doesn't care much about soldier mortality. We already learned this when he sent millions of his people to the front in the first and second world wars without semi-munitions. Russia will probably win this war, but after heavy losses, it is necessary to discuss how much has been won in a war that was won.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That's so true... and what will winning even look like for the Russians? Or maybe the better question is how could it be defined as winning? Holding territory where the population constantly resists you? What a hollow victory at such high costs for both sides.

0
0
0.000
avatar

When we look at the history books, it is written that the Russians brought the end of Napoleon, but this is not true. The end of Napoleon was brought by Spain, which he occupied, and the people who resisted him. Because holding Spanish lands was very costly for Napoleonic France. Guerrilla warfare cost Napoleon an empire. Similar things happened to almost all major imperialist countries. It is not possible for Russia with a population of 150 million to retain Ukraine with a population of 50 million for a long time. Putin is preparing his own end.. Hope this war thing will be over soon cuz these people are dying. This killed ppl pictures don't suit for 21th century.

0
0
0.000
avatar

100%. I hope it will be over soon too. It's heartbreaking.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Except for Syria.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Except for Iraq.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Libya is enjoying its Liberation.

0
0
0.000
avatar

All hail the liberation of Afghanistan.

0
0
0.000
avatar

The French invasion of Russia, also known as the Russian Campaign, the Second Polish War, the Second Polish Campaign, the Patriotic War of 1812 , and the War of 1812, was begun by Napoleon to force Russia back into the Continental blockade of the United Kingdom. Napoleon's invasion of Russia is one of the best studied military campaigns in history and is listed among the most lethal military operations in world history.[3] It is characterized by the massive toll on human life.[4]

On 24 June 1812 and the following days, the first wave of the multinational Grande Armée crossed the Niemen into Russia. Through a series of long forced marches, Napoleon pushed his army of almost half a million people rapidly through Western Russia, now Belarus, in an attempt to destroy the separated Russian armies of Barclay de Tolly and Pyotr Bagration who amounted to around 180,000–220,000 at this time.[5][6] Within six weeks, Napoleon lost half of the men because of the extreme weather conditions, disease and hunger, winning just the Battle of Smolensk. The Russian Army continued to retreat, under its new Commander in Chief Mikhail Kutuzov, employing attrition warfare against Napoleon forcing the invaders to rely on a supply system that was incapable of feeding their large army in the field.

The fierce Battle of Borodino, seventy miles (110 km) west of Moscow, was a narrow French victory that resulted in a Russian general withdrawal to the south-east of Moscow.[7] On 14 September, Napoleon and his army of about 100,000 men occupied Moscow, only to find it abandoned, and the city was soon ablaze, instigated by its military governor. Napoleon stayed in Moscow for five weeks, waiting for a peace offer that never came.[8] Because of the nice weather he left late and hoped to reach Smolensk by a detour. Losing the Battle of Maloyaroslavets he was forced to take the same route as he came. Lack of food and winter clothes for the men, fodder for the horses, and guerilla warfare from Russian peasants and Cossacks led to greater losses. Again more than half of the men died on the roadside of exhaustion, typhus and the harsh continental climate. Heavy loot was thrown away; artillery was left behind.

In early November it began to snow, which complicated the retreat. In the Battle of Krasnoi Napoleon was able to avoid a complete defeat. Meanwhile, he was almost without cavalry and artillery, and deployed the Old Guard for the first time.[9] When the Berezina was reached, Napoleon only had about 49,000 troops and 40,000 stragglers of little military value. The Grande Armée had deteriorated into a disorganized mob, and the Russians could not conclude otherwise. On 5 December, Napoleon left the army in a sledge and returned to Paris. Within a few days, 20,000 more perished from the bitter cold and lice.[10] Murat and Ney, the new commanders continued, leaving more than 20,000 men behind in the hospitals of Vilnius. What was left of the main armies crossed the frozen Niemen and the Bug disillusioned.

Although estimates vary because precise records were not kept,[11] numbers exaggerated and auxiliary troops not always counted, Napoleon's army entered Russia with more than 450,000 men,[12] more than 150,000 horses,[13] around 25,000 wagons and more than 1,250 pieces of artillery. Only 120,000 men survived (excluding early deserters);[a] as many as 380,000 died in the campaign.[15] Perhaps most importantly, Napoleon's reputation of invincibility was shattered.[16]

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hoping to extend the Continental System, his embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and declared his brother Joseph King of Spain in 1808. The Spanish and the Portuguese revolted in the Peninsular War, culminating in defeat for Napoleon's marshals. Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia in the summer of 1812. The resulting campaign witnessed the catastrophic retreat of Napoleon's Grande Armée. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russian forces in a Sixth Coalition against France. A chaotic military campaign resulted in a large coalition army defeating Napoleon at the Battle of Leipzig in October 1813. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. He was exiled to the island of Elba, between Corsica and Italy. In France, the Bourbons were restored to power. However, Napoleon escaped Elba in February 1815 and took control of France.[6][7] The Allies responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Except for Yemen.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Iraq invasion, 20 years soon.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Based on CNN and MSNBC lol.

0
0
0.000
avatar

ok commie, if truths re hurt you keep watching your independent media that completely controlled by the putin
image.png

0
0
0.000
avatar

Are you ridiculing me for independent media, claiming that's its "completely controlled by Putin"?

Seems legit, NBC, correct?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Which truths would that be? Lolol

0
0
0.000
avatar

In other news, Western NPC is infuriated into posting memes as they are mocked as parroting the Friend of the People, CNN et all.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Why you mad, I'm not sure you deserve the attention, but do you really expect that propaganda, to not be ridiculed? Or do you think mocking me, for questioning your interpretation of the events, which are no different than the captives in Plato's cave allegory, would strengthen your credibility?

0
0
0.000