RE: Do you sometimes toss your best thoughts into the void of some obscure comment section? I know I do.
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
If u observed and used reason it would logically lead u to the conclusion that there is zero evidence for a deity or god. Bc there isn’t.
A truly brilliant and dizzying intellect.... not
There is zero evidence of God, because we (humanity) were given free will.
Free will in the sense that we could choose if we wanted to search for God.
Thus, there is zero direct evidence of God.
(One of the things we will find when we start communicating with alien races is "What? You do not know God exists?")
However, you can search for God, and when you do there is evidence everywhere.
A delve into real science shows "the fingerprints of God everywhere".
A delve into real spirituality and meditation and you start to feel a presence that you can get to know.
That said, Christianity is really shtupid in their own text!
Like, they just change all the words into "god". Elohim... just another word for "god".
When, we will probably find out that the Elo (an alien race) came and fucked with us and our DNA.
Then the Bible makes a lot more sense, but a lot less sense that we would call it a holy book.
I prefer Buddhism. As it is a collection of pathways to god(hood), or Yogas.
Buddhism has its denominations as well. They are not always as benevolent.
I myself am not a fan of organized religion.
I do not have a problem with the moral teachings in "The Bible" in particular the New Testament, yet there is a lot of baggage that goes along with it that I have problems with.
Yes, there are a dizzying amount of contradictions in the bible. Some of them have been edited in newer texts to make it NOT as obvious.
Yet that doesn't mean I do not see value there.
I simply do not view it as the word of God. I view it as the word of Man.
As such I do not think I must believe every single thing that is in the text. This is especially true because I own so many different bibles and firsthand know they are often quite different from each other.
I prefer a Bible thumper over an Atheism thumper.
I'd prefer to not have people forcefully trying to say "I am right, and you are wrong" regardless of their ideology...
Yet if I had to choose I'd take the Bible thumper.
Yes.
Most atheist i encounter are actually anti-Christian, and not really atheists.
In so doing, they throw out all the moral stories (and thus morals)
Maybe they should just be called Hedonists
Then they start things like atheism plus... which is supposed to be about following science, but they lack the key ingredient of science, which is truth. Being truthful in all things.
So, as you, i prefer a Bible thumper over an Atheism thumper.
It also doesn't hurt that I've never met a Bible Thumper that actually knew as much about their religion and the Bible as I do. LOL.
I feel I should clarify. I have met Christians that know as much as I do and MORE about their religion. Yet none of them have been Bible Thumpers. They had to think and research a lot to get where they are. Most Bible Thumpers don't put forth that much effort. They just repeat what they have been conditioned to repeat.
I agree 100%.
Most Bible Thumpers don't even know that the Bible is edited and abridged, then translated and edited again.