(Math - Calculus): "DERIVATIVES OF TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS (WITH PROOF)"

avatar

20210616_121052_0000.png

πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“–

Hello everyone. My name is Faisal Hanafi Harahap. I live in Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia. I am a Math student in North Sumatera University (Universitas Sumatera Utara(USU)).

πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™

This is my second post in this community. I want to share about the "Derivatives of Trigonometric Functions (With Proof)".

πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š

To prove the derivatives of the sine and cosine functions, it is necessary to first know about the Special Trigonometric Limits, they are:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_1.jpg

πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“–

[1] d(sin x)/dx = cos x

Proof:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_3.jpg

πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™

[2] d(cos x)/dx = -sin x

Proof:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_4.jpg

πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š

[3] d(tan x)/dx = secΒ² x

Proof:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_2.jpg

πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“–

[4] d(cot x)/dx = -cscΒ² x

Proof:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_6.jpg

πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™

[5] d(sec x)/dx = tan x β€’ sec x

Proof:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_7.jpg

πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š πŸ“š

[6] d(csc x)/dx = -cot x β€’ csc x

Proof:

Adobe Scan 17 Jun 2021_5.jpg

πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“– πŸ“–

Reference/Source: Calculus Ninth Edition by Varberg, Purcell, and Rigdon.

.

Okay guys, that's all I want to share with all of you at this time. What do you think? Correct me if I'm wrong. Please give your feedback in the comments column. Thank you for seeing this post, see my other posts tooπŸ˜‰πŸ˜‰...

πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™ πŸ“™



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

I found the proofs fairly easy and clear to follow.

It may be worth adding that you used the sum of angles formula in the first two proofs.

0
0
0.000