Will You Support Polycub Improvement Proposal To Make Emission Halving Time Longer?

avatar

Will You Support Polycub Improvement Proposal To Make Emission Halving Time Longer?

1st read this. It'll explain why I think we're too early to fix emissions at 0.0625 pCUB/Block. Docs make a very good argument in support of fixing emissions. But that's only 1 side of story.

@onealfa.leo got me into thinking of a way better alternative than fixing emissions to 985.5K pCUB/Year.

Both Sides Get What They Like

Current problem is getting enough TVL. CUB is doing better at this. Idea is to not cut down emissions that will reduce APR. We can still have the cake and eat it too. When mission is fixed to 985.5K pCUB/Year. Inflation stats at 13.73% and go down slowly over years. After 1 year inflation will be 12%

What About This Promise?

  • If we slow halving schedule we stick with this promise
  • There will be enough APR till next bull market
  • Max supply won't become 361% of current maximum

Yeah... 3.6X bigger supply of tokens don't mean the best news for long term. If we don't have enough TVL - we might not have much of a long term. PIP 4 can be

  • 90 Day
  • 180 Day
  • 365 Day
  • No Change

This won't change tokenomics much. Old promises stay mostly intact. I'm just building on top of @onealfa.leo I should have thought of this before. We all should have thought of this before!

It's really the best options we have. 7.2M supply instead of 26M. APR gets to be OK till next bull run. What do you think?

  • Slow down halving schedule
  • Fix emission at 0.0625 pCUB/Block
  • Don't make changes

Answer the question at dpoll.io.

hive-120019 dpoll leofinance polycub defi tokenomics technology waivio ocd archon gems neoxian palnet bilpcoin
0
0
0.000
17 comments
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I’m afraid APR will be non existent until next bull run. We’ve already seen MTB capital decline by 90% on Polycub while exponential growth is occurring on CUB.

Allowing incumbents to just sit on a large stack of POLYCUB with no inflation turns out to be a bad idea. We must learn to adapt and question assumptions.

Our team was wrong with the inflation halvening scheduled. Simply. Wrong.

No other way to put it. A bullish argument exists to prolong halvenings - say, to a yearly basis.

That is something that can continually be evaluated by polycub DAO.

When MTB was at its prime on Polycub, we earned over $13k in monthly revenue from MTB alone… last month we made $400.

Do we want polycub to grow or do we want to see it maintain a low market cap for the next 20 years?

I’d rather see growth and a true business model emerge, not just using PoL to pay 20% APR to vex holders with no LP growth

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

I get your reasoning better now. DAO has already made the vote. These voters have skin in the game. Because we are still in tough markets promoting stablecoin yield is probably best. Anchor managed to get billions in with 20% APR. If pCUB price climb back up - we can top that APR. What if https://polycub.com had IDO like CUB? I'm just leaving this as an idea.

Another 1 is lottery/dice game like https://epicdice.io played with pCUB. DAO can make few extra bucks. More importantly it's an extra use for pCUB! Not sure if it'll be worth the development resources. Best to gauge community interest 1st. @epicdice is a nice case study to look around. !LUV !PIZZA

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Fix emission at 0.0625 pCUB/Block
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Voted for

  • Slow down halving schedule
0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Good questions.

In the Continuous Quality Improvement world we have an acronym P.D.A. which stands for Plan Do Assess, and change if needed.

Plans can be good at the beginning, and still need to be adjusted in the future based on outcomes.

Everything must be willing to adapt to changing circumstances or perish in the changing landscape.

This article is a good example of the need to consider adaptation on PolyCub.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Thank you for feedback! Have a !PIZZA 😆

0
0
0.000
Reply