RE: A little more robotic

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

That is a great essay. How much, exactly, is lost if we remove the learning curve?
A question for philosophers, gets down to definitions of good and bad.

I've never been "good" at photography. But I can now take the many many shots I need to get the right angle, the right distance, the right light, then crop it just so, jimmy the color level just a tad, and end up with a photo that is pretty darn good! I feel like a pro! But the best photographers SEE differently. There is not yet a device that can do that.



0
0
0.000
6 comments
avatar

did you see this @tarazkp? no amateur can do this, or even imagine trying to do it, we can not imagine the photo to go for it in the first place.
https://peakd.com/hive-114105/@manoldonchev/a-horse-in-a-pan

0
0
0.000
avatar

I did see it ... but with enough shots... ;D

Manold is great.

0
0
0.000
avatar

But I could not even imagine trying for that shot. Manold knew it was there, somewhere, somehow. Thank goodness.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thank you for your engagement on this post, you have recieved ENGAGE tokens.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is the "seeing" that many miss and the positioning oneself before the shot, in anticipation, settings at the ready or, ready to be adjusted on the fly. Pros have the experience to predict. We can all have some fun though :)

0
0
0.000