✈️#911Truth Part 14: Building 7 Turning to Dust for Over 7 Hours (Fast Forward 45X Speed)
In #911Truth Part 14 I have compiled together in chronological order what may very well be the most complete picture of what actually happened to Building 7: which is it got turned to dust gradually from inside out for 7 hours before falling like a hollowed out shell. World Trade Center 7 (also referred to as WTC 7, Salomon Brothers building, or “Building 7”) has been far too often used erroneously (intentionally and unintentionally) as “proof” of conventional controlled demolition; and often by only showing the few seconds where it falls down (albeit extremely quietly leaving very little rubble or seismic impact or projectiles as would be expected from anything conventional). But removing all mainstream and “mainstream alternative” narratives aside, our eyes show us exactly what happened…
I have stitched together 8 videos and sped up the majority at 45X speed to give a complete and concise view of Building 7 turning into dust, much like the rest of World Trade Center complex (which consisted of 7 buildings in total including the Twin Towers WTC 1 and 2). A full description and screenshots of the main events in each video is shown in the accompanying Hive post: https://peakd.com/history/@mes/911truth-part-14-building-7-turning-to-dust-for-over-7-hours-fast-forward-45x-speed
The original videos with sound are shown in the following “EnhancedWTCVideos” YouTube channel, and which obtains the videos from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from the National Institute of (coverup) Science and (coverup) Technology (NIST). They are listed below along with the timestamps.
- @ 0:00 –
- WTC 7 not dustifying until WTC 1 falls at 10:28:22 AM.
- Better angle of WTC 7 beginning to dustify after WTC 1 falls.
- Dustification of WTC 7 at unconfirmed time: Likely 1 PM to 2 PM.
- Dustification of WTC 7 from: 1:59:53 PM to 2:50:09 PM.
- Dustification of WTC 7 from one side at unconfirmed time: between 3 PM and 4 PM?
- Dustification and fall of WTC 7 from 5:05:45 PM to 6:00:05 PM.
- WTC 7 falls at about 5:20:52 PM (dustification of about 7 hours).
- WTC 7 rubble still fuming/dustifying at unconfirmed time: September 12th or 13th?
- WTC 7 rubble still fuming/dustifying at unconfirmed time: September 18th or 19th?
At the end of the 8th video and overall video in general, I have included what appears to be a memorial to the firefighters that lost their lives during 9/11… #NeverForget
Stay tuned for #911Truth Part 15...
Related Videos:
✈️#911Truth Part 8: North Tower Literally Turning to Dust (Fast Forward 45X Speed): https://peakd.com/terrorism/@mes/911truth-part-8-north-tower-literally-turning-to-dust-fast-forward-45x-speed
✈️#911Truth Part 9: North & South Towers Literally Turning to Dust (Fast Forward 45X Speed): https://peakd.com/terrorism/@mes/911truth-part-9-north-and-south-towers-literally-turning-to-dust-fast-forward-45x-speed
✈️#911Truth Part 13: Helicopter Footage of the Twin Towers Turning to Dust (Fast Forward 45X Speed): https://peakd.com/history/@mes/911truth-part-13-helicopter-footage-of-the-twin-towers-turning-to-dust-fast-forward-45x-speed
#911Truth video series: https://peakd.com/truth/@mes/911
#MESScience video series: https://mes.fm/science-playlist
#MESExperiments video series: https://peakd.com/mesexperiments/@mes/list
#AntiGravity video series: https://peakd.com/antigravity/@mes/series
#FreeEnergy video series: https://mes.fm/freeenergy-playlist .
SUBSCRIBE via EMAIL: https://mes.fm/subscribe
DONATE! ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ https://mes.fm/donate
Like, Subscribe, Favorite, and Comment Below!
Follow us on:
Official Website: https://MES.fm
Hive: https://peakd.com/@mes
Gab: https://gab.ai/matheasysolutions
Minds: https://minds.com/matheasysolutions
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MathEasySolns
Facebook: https://fb.com/MathEasySolutions
LinkedIn: https://mes.fm/linkedin
Pinterest: https://pinterest.com/MathEasySolns
Instagram: https://instagram.com/MathEasySolutions
Email me: [email protected]
Try our Free Calculators: https://mes.fm/calculators
BMI Calculator: https://bmicalculator.mes.fm
Grade Calculator: https://gradecalculator.mes.fm
Mortgage Calculator: https://mortgagecalculator.mes.fm
Percentage Calculator: https://percentagecalculator.mes.fm
Try our Free Online Tools: https://mes.fm/tools
iPhone and Android Apps: https://mes.fm/mobile-apps
▶️ 3Speak
Never heard of dustification.
Is this an argument that the building is not suffering from a normal type of fire? What about the metal framework? Do building fires normally dustify the metal parts of office buildings?
There were no normal fires present and very little evidence of conventional heat; note the millions of unburnt paper. Most of the buildings, including the steel and the most of the people inside, turned to dust leaving very little rubble or seismic impact. Dustification is a term first coined by Dr. Judy Wood to describe this new phenomenon. In fact, the rubble were still dustifying for months and even years afterwards, which is indicative of continually molecular breakdown.
NIST even had conducted fire experiments and which as expected hardly any damage was done to the building structure:
It is the concrete that turned to dust. The steel turned molten, and created an underground pool of molten metal that delayed the destruction of the crime scene by weeks because it remained too hot to approach.
Building fires have never before or since caused a steel framed skyscraper to collapse, so fires do not 'dustify' office buildings normally. Neither do they turn the steel frame into pools of liquid iron so hot it remains molten for weeks. Burning carpet and office chairs don't create the heat to do that.
Are there any sound theories for persons and evidence that needed to be destroyed by fire?
If concrete dustifies, wouldn't it turn into swiss cheese, fuel the flames with compressed blowing air, like a rocket stove? I have never heard of flammable concrete, but the porous nature of it could certainly have fanned the flames.
The steel did not turn molten and there was no "underground pool of molten metal". Many people and rescue crew were present at the ground throughout the entire time since it wasn't "too hot to approach".
The steel along with the concrete turned to dust.
Do your research. Your statements are factually incorrect.
https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0405/ofr-01-0405.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn2.htm
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/
https://alethonews.com/2014/12/27/molten-
These are sources that remain uncensored today. During the event copious video of molten steel was available, and I distinctly remember seeing that video. If you do actually want to know the facts, you will have to act quickly, because the net is being scrubbed and the evidence is being deleted, people that post it banned, and the truth censored.
If you don't, you need do nothing. You already believe what censors want you to.
Are you serious? The ground was not "too hot".
The first link I provide above reveals surface temperatures of 800 degrees Celsius. Clearly the firefighters in the undated photo above were not on that surface, because that temperature would quickly kill them.
Note that link is from the USG itself, and isn't pulled out of my ass.
Those links don't represent reality. 800 degrees would've fried every single person in those images. If they are not on the "surface", where are they?
Where is this "super hot surface"?
Why are you throwing around links and numbers that have no bearing on reality?
Even if the thermal images are correct (which likely aren't especially since they are from September 16 to 21), it would not be due to conventional heat since no one was burnt and there were millions of unburnt paper throughout.
Sadly, it is not the evidence the links provided discuss that is unrelated to reality, but your own dismissal of it.
Where those guys in the undated, unsourced pics you provided are not standing. You'll note in the first link images that show there were many places that were not heated to that degree. Those are the places where people could stand and work to destroy the crime scene.
Did you not see with your own eyes the molten steel pouring out of the towers?
Did you not read the statements of Loizeau and Tully, experts in demolition that discussed the pools of molten steel?
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/365-faq-5-what-was-the-molten-metal-seen-pouring-out-of-the-south-tower-minutes-before-its-collapse
If you did not read them, or watch the video, or the analysis of professional architects and engineers, that's on you. They're in the links I provided. If you want to know the facts you have them available to you.
At least you now know without a doubt I am not making it up.
Where is this "molten steel"? And more importantly how would "molten anything" turn most of all 7 towers into dust leaving very little rubble, seismic impact, noise, or projectiles?
Where are these "pools of molten steel"?
And why are you appealing to bogus authority figures, "experts", and why are you propping up controlled opposition "AE911Truth"?
Lastly, are you going to provide any evidence?
The evidence of the towers turning to dust is right in front of your eyes, see my 9/11 video you are commenting on...
FYI I have covered the molten disinfo in my video 3 years ago, and you can see it at the 2:49:00 mark of my Part 6 video: https://youtu.be/aDWgsVSo4Oc?t=10139
As for the images I sent earlier, they were on 9/11: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudis323/35365557215/
And the onus is on you to find the 800 degree C pools which were measured a week after 9/11, and you can't just make up claims that "they were destroying the crime scene". The photo I sent had pools of water. If the temperature were even remotely hot the water would boil.
There are many videos just moments after the twin towers fell in which people are walking around just fine right beside the remains and right next to the exact location of the towers. In fact there were survivors stuck inside a Stairwell right next to the towers,and they were stuck for hours. (See the 27:00 mark of the video to see people casually walking around the North Tower).
Okay, just a couple points I can respond to.
First, concrete turning to dust doesn't somehow prevent steel doing something else. They're different materials that respond differently, specifically chemically differently in the presence of thermite.
Nothing reasonably proposed besides incendiary compounds like thermite provides the necessary heat to utterly destroy the tensile strength of the massive steel in the towers, and because it specifically reacts chemically with iron, concrete is not so affected. Ordinary explosives, or even exotic explosives, turned the concrete into dust, while the steel melted and burned.
Experts, while not gods, are experts because they have specific knowledge and experience, and that's what it took to drop the towers into their footprints. 9/11 was done by experts in demolitions.
I listen to experts, at least them as are trustworthy (which excludes them as appear on TV almost completely), because I am expert in almost nothing. I don't just accept what they say, but hear it and do my best to judge it rationally.
That's all ordinary folks can do.
You ask where are the pools of molten steel, but the images in the links and the commentaries discuss this. Generally, after they cooled sufficiently they were sent off to be recycled in Thailand or somewhere. At the time I was aware of the pools (they were in the news for weeks, and I knew burning desks and passports (a joke) didn't provide sufficient heat to create them.
I want to state here that I misinterpreted your responses to me as coming from someone denying 9/11 was a false flag terrorist attack and supporting the official conspiracy theory, which I felt obligated to refute.
I am comfortable disagreeing with you regarding technical details regarding the molten steel and concrete dust. I know there are myriad details reasonable people will never completely agree on regarding just what to have for lunch. How much disagreement has been made unavoidable by the deliberate coverup and destruction of the 9/11 crime scene?
As long as we are both aware 9/11 was a false flag terrorist attack that elements of the USG (and their allies and minions) committed against the American people to precipitate the police state here and permanent state of war in the ME, I am not interested in opposing you regarding technical details of the behaviour of the materials in the towers.
I may not agree on those details, but those aren't the important details that have compromised the security and felicity of America, and the people of the world through the actions of deranged terrorists.
If we agree on that, we agree on the important issue regarding 9/11.
Thanks for sharing your views on 9/11. As for my view, the technical details are everything. 9/11 is about the suppression of free energy technology, holographic projection technology, and weather control technology. The non-existent thermite and non-existent explosives disinformation as well as the non-existent and irrelevant molten nonsense are just attempts to steer the truth movement into dead ends and make it easy for the mainstream media to debunk and laugh at.
While we agree that 9/11 was a false flag terrorist attack committed by rogue elements of government and their minions, I personally witnessed evidence of molten steel, and will not deny the fact of my own experience.
I hope you can moderate your statements so as to not call me a liar.
I am not calling you a liar but I do apologize for stating you were "making stuff up" (I have edited it out from my earlier messages).
I meant to state that what you and others call "molten steel" is not due to conventional heat, and likely isn't even steel; and doesn't even account for the towers turning to dust.
For example, AE911Truth makes the claim that an excavator was picking up "1200 degree C molten metal".
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/365-faq-5-what-was-the-molten-metal-seen-pouring-out-of-the-south-tower-minutes-before-its-collapse
Temperatures anywhere near that hot would've permanently damaged the excavator and prevent it from operating. The hydraulic fluid in the excavator is designed to operate at room temperature and while even below water boiling temperatures would damage the entire system.
https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/772/hydraulic-equipment-reliability
You see the pic. You can determine the temperature from the color.
Do the research, and you can ascertain for yourself that temperature. Any competent blacksmith can inform you.
I have run hydraulic heavy equipment that leaked like a sieve. You're grabbing at straws to confuse the obvious fact that excavator picked up red hot steel.
Are you serious or just willfully ignorant?
Not everything that glows is hot. And regardless, a few pieces of glowing metal does not turn the towers into dust.
Dear @valued-customer, I propose you a short exercise of CRITICAL THOUGHT in three questions, simple and effective:
If you prefer to believe (presumed) authority, you are free to do so... but do the beliefs spread by AE911Truth go against the logic and evidence of the facts?
Incendiary charges would have been internal to the structure, where the steel frame was, and not visible from without. I am absolutely convinced nothing that should have been in the towers after the jets struck them could have caused them to fall as they did without incendiary charges cutting the steel beams that were designed to withstand, specifically, a plane striking them. Building 7 didn't even have a plane strike it.
Enormous heat isn't what disintegrated the concrete. Shock from high explosives does that. Chemical reactions incendiary formulations cause do create enormous heat, and that's what melted the steel. More than one kind of device was necessary, and highly trained demolitions teams executed the attack.
Molten steel, not disintegrated particles of steel, ran liquid out the building on camera. Concrete and 24" thick steel beams are quite different materials, and respond differently to various events.
Molten steel wasn't hypothetical, mythical or illusory. It's visible in video of the event. You might as well ask how those people survived the building collapsing on them as the molten steel. It's obvious and undeniable that steel, molten or otherwise, was not in all places at once during the event, and in the specific places where steel was, people were not.
At least, no one that survived. God's good grace or luck alone accounts for those folks surviving that terrorist attack.
Bad mouth AE911 all you want. That's called an ad hominem attack, and is an attempt to divert from the evidence under discussion to the character of those presenting the evidence.
Doing so only detracts from any evidence you might care to present as well. Other than that the immense amounts of concrete pulverized into dust were immense, you present zero evidence, and nothing but claims that steel was pulverized into dust.
I don't even grasp any reason to make such nonsensical claims except to poison the well of facts researchers seek to present. Might as well claim aliens planted mini nukes and that the planes were holographs while death rays from space dropped the towers.
Are you going to make those claims too?
You're still pushing the bogus non-existent explosives and AE911truth disinfo?
This isn't the place for your lies and willful ignorance.
@forensic911 I wouldn't worry too much about the disinfo agent "valued-customer". He is just here to push the same usual bogus controlled opposition lies.
Who still needs proof that this was an inside job? ;)
In #911Truth Part 14 I’ve compiled the only complete picture of what actually happened to "Building 7", which is it got turned to dust from inside-out for 7 hours before falling like a soft hollow shell.
View video notes on the Hive blockchain: https://peakd.com/history/@mes/911truth-part-14-building-7-turning-to-dust-for-over-7-hours-fast-forward-45x-speed
View Full Video Series: https://peakd.com/truth/@mes/911