The BIGGEST Nail In Theory of Relativity's Coffin, Is About To Be Found
Scientist will soon stumble upon the "Galactic Internet".
And this will stick a fork in the Theory of Relativity. It is done.
Ivory tower physicists have been ignoring all of the disproofs of the Theory of Relativity, but this discovery, will so easily make it apparent that Relativity is completely wrong.
This "Galactic Internet" is an aether phenomena. Where, alien races communicate across the universe in real time. Almost instantaneous from one side of the universe to the other.
This will do two things. Humans will develop a wireless internet that everyone on the planet can use just by having a special antenna. The other thing is that EVERYONE will know that the speed of light is not a limit as Einstein posited.
The Aether
The Luminiferous Aether is a field that permeats all matter. It may be the space, before space exists. The structure that puts atoms in a location.
Tesla said that the Aether shares the properties of gases, liquids and solids.
You know how sound travels in the air? You can see the lightning flash, and then a few seconds and you hear the thunder. The speed of sound, through the air) is quite slow. Now, if you compare that to the speed of sound through a liquid, the speed through a liquid is much faster, and goes much further (see whale songs) And sound is even faster in a solid. In a solid, the speed is so quick that it gets tricky to measure.
In the aether, it appears that light travelling is akin to sound travelling through the air. The speed of light is the slowest method of travel in the aether.
What these scientists will do is figure out how to "knock" on the aether. Like you would hit a piece of metal with a hammer.
They won't be able to measure the speed of propagation.
There are people already talking on the line
Imagine getting a new phone, just invented, and finding people are already talking on it. And in some language you don't know.
This is what we are going to see.
Aliens are already communicating this way. And after we discover this, we will wonder why we never though of this before. (It has to do with throwing out Tesla, and propping up Einstein)
Once we get the receiver worked out, we will start getting all kinds of data. It will take us years, probably decades to decode any of it. And then more time for linguists to work out the language.
Of course, we will be being visited by aliens, and they may give us hints on translation.
They may in fact come here very soon to tell us how to be polite while using the phone. Like, hang up the *@#$ phone, when you are not using it.
Einstein's Speed of Light Is Toast
One of the first things that will be apparent is that this is A LOT faster than the speed of light.
We currently do not have silicon chips that are fast enough to work as a timer for the speed of a transmission. Across the earth, it will seem to be instantaneous. And it will not be until we start talking to alien races clear across the universe that we will start to see that it is not instantaneous, and that it is just very fast. We are talking trillionths of a second.
What Einstein hated, despised, about Quantum Mechanics is that it was "Spooky action at a distance." And here, we will see that laid bare. Things happening far faster than the speed of light.
And since Einstein's theories start with the premise that the speed of light is constant, and that nothing can accelerate past that speed, than the discovery of knocking on the aether will show that Einstein's theories are complete bunk.
Of course, my favorite part of this discovery is that it will bring internet to everyone on earth, no matter where they are. No more wires. No more worrying about "bad" nations cutting fiber-optic cables. No more worrying about your internet provider dropping you because you said bad things on the internet. The govern-cements will no longer be able to control/censor the ethernet.
Thanks Musk, it was nice of you to make Starlink, but it will be no longer needed in a short while.
Of course, this discovery will quickly destroy what is left of Modern Materialistic Physics. Instead of seeing everything as grit; a bunch of balls bouncing around, we will move to aether theories, and an ontological view of how the universe works.
Say so long to the idea that the universe is slowly winding down in an entropic crash. The universe is much bigger, and much more important, than to be just a clock winding down.
Oh boy, really looking forward to such times, I reckoned that moment isn't that far away.
Is this aether located at the same dimension with the zero energy thing or they are more or less on different dimensions?
The both seem to be aether phenomena. But, we have barely scratched the surface in that research. So, it may be very different, or completely the same. Like marbles of a different color.
Right. Or like solids and liquids, both physical yet different properties.
Hopefully, it wouldn't be something so remote or foreign that we wouldn't be able to establish reference points or analogies from what's already familiar to us.
Unfounded and insuperable claims of magic, rather than reasonably couching such speculation as hypothetical, and lacking replicable observation, seem rather pointless to me. I assume this has something to do with Kozyrev's work, but I have not ascertained anything non-standard, nor support for a lumeniferous aether, there, yet. I only just learned of him yesterday, and note his work was confounded by the Soviet polity that produced Lysenkoism, an unfortunate political circumstance that immediately suggests propaganda afflicted his work, being necessary to his survival. The Golden ratio in no way implies an aether, but a fundamental property of vibration that is revealed across expressions of the myriad fields and forces as spirals and fractals. You do mention Tesla, whose genius cannot be disputed by anyone reasonable, but whose admonition to consider things in terms of vibrations remains quite confounding to folks uncomprehending of what particles actually are, and again, relates to no aether, lumeniferous or not. His work is clearly consilient with the Standard model and modern physics, not negating or in any disagreement with it.
Certainly there are shortcomings in the Standard model, but in discussion with physicists they have pointed out that, while the bits and pieces that have been assembled over the last century to create it all concatenate to support it, they do not suggest it is in any way complete, but quite to the contrary, note fundamental issues of cosmological interpretation can involve very small matters that propagate presently inexplicable immense properties of the universe. This raises an extraordinarily high bar to any extension or alteration of the Standard model, because of that enormous complexity and necessity of consilience with all of it - or replacing all of it - to be superable. Therein lies the 'spooky action at a distance' that betrays the incapacity of humanity, because a consilient resolution of classical physics and quantum physics remains inexpressible.
There remains, rather than a closing of the ideological ranks of physics, a fervent ferment of questioning of basal assumptions, seeking to add to it or dial it back, and a rational commitment to demonstrable and replicable observations. Mere mathematical constructs or bare hypotheses it is not, though from such it springs through replicable demonstration. A vast and bewildering variety of hypotheses have been proposed to further, alter, or replace the Standard model, including aethereal models, but have not been borne out by demonstrable observations.
Bare assertions are the foundation of your aethereal conjecture. You state instead of being superable on demonstrable observations and rational expressions physicists would find it incalculable. This rather suggests magical thinking is the source of these claims you are making, and this is directly in contradiction to the work of Tesla, and the physics that are demonstrated to us in concrete form daily, and by which we here communicate. It is silly to assert without evidence replacing the entirety of the Standard model and millions of man years of experiment, observation, and demonstrated functionality. It would be just as reasonable to claim you can project nails into wood without banging on them with a hammer, which I do not think you do, because you have banged many nails with hammers, and your poor thumbs have vouchsafed to you the soundness of the principles involved, as have mine. We can agree on these physics because we have observed them demonstrated. Why assert fantasies in place of observation?
The Standard model of physics is not 'balls bouncing around', but is a description of fields and vibrations - exactly as Tesla averred. Initial research and conceptualization of physical properties used the appellation particles, and even as understanding evolved into fields and vibrations this was artistically represented as balls in schematics explaining physics to people. Communicating the interrelationships of loci of interaction by representing them as balls in illustrations enables teaching physics without having to bear in mind too much complexity. It's just a metaphor, and like the cover of a book does not convey the understanding therein contained.
No competent living physicist suggests there are any minute balls bouncing around. A diagram of a thing is not the thing. A description of a thing is not the thing. The word particle does not mean what you say you think it means, but is a relic of the evolution of physics, which did indeed come from thinking of bits of stuff we perceive as material, but has long since moved past that to refer to loci of interactions of fields and vibrations. Our hammers and the nails we bang on them with are agglomerations of such bits, as we perceive them, and conveying in blueprints interactions of fields and vibrations would impossibly render our application of them inconceivable. We necessarily simplify physics in application, and this reflects our nature as evolved to apply physical principles. We have no need to view reality fundamentally, but only to apply consequences of physical principles at scale. It is quite amazing to me such intellectual capacity is potential to any of us at all, suggesting more to existence than meets the eye.
Adding to the misapprehension of the Standard model as involving balls bouncing around the insult of avowing insuperable, never demonstrated magic goes beyond mere incomprehension to fantastic fabrication. Restraining your urge to lay claim to understanding, by the discipline of founding it on demonstrable, replicable observation, would benefit your understanding, IMHO. That restraint must have been fundamental to your work in construction, as it has been mine. Certainly we would not try to fabricate fantastic structures without depending on demonstrable observations of superable methods.
No aether is necessary for an evolution of communications obviating wires, which is ongoing as it is potentiated economically. This doesn't have any potential to exceed the speed of light, and conforms entirely to relativistic physics. By sticking to what is demonstrable we can advance physics and enable technological progress to benefit from economic advances that decentralization potentiates, and I suggest you would benefit your understanding thereby.
Congratulations @builderofcastles! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 76000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts: