RE: [공지] @proxy.token 증인 투표 운영 방침(@proxy.token witness voting policy)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
증인들이 이거 대답해줄지 의문이군요... 지금 골든타임이 지나가는듯.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
증인들이 이거 대답해줄지 의문이군요... 지금 골든타임이 지나가는듯.
저스틴에게 투표 했더니 의견이 달리기 시작합니다.
역시... 힘을 보여줘야 대화가 되는듯. 특히 상대가 저럴수록.
@ glory7, 나는 항상 Splinterlands에서 당신과 싸우는 것을 즐깁니다. 그러나 나는 꼭두각시 인형 증인에 대한 투표가 큰 실수라고 걱정하고 있습니다. 목격자로부터 단기간에 양보를받을 수 있지만 전체 네트워크가 손실 될 위험이 있습니다.
Steem 커뮤니티는 일반적인 위협에 대해 이전과는 다른 방식으로 통합되었습니다. 지금 우리는 우리의 공통된 근거를 우리의 차이점이 아니라 사용해야합니다.
@glory7, I always enjoy battling you in Splinterlands. But I am worried voting for the sock-puppet witnesses is a major mistake. You may get a few short-term concessions from witnesses, but at the risk of losing the entire network.
The Steem community has united like never before against a common threat. This is a time we should use our common ground not our differences.
thank you for the reply. I have voted for other witnesses as well.
I am having conversation with other people including witnesses, and for now proxy.token has agreed on putting several non-tron witnesses to prevent hard-fork so that we earn time to discuss.
Great I think that is a smart move. Having the Tron witnesses possess a super-majority threatens the decentralization of the network. Were Tron to hardfork to immediately return the vested exchange tokens that would amount to a permanent tarnish on the neutrality of the blockchain. And they'd likely introduce unforeseen issues into the codebase. So I agree it's essential Tron witnesses don't gain a super-majority while the community decides on the best path forward.