The inconvenient facts about the "coronavirus pandemic"

Another inconvenient fact. 2017 vs 2020 in excess mortality in Europe which goes to show that the current lockdown of Europe got nothing to do with a "virus" and that what is at play at the moment is other agendas.

2017 vs 2020 in excess mortality in Europe

About EuroMOMO
"The overall objective of the original European Mortality Monitoring Project was to design a routine public health mortality monitoring system aimed at detecting and measuring, on a real-time basis, excess number of deaths related to influenza and other possible public health threats across participating European Countries."
Source: https://www.euromomo.eu/slices/map_2017_2020.html

Here is another inconvenient fact that Jon Rappoport reported on at the beginning of this "pandemic" that partly explain why people fall ill and die in China due to pneumonia because of bad nutrition, pollution and a toxic environment.

"Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in adults and children in China [4]. In urban areas, pneumonia is the fourth leading cause of death, and in rural areas pneumonia is the leading cause of death [5], [6]. A recent article in the Chinese literature estimated that each year in China there are 2.5 million patients with pneumonia and that 125,000 (5%) of these patients die of pneumonia-related illness [5]. A 2008 global review by Rudan and colleagues estimated that there were 21.1 million new cases of clinical pneumonia annually in China in children under 5 years of age (0.22 episodes/person-year), which is second only to India in burden (43.0 million new cases, 0.37 episodes/person-year) [3]. Available estimates of the burden of childhood pneumonia in China vary widely, and pneumonia accounts for an estimated 17% of all child deaths in China and 67% of all childhood pneumonia deaths in the Western Pacific region [3], [6], [7].Pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in adults and children in China [4]. In urban areas, pneumonia is the fourth leading cause of death, and in rural areas pneumonia is the leading cause of death [5], [6]. A recent article in the Chinese literature estimated that each year in China there are 2.5 million patients with pneumonia and that 125,000 (5%) of these patients die of pneumonia-related illness [5]. A 2008 global review by Rudan and colleagues estimated that there were 21.1 million new cases of clinical pneumonia annually in China in children under 5 years of age (0.22 episodes/person-year), which is second only to India in burden (43.0 million new cases, 0.37 episodes/person-year) [3]. Available estimates of the burden of childhood pneumonia in China vary widely, and pneumonia accounts for an estimated 17% of all child deaths in China and 67% of all childhood pneumonia deaths in the Western Pacific region [3], [6], [7]."

"The studies included in this review reported pneumonia incidence for children <5 years of age (0.06–0.27 episodes per person-year from 1985 to 2008) that was similar or less than what has been estimated for China (0.22 episodes per person-year in 2008) [3]. Although the studies reported a wide range of pneumonia mortality estimates (184–1,223 deaths per 100,000 population), these are consistent with pneumonia remaining the leading cause of childhood mortality in China [7]. "

"The improved detection and recognition of pneumonias following the SARS, avian influenza and 2009 influenza H1N1 epidemics could lead to more cases of pneumonia being promptly identified and treated. Large scale programs to introduce less polluting cookstoves in China have led to decreases in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [57], [58]; studies from other countries suggest that reductions in exposure to indoor air pollution from solid fuels used for cooking can also lead to fewer cases of pneumonia [59]. Other strategies, including better access to care, improved hygiene, and better nutrition may need strengthening to effectively reduce the incidence of pneumonia in China [60]."
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0011721

Translated from German

"The scaremongering is irresponsible!

In my view, there is no evidence of a causal link between virus detection and disease, except in the minds of virologists and those who listen to them in an increasingly fear-driven society. According to the laboratory test, everyone can be virus-positive - and be completely healthy and stay that way. It does not open to me that the current laboratory tests can say anything about the cause of a disease - or health.

I therefore proclaim:

There is no evidence of a disease-causing coronavirus SARS-CoV-2
Rather, there are questionable laboratory tests that apparently have never been properly calibrated
The virologists rightly claim absolute sovereignty when making a diagnosis as soon as one of their questionable laboratory tests is positive.
There is also a general unwillingness in all of conventional medicine to request a proper differential diagnosis.
There is no real technical discussion on the issue of virus detection and the real causes of frequent serious respiratory diseases

To change that, I hereby proclaim a reward of 100,000 euros to be paid to the person who can present me a scientific publication on a successful attempt to infect with the specific SARS-CoV-2. The attempt at infection must have reliably led to respiratory diseases in the test subjects.

Deadline for the payment of 100,000 euros

the day when I have to publicly admit that I was wrong about someone who has presented me with a valid scientific publication that meets my requirements, or
the day on which a court finally ordered me to pay the prize money.

After the cut-off date, I will initially pay the person providing the evidence within 10,000 euros and the rest within one year.

If no such evidence is presented to me by December 31, 2020, the public bet will expire. The amount collected up to that point will then be used in full for phase 2 of my public bet. I will announce what it is on January 1, 2021."
https://www.impfkritik.de/pressespiegel/2020032201.html"

"In this article, I’ll present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus. I’m talking about fatal flaws in the test.

Because case numbers are based on those tests (or no tests at all), the whole “pandemic effect” has been created out of fake science.

In a moment of truth, a propaganda pro might murmur to a colleague, “You know, we’ve got a great diagnostic test for the virus. The test turns out all sorts of results that say this person is diseased and that person is diseased. Millions of diseased people. But the test doesn’t really measure that. The test is ridiculous, but ridiculous in our favor. It builds the picture of a global pandemic. An excuse to lock down the planet and wreck economies and lives…”

The widespread test for the COVID-19 virus is called the PCR. I have written much about it in past articles.

Now let’s go to published official literature, and see what it reveals. Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating."
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/03/30/corona-creating-the-illusion-of-a-pandemic-through-diagnostic-tests/

Statement by the WHO Jan 14, 2020

"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China"
https://twitter.com/who/status/1217043229427761152?lang=en

"The federal government is classifying the deaths of patients infected with the coronavirus as COVID-19 deaths, regardless of any underlying health issues that could have contributed to the loss of someone’s life.

Dr. Deborah Birx, the response coordinator for the White House coronavirus task force, said the federal government is continuing to count the suspected COVID-19 deaths, despite other nations doing the opposite."
https://nypost.com/2020/04/07/feds-classify-all-coronavirus-patient-deaths-as-covid-19-deaths/

Very good watch that exposes the many falsities of current events like the lack of evidence of the very existence of the "virus" starting with China, the faulty tests, the bad statistics based on assumptions, the problems with computer models when doing projections and much more.

"US Doctor: How can you make a vaccine for something never proven to exist? A must-watch"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VJLJNyExTVjR/

"Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being manipulated

Dr. Bukacek is a longtime Montana physician with over 30 years' experience practicing medicine. Signing death certificates is a routine part of her job.

In this brief video, Dr. Bukacek blows the whistle on the way the CDC is instructing physicians to exaggerate COVID 19 deaths on death certificates. "

If people care to know what the German New Medicine(GNM) thinks about "COVID-19" then here you go.

Hint!: They do not believe in the existence of a "virus".

"Over the last month I have received countless e-mails asking what the COVID-19 “pandemic” is all about so I thought it might be a good idea to blog about the topic rather than to explain what the GNM slant is on the subject to each and every one that asked the question."

COVID-19 Part I
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-i/

COVID-19 Part II Testing for a virus
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-ii-testing-for-a-virus/

COVID-19 Part III – A Little Science
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-iii-a-little-science/

COVID-19 Part IV – Statistics in Perspective
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-iv-statistics-in-perspective/

COVID-19 Part V – The Agenda
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-v-the-agenda/

COVID-19 Part VI – What is wrong with this picture?
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-vi-what-is-wrong-with-this-picture/

COVID-19 Part VII – Connecting the dots
https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-vii-connecting-the-dots/

Here is a video related to this discussing the view of GNM regarding "COVID-19".

"GNM and Covid-19"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uj7LxzAyShjl/

Great post - I only just found you on Hive from an old Steemit post following now

"Lies, Damned Lies and Coronavirus Statistics

The numbers are in on the great Covid-19 pandemic . . . but unfortunately those numbers are unreliable. From mendacious models and puffed-up projections to dodgy death data and tainted tests, today on The Corbett Report James highlights what the accredited scientists and award-winning researchers are saying about the pandemic pandemonium of 2020."
https://www.corbettreport.com/coronastats/

Andrew Kaufman highlights the lack of evidence of the "COVID-19" by going through multiple studies that claim to have "isolated" it. Just to get it out of the way, someone falling ill and even die does not prove "COVID-19" exist and this video will explain why that is as well.

Dr Andrew Kaufman exposing the 'Covid-19' magic trick - the sleight of hand that transformed society

Anatomy of COVID-19 by Dr. Andrew Kaufman

The amount of doctors around the world that speak out against the unfounded hysteria and lockdown keeps growing everyday.

Here we have Dr Pam Popper who made videos for weeks now trying to share her research into the global fraud that is taking place. Here is her latest video where she share data from various countries around the world.

"Are lockdowns Effective or Necessary? It appears not.

Here are more doctors speaking out.

"12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic"
https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

"10 MORE Experts Criticising the Coronavirus Panic"
https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/

"8 MORE Experts Criticising the Coronavirus Panic"
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/17/8-more-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

"Rashid A. Buttar, graduated from Washington University with a double major in Biology and Theology,before attending medical school at the University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Surgery."
EXCLUSIVE: Dr. Rashid Buttar BLASTS Gates, Fauci, EXPOSES Fake Pandemic Numbers As Economy Collapses

Here is an Italian politician that gets a bit mad at the current fraud of "COVID-19" numbers suggesting that the number game is a way to impose dictatorship.

"The president of Tanzania didn't trust the World Health Organization, so he had fake test samples sent to labs. He took samples from papaya fruits, sheep, goats, birds and other things. Most of them came back positive"

"Coronavirus Pandemic 2020: Environment Omitted

This is a series of hypotheses that explain the omission of obvious environmental factors from the mainstream propaganda with regard to the COVID-19 respiratory disease pandemic, declared by WHO on March 11, 2020. (WHO)"
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/04/COVID2020.html

I found this talk very interesting regarding current events, I strongly encourage people to check it out. The discussion is about the bad science, the useless PCR & antibody tests, the misunderstanding / fraud regarding the existence of ANY "virus", the lack of science for masks & social distancing and more.

"Dr. Sherri Tenpenny & Dr. Andrew Kaufman sit down with award winning film maker/documentarian Marcy Cravat for a discussion. This is the first time these two very outspoken doctors ever got together for a chat. It's just as mind blowing as you would expect! Marcy does a great job asking the relevant questions that are on everyone's mind as well as a few questions that might surprise you."

"Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza"

https://sci-hub.se/https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687

"[Mamaroneck, N.Y.—May 6, 2020] A CBS News crew pulled medical professionals off the floor at the Cherry Medical Center in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to line up in their vehicles so a CBS film crew would have a long line for their COVID-19 coverage.

“Our insider witnessed the whole thing and came to Project Veritas, because he knew we would protect him,” said James O’Keefe, the founder and CEO of Project Veritas.

“The insider told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait for the COVID-19 test,” he said.

In an interview with the insider, O’Keefe asked the insider: “You're telling me you're a hundred percent certain that CBS News, CBS News Corporation--national, staged a fake event. They faked the news. They faked the reality and broadcasted that to all of their audience last Friday on “CBS This Morning.”

The insider said to him: “A hundred percent. Absolutely.”"
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/cbs-news-this-morning-aired-faked-covid-19-drive-through-testing-site-line/

Here is another politician from Italy speaking out against the global fraud that is taking place.

"It is now time for a discussion of antibody testing. Many people now want to know how many have been silently infected in the general population, how many are immune, and how this affects the fatality rate. This requires antibody testing and there is at least as much interest in this now, as there has been in the COVID-19 RT-PCR RNA testing that is used to declare someone infected."
http://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf

"To understand why the Ferguson model was in much need of having peer review of the model and code, look at how his past models have utterly failed. He has a horrible track record.

• 2001: Ferguson model on foot and mouth disease to cull animals to prevent spread. Cost 10 billion pounds, turned out to be "severly flawed"
• 2002: Ferguson predicts Mad Cow disease worse case would be 50,000, then 150,000 deaths. Total deaths were 177.
• 2005: Ferguson claims 200 million could die from bird flu,. Only 282 people died worldwide.
• 2009: Ferguson claimed swine flu had fatality of 0.3-1.5%, lead to 65,00 deaths in UK. Only 457 people died, death rate of 0.026.
• 2020: Ferguson models COVID-19, worst case is 2.2. million dead in US, 500,000 in UK. No one reviewed the code or model prior to governments using it to base decisions. So far model proven false.

A "do nothing" model is basically what Sweden has done. The projected deaths in the US was 0.75 of the population, and the UK was about 0.67% of the population dying. Taking 0.7% of the Swedish population gives 71,610 dead. Is that was happened? No. Sweden has 2,586 deaths.

Ferguson's model was off by an order of 27 when looking at Sweden. That's a gross overestimation of deaths from a 'no nothing' model of governments. Sweden has made recommendations, and people have chosen to isolate or distance at their leisure. But no lockdown measures were implemented. No forced closing of businesses.

This whole Ferguson model was wrong from the get go, it was never peer reviewed, when asked, the code was not open sourced, but kept hidden, and Ferguson ran to Imperial College funded Bill Gates' company Microsoft to redo the code instead of letting other experts review it."
https://peakd.com/hive-122315/@krnel/neil-ferguson-bad-models-and-connections-to-bill-gates

Antibodies debunked by Tracey Northern

The whole vaccine business is built on the very dodgy foundation of a theory called ‘the immune system’. Vaccines are tested for efficacy by measuring antibody levels which everyone believes equates to some form of ‘immunity’ to reinfection.

But what if antibodies were not what we’ve been told? "He said the normal trials on a new vaccine were not possible in Britain because of the relatively small numbers of people who contracted the disease. Instead scientists had tested whether the vaccine produced sufficient antibodies." - Media report on meningitis C vaccine

"FROM REPEATED medical investigations, it would seem that antibodies are about as useful as a black eye in protecting the victim from further attacks. The word "antibody" covers a number of even less intelligible words, quaint relics of Erlich’s side-chain theory, which the greatest of experts, McDonagh, tells us is "essentially unintelligible". Now that the old history, mythology and statistics of vaccination have been exploded by experience, the business has to depend more upon verbal dust thrown in the face of the lay public. The mere layman, assailed by antibodies, receptors, haptophores, etc., is only too pleased to give up the fight and leave everything to the experts. This is just what they want, especially when he is so pleased that he also leaves them lots and lots of real money.
The whole subject of immunity and antibodies is, however, so extremely complex and difficult, especially to the real experts, that it is a relief to be told that the gaps in their knowledge of such things are still enormous.

We can obtain some idea of the complexity of the subject from The Integrity of the Human Body, by Sir Macfarlane Burnet. He calls attention to the fact—the mystery—that some children can never develop any antibodies at all, but can nevertheless go through a typical attack of, say, measles, make a normal recovery and show the normal continuing resistance to reinfection. Furthermore, we have heard for years past of attempts made to relate the amount of antibody in patients to their degree of immunity to infection. The, results have often been so farcically chaotic, so entirely unlike what was expected, that the scandal has had to be hushed up—or put into a report, which is much the same thing (vide M.R.C. Report, No. 272, May 1950, A Study of Diphtheria in Two Areas of Great Britain, now out of print). The worse scandal, however, is that the radio is still telling the schools that the purpose of vaccinating is to produce antibodies. The purpose of vaccinating is to make money!" - Lionel Dole

"Human trials generally correlate "antibody" responses with protection - that is if the body produces antibodies (proteins) which bind to vaccine components, then it must be working and safe. Yet Dr March says antibody response is generally a poor measure of protection and no indicator at all of safety. "Particularly for viral diseases, the 'cellular' immune response is all important, and antibody levels and protection are totally unconnected." - Private Eye 24/1/2002

A "titer" is a measurement of how much antibody to a certain virus (or other antigen) is circulating in the blood at that moment. Titers are usually expressed in a ratio, which is how many times they could dilute the blood until they couldn't find antibodies anymore. So let's say they could dilute it two times only and then they didn't find anymore, that would be a titer of 1:2. If they could dilute it a thousand times before they couldn't find any antibody, then that would be a titer of 1:1000. A titer test does not and cannot measure immunity, because immunity to specific viruses is reliant not on antibodies, but on memory cells, which we have no way to measure. Memory cells are what prompt the immune system to create antibodies and dispatch them to an infection caused by the virus it "remembers." Memory cells don't need "reminders" in the form of re-vaccination to keep producing antibodies. (Science, 1999; "Immune system's memory does not need reminders.") - ACCESS to JUSTICE. MMR10 - IN EUROPE

The theory that the creation of antibodies in the blood indicates that protection against disease has been established is not supported by experience. The Medical Research Council's Report on Diphtheria Outbreaks in Gateshead and Dundee, published in 1950. showed that many of the persons actually in hospital with diphtheria had far more anti-toxin in their blood than was said to be required for complete protection against diphtheria, whilst nurses and others in close contact with diphtheria infection and without sufficient anti-toxin remained immune. - THE BRAINS OF THE INOCULATED Speech by LILY LOAT

"In order to better grasp the issue of vaccine effectiveness, it would prove helpful for us to go back to the early theoretical foundation upon which current vaccination and disease theories originated. In simplest terms, the theory of artificial immunization postulates that by giving a person a mild form of a disease, via the use of specific foreign proteins, attenuated viruses, etc., the body will react by producing a lasting protective response e.g., antibodies, to protect the body if or when the real disease comes along.

This primal theory of disease prevention originated by Paul Ehrlich--from the time of its inception--has been subject to increasing abandonment by scientists of no small stature. For example not long after the Ehrlich theory came into vogue, W.H. Manwaring, then Professor of Bacteriology and Experimental Pathology at Leland Stanford University observed:
I believe that there is hardly an element of truth in a single one of the basic hypothesis embodied in this theory. My conviction that there was something radically wrong with it arose from a consideration of the almost universal failure of therapeutic methods based on it . . . Twelve years of study with immuno-physical tests have yielded a mass of experimental evidence contrary to, and irreconcilable with the Ehrlich theory, and have convinced me that his conception of the origin, nature, and physiological role of the specific 'antibodies' is erroneous.33

To afford us with a continuing historical perspective of events since Manwaring's time, we can next turn to the classic work on auto-immunity and disease by Sir MacFarlane Burnett, which indicates that since the middle of this century the place of antibodies at the centre stage of immunity to disease has undergone "a striking demotion." For example, it had become well known that children with agammaglobulinemia--who consequently have no capacity to produce antibody--after contracting measles, (or other zymotic diseases) nonetheless recover with long-lasting immunity. In his view it was clear "that a variety of other immunological mechanisms are functioning effectively without benefit of actively produced antibody."34

The kind of research which led to this a broader perspective on the body's immunological mechanisms included a mid-century British investigation on the relationship of the incidence of diphtheria to the presence of antibodies. The study concluded that there was no observable correlation between the antibody count and the incidence of the disease." "The researchers found people who were highly resistant with extremely low antibody count, and people who developed the disease who had high antibody counts.35 (According to Don de Savingy of IDRC, the significance of the role of multiple immunological factors and mechanisms has gained wide recognition in scientific thinking. [For example, it is now generally held that vaccines operate by stimulating non-humeral mechanisms, with antibody serving only as an indicator that a vaccine was given, or that a person was exposed to a particular infectious agent.])

In the early 70's we find an article in the Australian Journal of Medical Technology by medical virologist B. Allen (of the Australian Laboratory of Microbiology and Pathology, Brisbane) which reported that although a group of recruits were immunized for Rubella, and uniformly demonstrated antibodies, 80 percent of the recruits contracted the disease when later exposed to it. Similar results were demonstrated in a consecutive study conducted at an institution for the mentally disabled. Allen--in commenting on herb research at a University of Melbourne seminar--stated that "one must wonder whether the . . . decision to rely on herd immunity might not have to be rethought.36

As we proceed to the early 80s, we find that upon investigating unexpected and unexplainable outbreaks of acute infection among "immunized" persons, mainstream scientists have begun to seriously question whether their understanding of what constitutes reliable immunity is in fact valid. For example, a team of scientist writing in the New England Journal of Medicine provide evidence for the position that immunity to disease is a broader bio-ecological question then the factors of artificial immunization or serology. They summarily concluded: "It is important to stress that immunity (or its absence) cannot be determined reliable on the basis of history of the disease, history of immunization, or even history of prior serologic
determination.37

Despite these significant shifts in scientific thinking, there has unfortunately been little actual progress made in terms of undertaking systematically broad research on the multiple factors which undergird human immunity to disease, and in turn building a system of prevention that is squarely based upon such findings. It seems ironic that as late as 1988 James must still raise the following basic questions. "Why doesn't medical research focus on what factors in our environment and in our lives weaken the immunesystem? Is this too simple? too ordinary? too undramatic? Or does it threaten too many vested interests . ." - Dr Obomsawin MD

This may be news to many but it is in fact long known in medical circles which means the vaccine industry is committing fraud (apart from murder) and we really need a moratorium on the whole vaccine issue NOW.

"A Study on Infectivity of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Carriers

Results: The median contact time for patients was four days and that for family members was five days. Cardiovascular disease accounted for 25% among original diseases of patients. Apart from hospital staffs, both patients and family members were isolated medically. During the quarantine, seven patients plus one family member appeared new respiratory symptoms, where fever was the most common one. The blood counts in most contacts were within a normal range. All CT images showed no sign of COVID-19 infection. No severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was detected in 455 contacts by nucleic acid test.

Conclusion: In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection and we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak. "
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32405162/

"Recently, a report on the COVID-19 crisis was leaked from the German Interior Ministry.

The report states quite definitely that the whole threat has been overblown. It was a “false alarm.”

World media have taken very little notice.

As sott.net reveals, the report, “Analysis of the Crisis Management”, was authored by “a scientific panel appointed by the interior ministry and composed by external medical experts from several German universities.”

“The report was the initiative of a department of the interior ministry called Unit KM4 and in charge [of] the ‘Protection of critical infrastructures’.”

“Some of the [leaked] report key passages are:

• The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.
• The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).
• Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there has been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25,100 in Germany] during the influenza wave 2017/18.
• The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
• A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.”

Of course, here in America, we’re grateful that the New York Times, the Washington Post, and all the major television networks have been trumpeting news of the explosive findings in the leaked German report. Our major media have been on top of this story from the beginning, with page-one headlines and lead items every night on TV news broadcasts. We’re grateful to Tony Fauci, Deb Birx, and the whole coronavirus task force crew for highlighting what’s been happening in Germany in their daily press conferences. We appreciate the hour-to-hour updates on Germany from the CDC and the WHO. Bill Gates’ breathless reports on YouTube, demolishing the official COIVD narrative and praising the German leaker, have warmed our hearts.

WAIT. Sorry. For a minute there, I thought I was writing PR releases for…some honest US government agency and media consortium that don’t actually exist. My mistake. Wrong country, wrong world, wrong universe.

Let me try to go back into the theater where the population is watching the movie called “COVID-19, Terrifying Pandemic.”"
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/05/covid-19-a-movie-on-the-screen-of-life/

"Mask wearers of the world, take them off—you have nothing to lose but your insanity…

Journal of the American Medical Association, April 17, 2020, “Masks and Coronavirus Disease”: “Unless you are sick, a health care worker, or caring for someone who has COVID-19, medical masks (including surgical face masks and N95s) are not recommended.”

At Children’s Health Defense, JB Handley has written an excellent article, “LOCKDOWN LUNACY: The Thinking Person’s Guide.” Here are two highlights from his section on masks:

“May 29, the World Health Organization announced that masks should only be worn by healthy people if they are taking care of someone infected with COVID-19:”

“’If you do not have any respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough or runny nose, you do not need to wear a mask,’ Dr. April Baller, a public health specialist for the WHO, says in a video on the world health body’s website posted in March. ‘Masks should only be used by healthcare workers, caretakers or by people who are sick with symptoms of fever and cough’.”

“…I often see this study from 2015 in the BMJ cited: ‘A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers’, and it bears repeating, since MOST of the masks I see people wearing in the community right now are cloth masks. Not only are these masks 100% ineffective at reducing the spread of COVID-19, but they can actually harm you. As the researchers explain:”

“’This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection…’”

Of course, I understand that when people are conspiracy whackos wearing their masks, they don’t respond well to facts, even when those facts come from the very organizations they believe in with religious fervor."
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/06/09/citizens-wearing-masks-whacko-conspiracy-theorists/

"Erin Marie Olszewski is a Nurse-turned-investigative journalist, who has spent the last few months on the frontlines of the coronavirus pandemic, on the inside in two radically different settings. Two hospitals. One private, the other public. One in Florida, the other in New York.

And not just any New York public hospital, but the "epicenter of the epicenter" itself, the infamous Elmhurst in Donald Trump's Queens. As a result of these diametrically opposed experiences, she has the ultimate "perspective on the pandemic". She has been where there have been the most deaths attributed to Covid-19 and where there have been the least."

Here is Nicole Sirotek, another nurse from NY that speaks out about the mismanagement of patients that lead to their deaths.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u1V3O6KD9Hdl/

"Misinterpretation of Virus II - beginning and end of the corona crisis" - by Dr Stefan Lanka

Translated version(rough translation)

Original version(in German)

Reply sent by the National Virus Reference Laboratory in Ireland regarding the inquiry into the scientific evidence for the isolation and purification of the claimed "SARS-CoV-2".

This is just a copy and paste job from the email sent to Tracey Northern by James McCumiskey and arranged in descending order. https://steemit.com/virus/@northerntracey/foi-requests-for-proof-of-a-novel-coronavirus-and-the-replies-so-far

"In this episode of Truthiverse, David Crowe features as the very first special guest - and with good reason.

Exploiting his background in biology and many years of medical study, David and I discuss some of the "secret" history of epidemics and dig into the information about viruses - including "covid-19" - that is suppressed by the government, medical system, and mainstream media as a matter of policy.

David's expertise and decades of research allow us to shed light on a confusing, multi-layered situation with many competing opinions.

We talk "covid-19", SARS, HIV, and why the foundations of modern virus theory are much more fragile than we have been led to believe. You won't believe your ears when you find out what the medical system conveniently "forgot" to tell you about many of our supposedly most dangerous "contagious" diseases.

This wide-ranging conversation provides crucial background and context to see "covid-19" in a whole new light. Prepare to be shocked and perhaps even angered by what we reveal.

Remember to like and subscribe if you find value in this work. Your support is gratefully received!"

Audio podcast can be found here: https://truthiverse.com/2

"A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐮𝐬 on that continent.

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜."

"The pair also confirmed “𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐟 that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

He added that:

What all of the pathologists said is that 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐮𝐬. I will repeat that: 𝐧𝐨 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐮𝐬."
https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/02/no-one-has-died-from-the-coronavirus-president-of-the-bulgarian-pathology-association/

It's good to see that the global fraud is being exposed by more people and that they start to seek justice where public officials will be held accountable for the death and destruction which they have created.

"Germany - The COVID-19 Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee - Start Conference 03rd July 2020

"We will not be delayed any longer. We citizens have the power. We are doing it", with these words Heiko Schöning announced the Extra-Parliamentary Corona Investigation Committee (ACU) on 31st May 2020 in Stuttgart in front of 5000 demonstrators. On 3rd July 2020 the ACU started with an information conference in several languages.

All citizens, national and international, can make suggestions for experts and witnesses ([email protected]).

The speakers of the ACU (Heiko Schöning, Bodo Schiffmann, Martin Haditsch) invite the experts and witnesses to the public hearing of evidence."
https://www.bitchute.com/video/095tr9izHUGZ/

For more details, please visit https://acu2020.org/international/

Dr Robert Young speaks out about COVID & other matters part 1
Dr Robert Young speaks out about COVID & other matters part 2

Dr Robert Young also wrote an article in January 2020 regarding the problems of germ theory called "Dismantling The Viral Theory" that can be found in the link below.

"Dismantling The Viral Theory
Has the existence of polio, measles, hiv, cmv, ebv, hep c, ebola, the flu, zika and now corona viruses been demonstrated and scientifically proven?"
https://phoreveryoung.wordpress.com/2020/01/25/dismantling-the-viral-theory/

Official challenge regarding the existence of "SARS-CoV-2" that is claimed to cause "COVID-19".

Letter: "Viral challenge to Boris Johnson"

Pdf: "Where is the evidence for the existence of the ‘novel coronavirus’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’?"

Crowdfunding related to this: "The Coronavirus Act 2020 is Null and Void!"

"As I have previously stated, when it comes to COVID, there is not 1 virus, not 1 cause and not 1 disease. Part of the psy-op is to convince you that there is a single killer virus out there, and that if we could just find and isolate this virus, we could destroy it and rescue the world from this dreaded pandemic. It’s an illusion.

Young reveals that what the WHO has called “COVID” is a biochemical poisoning of bodily fluids causing cellular membrane breakdown and genetic mutation. This means deterioration of cell membranes, due to a toxic environment, created due to a compromised bioterrain (see here for the background on bio terrain, and the importance of terrain theory over germ theory). COVID is not a viral condition. COVID symptoms are circulatory problems that stem from pathological blood coagulation. In technical medical terms, this coagulation (lumping and sticking together of red blood cells) is known as DIC or Disseminated Intervascular Coagulation. Blood coagulation means the blood changes from a liquid to a gel or semi-solid state, forming a blood clot. This can be potentially dangerous, because when blood coagulates or clots, it can get stuck and prevent blood flow. In this state the blood does not fully and freely intake oxygen and release waste products. When blood clots, it can’t enter the capillary system to facilitate the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide. Young stresses that blood coagulation signals:

1. the inability of the blood to remove its waste products and pick up oxygen; and
2. that the blood is clotting inside the vascular system, so that acids can not be removed and thus accumulate, leading to toxic overload and disease.

People suffering from this kind of pathological blood coagulation will experience oxygen deprivation (hypoxia or under oxygenation). They will likely feel short of breath and have symptoms identical to high altitude sickness. Not coincidentally, this is exactly in line with what Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell from New York said when he went public months ago (during the peak of COVID fear) to tell the world about how his patients seemed to be suffering not from a viral pneumonia, but from altitude sickness."

"I suggest you read my article Deep Down the Virus Rabbit Hole – Question Everything for the background to the true nature of viruses, exosome theory and much more, since it will explain a lot of this. Young continues:

“These biological transformations of the body cells [are] the genesis of all bacteria, all yeast, all mold, all bacteriophages, all endotoxins or cell fragments, exotoxins and mycotoxins or metabolic acidic waste. The cause of pleomorphism or cellular transformations of the body cells affecting the cell membrane and its genetic matter is the result of an acidic lifestyle including diet. The disturbing contributing factors include all electrical and magnetic fields (EMF 1G to 5G), all acidic foods, all acidic fluids, all environmental toxins, including carbon monoxide, all insecticides, pesticides and herbicides found in non-organic foods (i.e., glyphosate), all acidic water (pH below 7.4), all acidic legend drugs including all antibiotics and drugs that contain HCL, all recreational drugs including marijuana (THC is an oxidant), all acidic supplements including all enzymes, all probiotics, all algae, all mushrooms, or all acidic supplements and foods, all acidic thoughts, all acidic feelings and all acidic beliefs.

This is the one cause of ALL sickness and disease and there is no other cause. Once again, the one sickness and one disease is the over-acidification of the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium due to an inverted way of living, eating, drinking, breathing, thinking, feeling and believing.”

Young then makes the startling claim that viruses do not exist. This is a little different from what others such as virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Andy Kaufman have said (namely that viruses exist but that there is no evidence they cause disease):

“All viruses DO NOT EXIST and therefore do NOT cause infections. All infections are born in us and from us and are outfections of the cell due to an acidic fluid environment.”

Young is strong believer in terrain theory over germ theory: that we are ultimately entirely responsible for our state of health, and that we only procure disease when we allow our inner terrain to become acidic, not only through bad food, but through a host of other possible means, including even our habitual feelings and thoughts, which have a tremendous yet often misunderstood and ignored biochemical effect on our bodies."
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/doctor-exposes-the-corona-effect-covid-is-blood-coagulation

More evidence that shows that there are no scientific evidence for the existence of "SARS-CoV-2" that is claimed to be responsible for "COVID-19".

"(CM) have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to various Canadian institutions seeking records that describe the actual isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any diseased patient.

My requests have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” isolation performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.

Thus far (July 20, 2020) 5 Canadian institutions have provided me their final response to my request: Health Canada; the National Research Council of Canada; the University of Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and the Region of Peel (Ontario).

Every institution has indicated the same: that they searched and could locate no record describing the isolation of any “COVID-19 virus”, anywhere, ever. See the above links to access the responses from institutions other than the Region of Peel."
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/region-of-peel-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/

Dr Stefan Lanka Interview July 2020 - "Virologist", molecular and marine biologist. The existence of ANY "virus" refuted.

"Unsubstantiated virus model with artificial gene sequencesThe actual proof of the existence of a new virus is defined when the 'virus' can be 'cultivated'. For this purpose tissues are killed in the laboratory by (unintentional) starvation and poisoning. And because a little "in-game" material is added to this process, the participants believe that the tissue turns into viruses.Of course, they do not ask themselves why, in contrast to the phages, billions of viruses cannot be seen, isolated and their genetic strands isolated intact. So they start to reconstruct the assumed large "genome" of the assumed virus from the short existing gene sequence pieces. With the difference that this act of cultivation leaves large gaps in the reconstruction of the whole genome strand. These are laboriously filled by producing artificial gene sequences to fill the gaps in the model. This is self-deception within the "virological" self-deception."
https://truthseeker.se/wp-content/uploads/Lanka_interview_July-2020-English-Translation.pdf

"The Secretary of State makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 24(2), (4) and (8) of the Coronavirus Act 2020(1).

The Secretary of State, in accordance with section 24(3) of that Act, considers that coronavirus is having, or is likely to have, an adverse effect on the capacity of persons responsible for making national security determinations to consider whether to make, or renew, national security determinations and that it is in the interests of national security to retain the fingerprints or DNA profiles as provided for in these Regulations.

The Secretary of State has consulted the Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric Material in accordance with section 24(6) of that Act. "
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/973/made?view=plain