RE: If not now, when?
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
When you support the deaths of millions of people, don't expect civility.
Also, I didn't even insult you there, snowflake.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
When you support the deaths of millions of people, don't expect civility.
Also, I didn't even insult you there, snowflake.
Well, you claimed I am clueless and now genocidal for no reason. I don't see how this is in any way productive. Your argument is purely ad hominem.
But it's not. You just won't read the scientific information related to the subject and are instead following mass hysteria generated by your pals.
You attack "biological gender" (whatever that means) as a scapegoat to form an argument in defense of climate denial.
What does that mean, by the way? You have no real thesis at all.
How did you come to that conclusion? I read tons of scientific information. I'm also a big fan of thunderf00t, veritasium, and answerswithjoe, all of whom do videos in support of climate change evidence. None of them make the "The Science is Settled" argument.
I listen to them in order to understand the case being made from a scientific perspective. I trust many of their conclusions. When they talk about climate change, I listen to their position and form my own conclusion.
My conclusion is that protection of private property rights is the way to solve the problem morally.
As for the "biological gender" argument, that was an observation, not an attack; I was observing that science is being cherry picked.