RE: ...

Hahahaha... That's one way to classifying science. Turning claims into science. Not even philosophers make claims. But not in my book, and not in any true scientist book, when you 1. listen the whole video 2. hear this guy talking in facts.

To the first point: That's clear, right? Your comment is even more clear. Statements, Claims without any proof. The truth is, the world, as well as the whole covid situation, is much more complex than all the BS about who is right or not. The world is divided into two camps: Those in favour of government rules and 2) those against all this and many of them believe in some form of planning, some form of conspiracy. There is a third group, quite small, but they exist. These are people who believe government rules are based on tunnel visions, and science no answers (yet) to proof the believes of either camp. I belong to this later category. And when one belongs to this category, one needs to be ready for everything. Therefore we shall not downplay covid, and at the same time, we shall be ready to deal with covid for a long time to come (which means: no lockdowns, no shutdown of the economy). Only in time, we know better if covid is indeed more dangerous than anything we know. BTW, I wrote a very long post some time ago what we as governments should have done, and can still do. If you are interested? Here it is: https://hive.blog/hive-114105/@edje/unlock-measurements-i-propose-to-diederik-gommers-member-of-the-team-advising-the-dutch-government

To the second point: science is all possibilities based on numerous assumptions and most often empirical results, but science is never about facts (maybe in mathematics some facts are at play, but that the nature of that science). When practising science and talk in certainties, science becomes opinions, by default. Around covid, lots of studies, but no truth and facts. Only some indications and possibilities.