Is It All About The Technology And Not The Vaccine? Dr. Fauci, His Book, His Truths, His Terms

Tonight while working away listening to Fox News then reflecting back at the end of the video that @ura-soul shared the other night I think I hit upon another angle in the virus debacle. Tonight Fox was talking about Dr. Fauci's new book "Expect the Unexpected: Ten Lessons on Truth, Service, and the Way Forward". At the end of the video shared by ura-soul the doctor, almost appearing besides himself, ask "what's in this vaccine that they feel so compelled to want to stick in everyone's arm". People have speculated on it being a control mechanism to population control but after listening to the description on Fox of Fauci's book it became apparent that we may be missing a piece of the puzzle.

Back in 2012 Fauci was quoted as saying that benefit of gain of function research outweighed the risk of a pandemic:

In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? offering a concrete path to a bright and hopeful future. Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?

Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.

Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern.

That, taken in context with excerpts on the book review may provide another compelling point of view of what this virus is all about.

"With more than three decades spent combating some of the most dangerous diseases to strike humankind— AIDS, Ebola, COVID-19—Dr. Fauci has worked in daunting professional conditions and shouldered great responsibility. The earnest reflections in these pages offer a universal message on how to lead in times of crisis and find resilience in the face of disappointments and obstacles," the Barnes & Noble summary of the book reads.

"Sure to strike a chord with readers, the inspiring words of wisdom in this book are centered around life lessons compiled from hours of interviews, offering a concrete path to a bright and hopeful future."

When I heard that description offered up on Fox what the doctor said at the end of the video hit me, it isn't what's in this vaccine it's about the vaccine's technology. A few weeks ago I wrote about Tal Zaks, Moderna chief executive officer's video on mRNA technology. In the article I mention that basically this technology was going nowhere fast due to moral and ethical concerns of messing with people's cells, at best they were left pandering to people who were facing near death, death or shorten life expectancy due to a serious illness. There may be a few people who may argue moral or ethical concerns under those circumstances but for the vast majority they'd rather stake a chance in an unproven technology than die or let a loved one die. Some in the medical profession though believe this technology holds the key to curing diseases despite their attempts to bring those hopes to fruition. When I heard Ebola and Aids mentioned these were two out of half a dozen experiments to create vaccines using the technology that has failed or proven to be failures. If I remember right it may have been the Ebola vaccines that ended up producing vaccine derived variant, if not it was another prominent virus in a third world country they used this technology that did. Another for rabies injections didn't work out quite well either but a soluble vaccines was showing promise. There was mention of use of this technology to replace a missing protein in children born missing the protein, it didn't actually replace it permanently but repeated injections was working, they were slanted to start studies on children stricken with the disease but then covid happened and they suddenly forgot all about the little Johnnies of the world. They did successfully make a couple of influenza vaccine's using this technology but so far have lacked a viral outbreak to use it on a mass scale. Give the stalemate they were at with this technology, believing this technology held the answer to opening up discovery for cures to diseases maybe this was a way for them to " find resilience in the face of disappointments and obstacles", and "offering a concrete path to a bright and hopeful future". I guess one could say the resulting knowledge would outweigh the risk given that millions of people die from diseases every year, far more on an ongoing basis then what a pandemic would kill. Injecting this technology into every arm in the world would definitely seem to cure the moral and ethical concerns that were holding the technology back. When one can expressly say that researchers express concerns they are being held back by fear the only thing left to do is release that fear.

I don't think anyone can deny that we have more than nine new billionaires whose going to come out of the use of this technology, they'll be writing studies and books for years to come just on the effects this technology had during this viral outbreak and this is only the beginning.

I also personally found the release of this book to be more than just anecdotal, one of Fauci's favorite words. Is Fauci sending a warning that he'll leave on his own terms given his quote in 2012 that, " Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?" Given the title, his past quotes and the use of the word "Truths?" Is Fauci sending out subliminal messaging to all those who were the processes involved in the decision making". If so Fauci may not be liking the idea he's about to get thrown under the bus. What he knows could prove to be shockingly interesting, after all they were using this technology in Aids research. Unless he's ready to go I don't think he's going anywhere fast.