When in science we speak of objectivity we refer - in some way - to verification; that is to say, we refer to confronting the hot knowledge that is obtained in the investigative work (either in the heat of the phenomena, either in the laboratory) with the always stubborn reality. And when we refer to reality we are denoting the instance that determines everything that science assumes as an object (thought, language, emotionality ...). In such a confrontation that is made between the knowledge resulting from the investigative work (which is usually full of zigzagging arbitrariness and rigor) and the judgment exercised by the uncompromising reality, is precisely the key to the epistemological concept called objectivity.
In such a way, then, that saying "verify" and saying "verify" is practically the same ... Ah, but it is good to make it clear that when one says to objectify, objectification, he is not only legitimately carrying with him the aforementioned concept of judgment of the real above all that which is factually gestated in the practical work of the investigation, but is also assuming a principle of supreme importance.
It is that this specific act of verification (of factual verification) does not die in the act itself; it does not die in the simplicity of the confrontational. No. Keep in mind that although the phenomena studied in the world of science carry quotas of reality (they carry quotas of the truth factor), they do not usually reveal by themselves THE REALITY, THE TRUTH. What's more, sometimes they can even cover up. Such a situation (paradoxical, for the rest!) Is linked to the fact that these phenomena in themselves do not embody the factors that give them objective existence, complex determination. Specific phenomena are governed by total factors (general, global) which, on the one hand, make life somewhat outside their limited boundaries, and on the other, in order to be studied and understood in their very broad dimensions, the appeal to the qualified effort of philosophical-scientific speculation.
How to understand in the light of our days, the specific phenomenon of Covid-19 in the light only of the investigations (biochemical, physical ...) carried out by the great western, Russian, Chinese laboratories, in short, without the din of the misfortune in question, the theoretical interpretations capable of clarifying the reasons (until now, hidden) that made such a pandemic possible are not carried out philosophically and scientifically! Reasons of power, of course ... I think it was Garaudy (the reckless French communist philosopher of the 20th century who was characterized by his extreme coherence and inconsistency) who once said that "religious wars" will be imposed in the near future. To this expression, others have been added under a similar style ... "In the 21st century, bacteriological wars will prevail." You have to see the logic involved in the latter! All silence must be broken in that insane induced logic!
- FUENTE DE LAS IMÁGENES: https://pixabay.com/es/photos/sorpresa-asombrado-diversi%C3%B3n-700083/ https://pixabay.com/es/photos/asombrado-mujer-sorprendido-poses-1367421/ https://pixabay.com/es/vectors/a-me-ai-anatom%C3%ADa-2028330/