How is a bad leader perceived?

avatar

image.png
Image source

It is more common to see how a leader is identified more quickly than a bad leader, apart from that, we also see how a leader is identifiable as one of its qualities is to direct and command a group of people, leadership is very common to see it expressed in politics, religion, among other sectors of today's society.

The identification of a bad leader should not be difficult for us to identify it easily, since a bad leader does the opposite of the leader, that is to say, a bad leader does not have an effective communication with his work group, therefore he does not generate a work environment where a group connection prevails, so necessary for the activities that the leader must command in his work place.

The foolishness and bad decisions based on an incapable management make a bad leader spoil the harmonic way of work of the group that he badly directs, all these actions of a bad leader make us conceptualize about the reasons that exist so that a bad leader is convenient and propitious to call him otherwise, if a bad leader acts in a contrary way to what a good leader is, then it would not be so out of date to call him antilider.

An antilider does not believe to be the possessor of a unique truth with the sole intention of getting his own benefits under his position, that is why when we see that a person does not lead properly is because perhaps he is making the mistake of being authoritarian and trying to impose rules and unique styles, without having the right to his leaders to give their opinion about his actions.

The conclusion of this post focused on the antilider, is that it is not very difficult to detect an antilider, because simply with a good follow up, if we see that their actions go in the opposite direction to those of a good leader, then we are in the presence of an antilider.



0
0
0.000
0 comments