Internet Archive Forced To Remove 500,000 Books
Internet Archive fans beg publishers to stop emptying the open library.
As a result of book publishers successfully suing the Internet Archive (IA) last year, the free online library that strives to keep growing online access to books recently shrank by about 500,000 titles.
IA reported in a blog post this month that publishers abruptly forcing these takedowns triggered a "devastating loss" for readers who depend on IA to access books that are otherwise impossible or difficult to access.
To restore access, IA is now appealing, hoping to reverse the prior court's decision by convincing the US Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit that IA's controlled digital lending of its physical books should be considered fair use under copyright law. An April court filing shows that IA intends to argue that the publishers have no evidence that the e-book market has been harmed by the open library's lending, and copyright law is better served by allowing IA's lending than by preventing it.
And they even got a chance:
"We use industry-standard technology to prevent our books from being downloaded and redistributed—the same technology used by corporate publishers," Chris Freeland, IA's director of library services, wrote in the blog. "But the publishers suing our library say we shouldn’t be allowed to lend the books we own. They have forced us to remove more than half a million books from our library, and that’s why we are appealing."
While I wonder, if they loose, ain't one allowed to lend books one owns?
It all comes down to "owning" something again..
They also argued that the takedowns dealt "a serious blow to lower-income families, people with disabilities, rural communities, and LGBTQ+ people, among many others," who may not have access to a local library or feel "safe accessing the information they need in public."
:D
my humble guess you are stretching here; jury position on this will be like, 'personally you are allowed, among your friends and family, but not allowed doing this in public to the strangers - the same position / logic as with musical recordings. Me thinks.
Very sad news actually. This is one of important sites for me.
Welcome to modern dystopia:
You are not allowed to lend the books you own (so just the idea of library is very evil then? xD)
and adobe claims to have the rights/ licenses, basically owns all your photos, you work on in photoshop...
^^
Lets cancel Adobe, ahahah. 😳 But 1st lets cancel USA, or move servers to Nauru island so that free internet will survive free and not just a castrated stump that we get from the judicial system serving American business.
Oh, ich hatte da auch schon manchmal wo reingelesen.
This is a site that I've read many books that I couldn't found elsewhere on the internet! I hope they win the appeal but it doesn't look likely, for-profit organizations could get the upper hand :(
☕️ Hello @! Your post has been recognized by the cXc Music team!
Experience our music map at cXc.world 🔗🌳. Peep plans 👀 in our DHF proposal 👉