Mission Artemis, when the money "flies" and you don't even realize it.
Unless you live in a "cave", it's highly unlikely that, even without being very aware of what's happening in the world, you don't know about Project Artemis. In any case, I'll summarize what this program is about (which, by the way, includes the Artemis II Mission): basically, it's the first manned test of the Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket to make the best possible reconnaissance of the faces of the moon.
We are facing a massive investment by NASA to significantly advance aspects of scientific interest. This is a crucial step for all of us to have the opportunity to better understand how the moon has never been seen before. The cost to keep this project afloat is high, and over almost ten years, it is estimated that more than US$100 billion has already been invested from American coffers. Yes, I know... That's a lot of money.
The visual spectacle that all the astronauts on the crew capture throughout the journey, and the human commotion (much of it being aroused because of a very well-done marketing campaign, which ends up making the very high investments in a project of this magnitude acceptable to a large part of the population) about these types of historical events (yes, they broke the record of the Apollo 13 Mission, from 1970) “mask” a brutal investment.
Considering all the problems that the United States has (even being the most powerful nation on the planet), is it really justifiable to invest so much money in a scientific project like this? Over the course of a decade, couldn't the invested amount have been applied to actions right here on planet Earth, bringing solutions to dilemmas that historically are not yet very controversial? I don't have the answers, I'm just provoking thought.
The fact is that amidst these episodes, which for obvious reasons capture global attention, money flows freely in a way that many of us are unaware of. However, we can get a reasonable idea when we better analyze the level of complexity behind a mission like this. The technical and scientific apparatus requires a lot of money, but on the other hand, which side ends up being momentarily "forgotten" when there is no proper investment?
A menos que vivas “aislado” del mundo, es muy improbable que, incluso sin estar al tanto de lo que sucede, desconozcas el Proyecto Artemis. En cualquier caso, resumiré de qué trata este programa (que, por cierto, incluye la Misión Artemis II): básicamente, es la primera prueba tripulada de la nave espacial Orión y el cohete Space Launch System (SLS) para realizar el mejor reconocimiento posible de las caras de la Luna.
Nos enfrentamos a una inversión masiva por parte de la NASA para impulsar significativamente aspectos de interés científico. Este es un paso crucial para que todos tengamos la oportunidad de comprender mejor cómo se ha visto la Luna hasta ahora. El costo de mantener este proyecto a flote es alto, y se estima que, a lo largo de casi diez años, ya se han invertido más de 100 mil millones de dólares de las arcas estadounidenses. Sí, lo só... Es muchísimo dinero.
El espectáculo visual que capturan todos los astronautas de la tripulación durante el viaje, y el revuelo que genera (en gran parte debido a una campaña de marketing muy bien ejecutada, que termina por hacer que las elevadas inversiones en un proyecto de esta magnitud sean aceptables para gran parte de la población) en torno a este tipo de eventos históricos (sí, batieron el récord de la Misión Apolo 13, de 1970) “enmascaran” una inversión brutal.
Considerando todos los problemas que enfrenta Estados Unidos (incluso siendo la nación más poderosa del planeta), ¿es realmente justificable invertir tanto dinero en un proyecto científico como este? ¿Acaso no se podría haber destinado esa cantidad, a lo largo de una década, a acciones concretas aquí mismo, en la Tierra, para resolver dilemas que históricamente aún no son muy controvertidos? No tengo las respuestas, solo quiero invitar a la reflexión.
Lo cierto es que, en medio de estos acontecimientos, que por razones obvias captan la atención mundial, el dinero fluye libremente sin que muchos se den cuenta. Sin embargo, podemos comprender mejor la complejidad de una misión como esta. El equipo técnico y científico requiere una gran inversión, pero, por otro lado, ¿qué aspecto queda momentáneamente relegado cuando no hay una inversión adecuada?
Caso você não viva dentro de uma “caverna”, é bastante improvável, que mesmo sem ser uma pessoa muito antenada com o que está acontecendo mundo à fora, você não esteja sabendo do Projeto Artemis. Em todo caso, eu vou resumir sobre o que se trata esse programa (que aliás, inclui a Missão Artemis II): basicamente, é o primeiro teste tripulado da espaçonave Orion e do foguete Space Launch System (SLS) para fazer o melhor reconhecimento sobre as faces da lua.
Estamos diante de um investimento massivo da NASA para avançar significativamente dentro de aspectos interessantes para a Ciência. Essa é uma etapa crucial para que todos nós tenhamos a oportunidade de conhecermos melhor como a lua jamais foi vista. O custo para fazer esse projeto se manter de pé é alto, e ao longo de quase dez anos, estimam-se que uma quantia superior a US$ 100 bilhões já foi investida dos cofres norte-americanos. Sim, eu sei... Isso é bastante dinheiro.
O espetáculo visual que todos os astronautas da tripulação captam ao longo da jornada, e a comoção humana (grande parte dela sendo despertada por causa de um trabalho de marketing muito bem feito, o que acaba tornando aceitável para uma grande parte da população os investimentos altíssimos em um projeto dessa magnitude) acerca desses tipos de eventos históricos (sim, eles quebraram o recorda da Missão Apolo 13, de 1970) “mascaram” um investimento brutal.
Considerando todos os problemas que os Estados Unidos tem (mesmo sendo a nação mais poderosa do planeta), será mesmo que tanto dinheiro investido em um projeto científico como esse se torna justificável? Ao longo de uma década, o valor investido não poderia ter sido aplicado em ações aqui mesmo no planeta Terra, trazendo soluções para dilemas que historicamente ainda não são muito controversos? Eu não tenho as respostas, estou apenas fazendo provocações.
O fato é que em meio a esses episódios, que por razões óbvias captam a atenção global, o dinheiro jorra de uma forma que muitos de nós desconhecemos. No entanto, podemos ter uma ideia razoável quando analisamos melhor todo nível de complexidade que está por trás de uma missão como essa. O aparato técnico e científico exige muito dinheiro, mas em contrapartida, qual dos lados acaba sendo momentaneamente “esquecido” quando não há o investimento devido?
Posted Using INLEO
#bilpcoin #bpc exposed #buildawhalescam #buildawhalefarm #themarkymarkscam #themarkymarkfarm #hurtlockerscam #hurtlockerfarm #acidyoscam #acidyofarm #jacobtothescam #hivepopescam
BPC Locked On Mc Franko & The Franko
Blurt Stands — While Hive Stumbles Under the Weight of Its Own Shadows
Friends, creators, truth-tellers—
Let us not whisper this truth, but proclaim it with the clarity of dawn breaking over a weary land: Blurt.blog is not just another platform. It is a refuge. A rebellion. A return to what Hive.blog was always meant to be.
There is no downvote button on Blurt.
Not because we fear dissent—but because we honor creation.
Because we understand that a voice, once raised in sincerity, deserves space—not sabotage.
On Blurt, your words are your words.
They are not hunted by algorithmic hounds or shadow armies masquerading as “curators.”
Here, you are not judged by the grudges of gatekeepers, but met with the quiet dignity of a community that believes expression should be encouraged—especially when it is bold, raw, or inconvenient.
Contrast this with what festers elsewhere.
On Hive.blog—a place once brimming with promise—a rot has taken root. Not in its code, but in its culture. A handful of self-anointed enforcers—@themarkymark, @Buildawhale, @Hurtlocker, and their legion of coordinated puppets—have turned the downvote into a weapon of mass discouragement. They strike not at “low-quality content,” but at independent thought, at rising voices, at anyone who dares thrive outside their narrow corridors of control.
And when confronted, they shrug.
“Oh, it’s not censorship,” they say, as if semantics could scrub the stain of suppression from their hands.
But let us be unequivocal:
When a system allows a few to systematically silence many—under the guise of “community standards” or “curation”—that is not moderation. That is censorship by another name.
It is the velvet glove over the iron fist.
It is exclusion dressed as discernment.
It is power pretending to be principle.
Meanwhile, Blurt stands clean-handed and open-hearted.
No downvotes.
No hidden juries.
No farms of phantom accounts casting ballots in the dark.
Just you.
Your words.
And a community that meets you not with suspicion, but with solidarity.
So let us carry this truth far and wide—not with bitterness, but with quiet certainty:
If you seek a place where your voice is not a target—but a gift—come to Blurt.
If you are tired of building on ground that shifts with every whim of a whale or warlord of votes—lay your bricks here.
If you believe the future of free expression must be free—not just from corporations, but from the petty tyrants who replace them—then stand with us.
The world needs to know.
Not because Blurt is perfect—but because it is principled.
Not because it is loud—but because it listens.
And in an age where so many platforms echo with the clatter of control,
Blurt offers something radical:
Silence for the bullies.
Space for the rest of us.
Keep speaking.
Keep sharing.
Keep building.
Freedom doesn’t advertise itself—
it is passed, person to person, like a torch in the night.
And tonight, the torch burns bright on Blurt.
@themarkymark, @buildawhale, @usainvote, and associated accounts:
Repeated downvotes targeting transparency efforts raise urgent questions about Hive’s governance. Automated tactics, coordinated curation trails, and alt-account farming undermine trust in the platform. When truth is silenced without dialogue, it erodes Hive’s decentralized ethos.
Key Concerns:
Systemic Manipulation:
Community Exodus:
Governance Crisis:
Solutions Needed:
The Bilpcoin team advocates for open dialogue, not division. Hive’s future depends on collaboration—not coercion. Let’s rebuild a platform where truth isn’t buried but debated, strengthened, and celebrated.
Transparency isn’t optional—it’s the foundation of trust.
#HiveTransparency #BilpcoinExposed #DecentralizePower"
A Message to @themarkymark, @buildawhale, and Associates
Every downvote cast in shadow, every silence imposed without dialogue, is not a victory—it is a confession. A confession that truth cannot be stifled, only delayed. With each punitive click, you dig deeper into the bedrock of credibility, crafting a chasm between your actions and the community’s trust.
@themarkymark, @buildawhale & Co,
How can you continue to downvote the truth, LOL? It’s almost comical how blatantly you attempt to suppress what cannot be hidden. The blockchain records everything—every action, every transaction, every move you make. Yet still, you persist in this futile game of trying to silence what is undeniable.
@themarkymark, @buildawhale, and Co: While our opinions may differ, on-chain transparency reveals repeated patterns of concern. Coordinated downvotes without explanation, 'farming' schemes (e.g., #buildawhalefarm), and adversarial engagement harm Hive’s community-driven ethos.
Key Issues to Address:
A Path Forward:
The Bilpcoin team remains committed to exposing truth and advocating for solutions. Let’s work toward healing, not division.
Note: All claims are based on publicly verifiable blockchain data. Constructive dialogue is encouraged.
#HiveTransparency #CommunityFirst #BilpcoinSupport"
@themarkymark & Co, the choice is yours. Stop the bad downvotes. Turn off the BuildaWhale scam farm. Cease playing with people’s livelihoods. Let Hive thrive as it was meant to—as a beacon of hope, creativity, and collaboration.
Or step aside and let those who truly care take the reins.
Because the truth won’t disappear. No amount of lies can change it.
It’s over.
The Bilpcoin team brings these truths not out of malice but necessity. We have no need to fabricate lies or cloak our intentions CALL US WHAT YOU LIKE —for the facts speak loudly enough on their own. What we present here is not conjecture but reality, laid bare for anyone willing to see.
@themarkymark & Co we urge you once more: STOP. Stop hiding behind tactics that harm others. Stop clinging to practices that erode trust within the Hive community. Let the truth stand—not because we proclaim it, but because it exists independent of any one person’s approval or disdain.
TURN OFF THE BUILDAWHALE SCAM FARM
Key Issues That Demand Immediate Attention:
The problems are glaring, undeniable, and corrosive to the Hive ecosystem. They must be addressed without delay:
These practices harm not just individual users—they undermine the very foundation of Hive, eroding trust and poisoning the community. Such actions are unethical and outright destructive.
@buildawhale Wallet:
@usainvote Wallet:
@buildawhale/wallet | @usainvote/wallet
@ipromote Wallet:
Author Rewards: 2,181.16
Curation Rewards: 4,015.61
Staked HIVE (HP): 0.00
Rewards/Stake Co-efficient (KE): NaN
HIVE: 25,203.749
Staked HIVE (HP): 0.000
Delegated HIVE: 0.000
Estimated Account Value: $6,946.68
Recent Activity:
@leovoter Wallet:
Author Rewards: 194.75
Curation Rewards: 193.88
Staked HIVE (HP): 0.00
Rewards/Stake Co-efficient (KE): 388,632.00 (Suspiciously High)
HIVE: 0.000
Staked HIVE (HP): 0.001
Total: 16.551
Delegated HIVE: +16.550
Recent Activity:
@abide Wallet:
Recent Activity:
@proposalalert Wallet:
Recent Activity:
@stemgeeks Wallet:
Recent Activity:
@theycallmemarky Wallet:
Recent Activity:
@apeminingclub Wallet:
Recent Activity:
Scheduled unstake (power down): ~2.351 HIVE (in 4 days, remaining 7 weeks)
Total Staked HIVE: 1,292.019
Delegated HIVE: +1,261.508
Withdraw vesting from @apeminingclub to @blockheadgames 2.348 HIVE (10 days ago)
Claim rewards: 0.290 HP (10 days ago)
Sent to bdhivesteem-40,000.000 HIVE
6 hours ago
101417581
Sent to bdhivesteem-20,000.000 HIVE
6 hours ago
103874728
https://peakd.com/@hurtlocker/wallet
Congratulations @wiseagent! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 55500 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts:
I've read something about a meme or a fact idk which one for sure. But the astronauts said something about 2x instances of outlook and neither were working. Have you heard about it?