Are we for AI or natural: A contentious world?
The beginning and starting piont of indecisiveness in the world.
AI generated content a widely accepted way to make it easier and human struggle for originality of all things.
The world moving is fast, much faster than we expected and many people we are also getting so acquainted to the speed at which everything is turning out. We in the same hand, consider that our life to needs, to look better, but in all we need something to improve it.
Which calls for the question of perfection, as our integral part. In our world today, everyone is attempting to get everything right, we hardly want to make a room to imperfections, by so doing we need to cover up all the loopholes.
This perfection would cut across all phases of our life, making it look more like digital divergence, which our next generation would be made to know how and the way it operates now.
I noticed something, that 70% of the people in the world, including organizations, call it whatever organization, does not give room for makes anymore.
We target to being extra perfectionist in anything we want to do, by so doing we allow everything into the hands, of our new phase of life called, digital and Artificial Intelligence.
Artificial Intelligence, is one of the best things, people would consider, if not that they have consolidated that, it is the best thing that have happened to them in the time like this. I would like to look into this.
Are we for Ai or natural
Everyone has legalized the issue of AI, and consider a very number of responsibilities on its part, with the phenomenon of what one consider as the new normal life. Which to extend has got nothing to do with some certain things we should give our preference to.
For legalization means, one having the right to do something, freely without any barrier to that context
That is to say, that AI has a legal background to some certain extent in our daily life, and activities, insofar, new digitalization is of concern.
Many people today used AI to get their work done, and these workers allows says it allows for easy and flexibility. Making it looks so perfect and astonish. Some even high jack People's work and rebrand it as if it is theirs'.
This post is to consolidate on articles, preposition. Does it mean that we are being real; as in realest?
If we think perfection is AI, don't we think we should allow it to apply to everything. Now if a teacher gives a student a class work, or a student choice to get AI-generated content to summit for the teachers, why should such work be subjected to imperfections and human attributes investigation?
Owning to the fact that we have a one tip finger that could do all of it . We carry the AI of a thing on our shoulders, which many time we still cry for originality.
Our we not being double standard; does these show that the world knows what they really want?
Why do we need to say that AI-generated content is not perfect, whereas, will do virtually everything now with it? Our we not deceiving ourselves, or perceiving another life that is not truly a reflection of what we want, or does it mean that we don't know what we want?
It gets to a point where humans are not asking you to make mistakes, things we should do and bring to the ambiance of its true beauty…. It is left in the lofty hands of an Artificial Generated content.
I feel we really don't yet know what we want, if AI contents, articles and all of it, is what we want, I don't see the need why we should reject AI-generated content.
But in the case, where we do not consider it original; as what we want, and regenerate people's Ideas to suite what we want. I think we need to take a deep breath, and ask ourselves again, what could possibly be the reality of our life.
Because if we say, this kind be used to get our way perfect then we should not retouch it, let it be acceptable the way we give it out. I feel AI to some certain extent is making people live a double standard lifestyle.
Every day, we have reasons to create fake lifestyle, ingenuity, our intuition is fading off the track. No matter how we pretend about it, it is now true that people don't live their lives anymore.
All of these, is because we want so much perfection, everyone want to see the next person present a perfect document about themselves. In the office, in the church and all figures, but none of us is accepting this perfectionist life. Let's ask ourselves, to manipulate what we have to legalize to be perfect by whom, and how, does it sound enough?
I think the way we perceived the use of AI opposed to our true life, and the way we jumped on the new Media is to judge our indecisiveness and even make things become more contradictory.
The question is: Would our organization legalize and allow AI contents from staffs- or do they want a natural contents instead of fake lives?
I don't see any need I should summit a project, content, and proposal generated from what everyone conceive to be the perfect. And the same people are asking me to make it human.
What do we really want form ourselves?
Even in our business today, AI generate contents supports it, politically, academically and otherwise. Even in the college, University, and our schools we are now thought about AI, and everything we heard about it sounds admirable yet all these organizations more specifically, our education sectors reject materials from the same thing they tell us is perfect.
Has this not eaten up the system, can we not just legalize this, yet we still give ourselves some form of pretence, by asking ourselves to give originality of what it already original to everyone?
*What really do we what?