US Gov (FDA) Tries to Delay Release Of Pfizer COVID19 Vaccine Data Until 2076! Scientists Are Suing Them To Expose The Truth.

The FDA has tried to sell the US population that the Pfizer COVID19 shots are 'safe and effective', so much so that they are forcing many to use them or to not be able to work and feed their families. This is clearly coercion and violates medical ethics. Key to their sales strategy has been to say that they will make all documentation on the authorisation of the Pfizer shots fully public! EXCEPT.. well, they aren't.. until 2076.

There are so many 'smoking guns' and 'nails in the coffin' for the experimental COVID19 shots that you might be forgiven for wondering why we are still here talking about them - but the answer to that lies somewhere between 'corruption', 'mind control' and 'epic denial'.

In this latest mind blowing smack from the iron first of reality, the FDA has pushed back against a group of top scientists from the most prestigious universities in the US as they have attempted to hold the government (rightly) to account and to uphold it's own promises. Instead of honouring the request for them to publish the data which they said that they would publish in full - the FDA has instead proposed that the documents are released drip by drop over the next 50+ years!

I am old enough to know that when governments set documents to be released in many decades time, it is only ever for one reason - namely, that if the documents were made fully public, there's a good chance that the public who are living under the effects of the issues involved would revolt and remove the government (or worse). Yet here we are, this is occurring right under our noses and yet few have even heard about it.

Aaron Siri Continues To Serve The People

US Vaccine Injury lawyer, Aaron Siri, highlighted in a recent article that the US government's 'transparency' that they championed regarding their policy of authorising and mandating the experimental COVID19 shots seems to have amounted to a terrifying and absurd joke. Aaron's testimony at the recent roundtable on COVID19 shot injury showed that he is both professional and focused on the task of protecting the rights of people in the face of an onslaught of pressure for them to be injected, losing body autonomy, in the name of public health.

The Court Document

The full court document is from the courts of Northern Texas and identifies that the group bringing the case, all highly accredited medical and scientific experts, are known as 'PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS FOR TRANSPARENCY'. They are recorded as being in litigation directly against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The gist of the case is that the FDA says it will take a long time to release the large number of documents involved. The Doctors say that it was exactly these documents that the government says it fully reviewed in only 108 days, before authorising the shots for public use. So the government is saying that it has the resources to review the documents fully in 108 days, but it will take over 50 years for them to get through making them all available for the rest of us! I'll be the first to admit that I don't have all the details of the situation, but I agree with the Doctors that this doesn't add up at all.

Key extracts from the document are below:

Plaintiff seeks the records submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19
vaccine (the “FOIA request”)4 and requests an order requiring the FDA to produce all documents responsive to its FOIA request no later than March 3, 2022. This 108-day period is the same amount of time it took the FDA to review the responsive documents for the far more intricate task of licensing Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine (the “Pfizer vaccine”). Plaintiff is an organization comprised of over 30 accomplished academics, professors, and scientists from the medical schools and related departments of our most prestigious universities, including Yale, Harvard, UCLA, and Brown. These academics and scientists represent a cross section of every discipline relevant to the licensure of the Pfizer vaccine and include many of the best our country has to offer when it comes to reviewing and assessing the appropriateness and validity of the FDA’s decision-making in licensing this product.

The ability of a majority of Americans to participate in civil society, and even exercise basic liberty rights, are now contingent on receiving this product. For example, the White House’s recent Covid-19 Action Plan and executive orders6 have made receipt of this product a condition of employment for more than 6 million federal workers and contractors, 22 million healthcare professionals, 84 million private sector employees, and the enlisted and reserve members of our armed forces. There are few whose livelihood, education, service, and participation in civil society are not contingent on a government requirement to receive this product. On this basis alone, basic liberty and government transparency demand that the documents and data submitted by Pfizer to
license this product be made available to Plaintiff and the public forthwith, precisely as contemplated by federal regulations.

The acute need for transparency regarding this product is heightened by the fact that the
secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), the FDA’s parent department, has granted
Pfizer complete immunity from financial liability for any injury caused by its product. If injured -- including suffering one of the injuries even federal health authorities admit occur from Pfizer’s product -- the injured individual effectively has no recourse. Pursuant to the declaration from the secretary of HHS, Pfizer cannot be sued by anyone receiving this product for any injury. Pfizer also cannot be sued for willful misconduct regarding this product unless HHS, which has been promoting this product, agrees to bring such a claim. It should not be that the public is deprived accessing the documents and data submitted by Pfizer to license this product when at the same time the public are being mandated to receive this product with no ability to sue Pfizer for compensation if they suffer any adverse reaction.

The FDA has proposed to produce 500 pages per month which, based on its calculated number of pages, would mean it would complete its production in nearly 55 years – the year 2076. Until the entire body of documents provided by Pfizer to the FDA are made available, an appropriate analysis by the independent scientists that are members of Plaintiff is not possible. Would the FDA agree to review and license this product without all the documents? Of course not. These independent, world-renowned scientists should be provided the same forthwith.

The entire purpose of the FOIA is to assure government transparency. It is difficult to imagine a greater need for transparency than immediate disclosure of the documents relied upon by the FDA to license a product that is now being mandated to over 100 million Americans under penalty of losing their careers, their income, their military service status, and far worse.

It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure on May 7, 2021, to when the product was licensed on August 23, 2021. We assume, as the FDA has stated, that it conducted an intense, robust, thorough and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. The FDA now has an equally important task of making those documents available to the Plaintiff in this case and the public at large in at least the same timeframe.

The FDA’s own regulations envision and reflect upon the importance of making this information public as soon as a vaccine is licensed. Its regulations provide that it is to make “immediately available” all documents underlying licensure of a vaccine. The FDA knew the intense public interest in that data and information. It should have been preparing to release it simultaneously with the licensure. Instead, it has done the opposite. Despite the passage of 84 days since licensure and 192 days since Pfizer started producing the records for licensure, the FDA has not released a single document submitted by Pfizer for the licensure of its Covid-19 vaccine. Not one page.

Mandates of this liability-free product are ongoing and expanding as we debate in this Joint Report. School-age children are now being mandated to take this product.16 Even 108 days from today to produce is far too long, hence Plaintiff respectfully urges that March 3, 2022 be set as the absolute outside date by which the FDA be compelled to produce these documents. The FDA is an organization comprised of more than 18,000 people with a budget of $6 billion. It has itself said that there is nothing more important than the licensure of this vaccine and being transparent about this vaccine. This request is precisely why the need for transparency is so critical and why Congress enacted FOIA. If the FDA claims its obligations under FOIA are too burdensome, it should take its complaints to Congress – not this Court.

Summation

Anyone who has studied the history of government corruption and collusion with money interests, knows that massive criminality is par for the course. We cannot get away with screaming 'follow the science' or 'trust the government' when they are repeatedly and so obviously avoiding following proper protocol and are being so dishonest in so many ways.

The argument that they cannot tell you what went into justifying their approval of the use of the shots because there's too much private information in the documents that might be of value to the government or to Pfizer is a position that they can and have taken - however, it should only ever be taken as a reason to reject the use of the shots and of their own policies. If someone is trying to force something onto you that could kill you, under the threat that if you don't do it, you might starve to death and go bankrupt - they had better have some exceptionally good data and evidence to back it up! People often now know that the shots are not as effective (or safe) as governments have repeatedly claimed - so they are wise to deeply question the intent of not releasing the very information that it is claimed the public should most want to see.

If the government wants massive shot uptake to continue, the best thing they can do is to share the wonderful paperwork that so convinced them. Surely the rest of the people will rejoice at the amazing science and evidence involved and rush to get their perpetual booster shots too? Or maybe they will discover that the majority of the paper involved had dead presidents on it, rather than insights from a living one!

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

Read My User Guide for Hive Here