Die Within 14 Days of Your Covid19 Shot? Then You Were Unvaccinated & Died of COVID... So.. It's a 'Pandemic of the Unvaccinated'.. Yes..

avatar

Are statistics being abused in order to cover up injuries/deaths from COVID19 shots and to inflate numbers of cases/deaths from COVID19 itself?

People who have received COVID19 shots and who get sick or die within 14 days of having the shots are being logged as 'unvaccinated' when they visit hospitals. This is according to several voices I have encountered online, including this series of tweets that I found today from someone alleging to be married to a nurse.

He states, as others have, that this means that not only are vaccine injuries being buried but additional cases of COVID19 are even being created since many are falsely logged as being COVID patients automatically.

My investigation of the US VAERS adverse reactions database recently showed that the vast majority of people who get sick or die following COVID19 shots do so within 2-3 days - which has been confirmed by the experiences of numerous frontline medical staff.

image.png


source: Medalerts / VAERS

If we look at the CDC page on vaccination status we see that, indeed, people are not considered vaccinated until after 14 days of their last shot. So it makes sense that hospitals would categorise people as unvaccinated even after they have received 2 shots, before 14 days is up.

Defining people as unvaccinated in these situations is a lie - they ARE vaccinated, they may simply not have sufficient response from the process to be considered to have generated whatever protection they will get out of it.

Is it not likely then that when we hear the phrase 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' - we may actually be hearing a lie. This lie may be due to many reasons, but this issue of counting vaccinated people as unvaccinated when they are sick, could very well be a huge part of a very dangerous deception and denial.

As I have posted so many times already (such as in this post about Israel), the mortality associated with COVID19 very regularly shoots straight up in nations that rollout a series of shots, typically the day or 2 days later.

So if these shots are doing great harm, as the data shows that they are, then by logging patients as unvaccinated in these situations, we may grossly mischaracterising the data and the situation. Large numbers of people may be dying due to the shots and being classed as 'COVID deaths'. Indeed, this is exactly what seems most likely to me, given the weight of the evidence I have.

Admitting to this would be akin to admitting to the worst degree of malpractice, denial, criminality and possibly treason - so we can never expect anyone in the health'care' system or political system to speak up on this in large numbers. That being said, courageous people have indeed spoken to this, including many Doctors, Professors and other experts - see my list of articles on Hive for many of their testimonies.

Remain vigilant.



Wishing you well,
Ura Soul






Read My User Guide for Hive Here


You Can Vote For Me As A Hive Witness!

Click the big black button below:

ura soul witness vote for hive


View My Witness Application Here

View Some of My Witness Related Posts

Note: Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Hive Blockchain.

Without witnesses there is no Hive blockchain or DApps such as PeakD and 3Speak... You can really help Hive by making your witness votes count!

I am founder of an ethical Digital Marketing Agency called @crucialweb. We help our clients to grow and innovate online and offer discounts for decentralised projects. Get in touch if you'd like to work with us.

ureka.org
I run a Social network for healing, balancing and evolving too. Meet compassionate co-creators of reality, learn, share & make life better!

Posted via proofofbrain.io



0
0
0.000
15 comments
avatar

Be careful posting about this on Hive now, I had all of my posts zeroed for calling someone a karen, it quickly escalated to me being antivax was the issue.

0
0
0.000
avatar

There are authoritarian types around, for sure. Top Tip: A lot of what triggers people pushing their weight around is them feeling their survival fear is triggered in some way. By considering that, it is possible to express free will most of the time without hassle. Most of the time!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah calling them a karen is a very bad idea.

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is Terrible shocking and not good at all.

You think the government hot a hand in this?


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

So what are you saying, that there is some huge number of people dying within 14 days of being vaccinated but that aren't being reported to VAERS? Any evidence of that?

Even if some people are dying in that time period, the fact of the matter is that your body does not develop sufficient antibodies from the vaccine to protect you from COVID until around 14 days have passed. So it as if you are unvaccinated even if you have technically received both doses. There isn't really anything sinister in that fact. Vaccines do not take effect instantaneously, your body has to have time to produce the antibodies in response. To call people who haven't been vaccinated for 14 days "fully vaccinated" is perhaps even more misleading because it gives the false impression that you are already protected when in fact you really aren't.

However, I wouldn't necessarily expect the death rate among those vaccinated for less than 14 days to be much higher than those who haven't been vaccinated at all (I suppose it could be somewhat higher if you assume those vaccinated are weighted to the most vulnerable). It would definitely be concerning if that were true but I don't have any reason to believe that it is at the moment.

0
0
0.000
avatar

They have tended to ignore or brush off reports on VAERS. The Outerlight posted a video on here a couple days back where a local news station asked their viewers to post comments if they knew someone who was not vaccinated and died from covid. What they got was an overwhelming response that was just the opposite, thousands of comments from people who had been injured or lost someone right after being vaccinated. That was just one local news television program in some town USA, imagine if that was asked by local stations across the country. It's at the very end of the video.

https://hive.blog/hive-122315/@theouterlight/sexzrwao#@sunlit7/qzmdji

0
0
0.000
avatar

Who is brushing off reports on VAERS? VAERS numbers are publicly available. There are certain time requirements for different types of reactions (e.g. anaphylaxis would have to happen within 2 days of receiving the vaccine but myocarditis they consider claims up to weeks later) but anything negative happening within a couple days after vaccination would be accepted by VAERS. I hardly trust facebook comments as a source. I can say that hundreds of millions of people have been vaccinated including very many that I know and I have yet to personally hear of any unexpected negative reactions. I'll trust that over anonymous comments on the internet. Of course I realize to you, this is also an anonymous comment on the internet :).

You can also look at it this way too... In the last week in the U.S., 750,000 doses of the vaccine were given. Statistically speaking, about 128 of those people would die of other causes. So statistically speaking, with hundreds of millions of people getting two doses of a vaccine, there are going to be thousands that die coincidentally within a day or two of getting the vaccine. If you don't realize that and you hear something like the following statement: "So far, 2,000 people have died within 2 days of receiving the COVID vaccine" it is going to sound horrifying when it is really meaningless. Now many of those will be people who are already knowingly sick or die in some way obviously unrelated to vaccination but there will be some number of them where the death was unexpected and might make someone suspicious but still had nothing to do with vaccination. I'd have to work a whole lot harder to figure out a ballpark for that number though...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Not according to information shared by doctors at the FDA hearing to give boosters. The reason they were denied was because doctors showed up and told them that the vaccines were killing to many people, that for every person the vaccine saved two were dying from the vaccine.

https://www.realms.chat/t/8786935639

Yes you would be right the vaccines so far haven't harmed a great deal of people but what you fail to understand is this is a new product that is lacking in long term data studies. Many times when you read the infor regarding medications they will give warnings who shouldn't take the medication, that's because everyone is different and they will effect many differently, those effects are from long term study of the product before it's put on the market. When speaking in those terms several million people could safely take that product but there may be another million or two who can't. That's exactly what the FDA told the pharmaceutical companies last week, you need to provide more data, we'll let you give a booster to the most vulnerable but for otherwise healthy individuals you have to do more study to see if the benefits outweigh the risk. They know these vaccines run a risk for heart conditions so ask yourself why is it that we have to find out from another institute doing their homework that those who suffer those conditions and survive will probably die within a three to ten year period from the damage being done?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-study-shows-1-1000-develop-heart-inflammation-covid-vaccination-myocarditis-related-heart-conditions-increased-death-rate-within-5-years-risk-higher-dying-v/

They shouldn't be allowed to just keep giving out these vaccines without through investigation of those getting injured or dying. I've just seen way to much stuff from different countries that corresponds to what other countries are saying. The same should be being done here, when doctors, pathologist, and scientist bring forth concerns they should be heard, information shared and concerned addressed, not having their careers ruined for doing so.

As far as the FB post I know what you mean but if I go on my FB page and post something about the virus, vaccine, etc, it immediately gets censored and shut down. Now if I go on my local news blog on FB and comment about the virus, vaccine, etc., it doesn't get censored. That's because FB makes big bucks off news channels using their site for comments. Big difference why I could never make to to getting three thousand some comments on my own page but a local news stations can. If they censored news stations like that news stations would just take their business to place like Disqus to run their comment boards.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That study seems very odd to me. Patients in most cases were given some combination of vaccines Pfizer/Moderna being the most common combo. That's not how it's done in real life (at least not normally). Also, one of your links mentioned that the Moderna vaccine led to 3 times the rate of heart problems than the Pfizer vaccine. Mixing all the stats together as if there was one vaccine gives somewhat of a false impression. But knowing that certainly makes the Pfizer vaccine seem a lot safer.

I get the impression that gateway pundit article is very misleading as well. It talks about myocarditis increasing you risk of death by a lot within 5 years, however my understanding is that would be for a chronic condition. While the mRNA vaccines may have myocarditis as a possible side effect, it is an immune response and is usually temporary and self limiting. That isn't to say it can't be dangerous, it certainly can. But not in the long term way that article indicates. Most myocarditis cases triggered by the vaccine are mild and treatable or self resolving with no long term effects likely. While you might not be able to say definitively that the vaccine won't have long term effects, the likely long term effects of myocarditis specifically can be determined by severity. While there may be a 1/1000 (0.1%) chance of myocarditis, the chances of a severe case with potential long term side effects is much smaller than that.

As you indicate, Facebook will do whatever Facebook does because they do it for money. That doesn't really say anything about the veracity or accuracy of the comments though.

People want to proscribe some sinister motive for pushing the vaccines but it is really simple. Covid spreads much easier and faster than the flu, it also has symptoms that, on average, are somewhat worse than the average flu strain. Hospitals do not typically have lots of extra capacity in the best of times. It wouldn't be too difficult, if COVID were just left to run rampant, for hospitals to be overwhelmed. If this happens, even more people will die. The vaccine is supposed to slow the spread, reduce your chance for hospitalization and reduce your chance of death. It SEEMS to be doing that. As far as risk factors, well, if you are a young adult male, consider the J&J vaccine over Pfizer or Moderna. If you are a female of child bearing age consider Pfizer or Moderna over J&J. If you are not in one of those groups, flip a coin. The point is, the risks are pretty well known and publicized. You even have to sign something that says you have read what they are before getting the vaccine. It's easy to make a choice that limits your exposure to risk even further.

I keep hearing conflicting stories about how in some places, most hospitalized people are vaccinated and in others they are not. I'm not sure of the reason for that. I can say that here in Florida, most hospitalized people have been unvaccinated...by a very large margin (95+%). Most of the stories that show the opposite seem to be coming out of Israel but i'm not sure of the origin. News articles that I have read out of Israel indicate that the Pfizer vaccine is only ~40% effective against the Delta variant but still highly effective vs. hospitalization and death. I suppose that it also may be true that there is a genetic component where the vaccine works better in some groups than in others.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think whether there is a sinister motive behind the vaccines will come out when they finally figure out one hundred percent for sure where the virus originated and how it came to cross the animal to human barrier but I have to admit recent release of a proposal for funding to spray bats in a bat cave that was denied falls within the guidelines of how we are seeing this virus unfold. Though they were denied funding it didn't mean they didn't move forward with their project. That's a whole different byline then speaking of moving forward with a vaccine that was rushed onto the masses.

Yes any medication can effect a different subset of individuals differently. (Asian, African Americans, Arabs, etc.,) just based on genetics. It may be rare but it's been known to happen, rare because they'd only use it if they couldn't modify it for use for the populace as a whole but had significant benefit to others.

I have to disagree on the heart inflammation because I have not seen one doctor step forward to say that any inflammation of the heart in regards to being minor doesn't leave some form of heart damage behind. Whether minor, major or in between that damage is for life. I would think that is why there's a shorter to longer time frame given in speaking of people who will ultimately die as a result of the damage, obviously it would seem minor heart damage recipients will not die within the same time frame as those who suffered more severe complications.

I found this news article to be quite alarming that out today:

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), since July 2 there have been 9,619 excess deaths in England and Wales, of which 48 per cent (4,635) were not caused by Covid-19.

So if all these extra people are not dying from coronavirus, what is killing them?

Data from Public Health England (PHE) shows that during that period there were 2,103 extra death registrations with ischemic heart disease, 1,552 with heart failure, as well as an extra 760 deaths with cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and aneurysm and 3,915 with other circulatory diseases.

Acute and chronic respiratory infections were also up with 3,416 more mentions on death certificates than expected since the start of July, while there have been 1,234 extra urinary system disease deaths, 324 with cirrhosis and liver disease and 1,905 with diabetes. (a href = "https://www.yahoo.com/news/analysis-thousands-more-usual-dying-170117640.html">

They are attributing it to people not seeking care during the pandemic last year or having care delayed because of the pandemic. I find it rather puzzling that they haven't seen this onset of extra deaths until July 2 of this year, I mean if deaths were trending upwards from those not seeking care call me suspicious if you like but I hardly doubt you could calculate a specific timeframe whereas all these individuals just suddenly started collapsing into the thrones of death, you'd think you see them saying there's been a gradual increase in these deaths and are now rising at alarming rates. In other words you'd think you see this as a slowly rising phenomena due to limited hospital resources. What else I find interesting is that people are dying from what doctors are seeing in vaccinated individuals, heart and organ failure. The ischemic heart conditions myocardial infarction falls within that realm. The fact they are seeing these increase after vaccination instead of pre vaccination is questionable in my opinion.

When you have doctors telling the FDA we are killing two people for every one person we are saving mainly just so we have open space in the hospital to save that person just doesn't add up to common sense. When these doctors are saying this in essence they are saying these people are dying as a direct result of the vaccines. There's a reason why on a lot of the television commercials you see, and a lot of comedians have used these commercials to make jokes out of, that say if you suffer from diabetes, have had heart problems, have sleep disorders, take MAOI's, have had urinary tract infections, are pregnant and nursing....etc., etc., etc, and that's just for one medication being advertised in the commercial should tell you all you need to know as to why one shoe will not fit everybody, that is why we will see millions of deaths if this isn't stop. Those deaths will continue for years afterwards because not just with the heart disease issue but many people have autoimmune disorders/diseases that they have no idea they have, they will come to fruition later in these people's lives and chances are better than not the vaccines can accelerate these processes. This would also be true of young children, these things should be concerning. There are many people out there who are under the impression that people who do succumb to the vaccine are doing so for the good of humanity as a whole. I beg to differ on that, no one should be able to offer themselves up as a sacrificial lamb for the betterment or wellbeing of others, exactly how would they feel if someone personally asked them to kill themselves because the world would be better off without them? If it takes two people dying to save one the trade off just isn't there.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I know someone who had to get a pace maker after getting her 2nd dose, then my wife's aunt passed away from Covid, and was vaccinated. Do you remember that one lady who posted about her nephew being hospitalized from the V, and then took it down because she did not want to be called anti v? I fell there is so much of this going on. The fear isn't from the Virus, it is from being labeled, and then shunned from their peers.

0
0
0.000
avatar

From the very beginning when this disease emerged, which later became a pandemic, we suspected that after this virus would come a series of 'savior' vaccines for humanity, mysteriously developed a year later. On the other hand, the big pharmaceutical companies will never share the methods used and the components contained in these vaccines beyond the fact that they somehow keep in their small vials some doses of the virus.

Having said that, I feel that we are in some sort of eugenic experiment where the reduction of the most sensitive population of us humans (poor, genetically ill, disabled) is made possible in the purest Hitler Nazi style. I think the elites are behind this because they consider us as cannon fodder for their experiments and therefore to maintain their way of life, meanwhile they use their media to ponder on the efficacy of vaccines of which there are more doubts about their protective capacity than certainties. I am not anti-vaccine, I understand perfectly well what this type of medicine has generated for humanity, however I am totally skeptical about the true intentions and the supposed good intentions of those who force us to innoculate ourselves with chemicals that we do not know in order to supposedly save our lives. The doubt is reasonable considering our past experiences.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

And then there's this whistleblower, exposing the whole thing.

0
0
0.000