RE: Weaponization of Propaganda in Scientific Journals
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
You can look up the RKI-Files, hopefully you will find a translation. It pretty much proves every Covid critic right.
I do think science in general is deeply corrupted, not by a single force, but by opportunists and midwits. Einstein already saw that the problems with the American science society back in his days.
This lady comes from university physics and is very critical pf science in our modern days. She says Climate Change is even worse than we think, but other than that she seems pretty bright.
0
0
0.000
Climate change is constant and beyond our ability to affect. The real scam of the 'climate change' propaganda is that we could do anything to stabilize climate. The most terrible aspect of the scam is that CO2 is the basis of terrestrial life. During the LGM (late glacial maximum) atmospheric CO2 dropped to ~190ppm, and had climate not warmed (releasing CO2 from the oceans) mass extinctions could well have become self-reinforcing and unstoppable until the Earth was sterilized, because below that level plants begin to starve to death for want of CO2, which is required for photosynthesis. Plants need CO2 like animals need O2. It's what they crave.
/rant
I am happy that many brighter and better minds than mine, like yours, are aware and staying abreast of the degradation of science and the potential consequences that may bring. Without scientific integrity, our understanding of the sciences cannot advance. Already the majority of published research papers cannot be replicated, lacking access to the original data, using undefined algorithms, inexplicable methods, many featuring evidence of academic fraud. This plague of fraud extends to the published works of Nobel prize winners.
I appreciate the reference, and will have at it as I am able. I'm presently learning about the Oera Linda Book.
Thanks!
From the discussions I remember having with you, I always considered you a bright mind aswell. Too many bright minds are too cowardly to speak the truths they see, especially in our current times. And while you might be even more contrairian than I am, I think controversial debates are vitally important. Circle Jerking with people you agree with might be nice, to make jokes about the whole situation and laugh, but why would I debate someone that already agrees with me?
I shall have to disappoint you here, and completely agree with you. =p
I know, that was the main reason I stopped debating you ;)
edit: the other reasons were personal stuff in my real life