1,900,000 STEM Miners burned out of 2M.

avatar

The max supply of STEM Miners was set to 2M initially as I was not sure what the final distribution would be. This number is obviously ridiculous and to show they will never be used or sold I am burning 1,900,000 STEM Miners.

While 100,000 is still too high unless the price moons, it is a much more reasonable supply that is now locked by contract.

The STEMGeeks team only has 1 Miner Staked which is the lowest of all tribes I have seen.

Many tribes the tribe owners are in the staked miner rich list. While I could buy miners which I could get at no real cost to me and stake them, I choose not to and only have the one initial miner used to jump-start the mining pool. STEM also has one of the lowest staked miners and prints 1/3rd to 1/2 the tokens of most tribes.

I have no plans on "purchasing" and staking any additional miners.

When planning the STEM token, I wanted a token that didn't have a high inflation rate and was not printing millions. Only around 840,000 STEM tokens are produced in a year. Over 4,000,000,000 of the 5B max supply have already been burned. I wanted something sustainable, not inflatable.

Stem has an 80% proof of brain pool and 20% mining pool.

This offers a larger mining pool than most tribes without drastically reducing the author reward pool.

Good authors on STEMGeeks are getting more tokens than most tribes even with far fewer tokens created.



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

Good authors on STEMGeeks are getting more tokens than most tribes even with far fewer tokens created.

This is great

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

( https://steemit.com/palnet/@bewarecenterbase/56f8bj-v-1-1-1-n-coin-chart-difficulty-ribbon-chart-evolution-of-coin-chart-from-stock-chart#@bewarecenterbase/pvvy67 )

funny.

This is NOT every day chart of coin price.

But talk about the EVOLUTION of COIN CHART from general STOCK CHART.
This is CORE TOPIC of STEM,
Science, Technology, Education and Mathematics,
and it can be a kind of philosophic topic.

If you let your robot automatically deny writings with chart pictures,
you are making mistake and you are declining Key Writings of STEM.

If you are human, you should read and understand the contents itself,
before you denounce others writings just glancing at the chart picture.

--

[코인蟲: 차트] 채굴어려움 띠 선도, 코인 차트의 진화, 주식 차트와 차별화 시작, v.1.1, 1/n [Coin: Chart] Difficulty Ribbon Chart, Evolution of Coin Chart from Stock Chart
( https://steemit.com/sct/@bewarecenterbase/1-n-coin-chart-difficulty-ribbon-chart-evolution-of-coin-chart-from-stock-chart )
( https://staging.busy.org/editor?draft=bewarecenterbase/1-n-coin-chart-difficulty-ribbon-chart-evolution-of-coin-chart-from-stock-chart )
2019.08.07. Wed,06:48, (utc+9), by @BewareCenterBase,

0
0
0.000
avatar

Funny again.

https://steemit.com/palnet/@bewarecenterbase/1-n-coin-invest-debt-interest-invest-profit#@bewarecenterbase/pvvyts

This writing is about the introductory definition of investment and savings
and will be definitely evolve to mathematical formulations
as the subject indicate.

you STEM is not public tag
but I guess a kind of closed self-voting tag expelling others writings.

You are abusing the name STEM.

Good Bye, Narrow minded.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

To Stupid Narrow Minded.

STEM , Science, Technology, Education, Mathematics
is not your own exclusive word
and you are not the one who decide which writings belong to STEM.

If you don't like others' STEM definition,
and you want to be the only exclusive one who defines the category,
make your own tag which are not public, like your own name or so,

instead of down-vote man-slaughtering with your own self-fucked justice standard or Content-Nazism.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Whoa, well done, I can understand how those numbers left some people... uncomfortable!

0
0
0.000
avatar

STEM is a good token. I'll spend more time to contribute to it.

0
0
0.000