Citizen Science Episode 4

avatar
(Edited)

In this new episode of Citizen Science on Hive @lemouth introduce us to "Deciphering top quark production at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider".

Titre.projet.jpg

All the steps including links to previous episodes can be found in his post:
https://stemgeeks.net/hive-196387/@lemouth/citizen-science-on-hive-deciphering-top-quark-production-at-cern-s-large-hadron-collider

For this new exercise i didn't encounter any problem, even if my "Virtualbox" asked for an update.


Task 1: the event content

We have here to import the previously simulated events in MadAnalysis after starting it:

Task1.1.jpg

And generate an histogram displaying the content of the reconstructed events in terms of high-level objects:

ma5>set main.lumi = 140
ma5>plot NAPID
ma5>submit

Task1.2.jpg

Here is the graphical result:

ma5>open

Task1.3.jpg

I have a red color because i made a little mistake while importing but it doesn't change anything in the results.


Task 2: Lepton and photon multiplicity

In the first step of this task we first create a graphical view of the Leptons (l)

ma5>define l = l+ l-
ma5>plot N(l) 5 0 5

And a second after cleaning objets with ‘transverse momentum’ smaller than 20 GeV:
ma5>select (l) PT > 20
ma5>plot N(l) 5 0 5
ma5>plot NAPID
ma5>resubmit

We get this result after:
ma5>open

Task2.1.jpg

In the second step of this task we do the same thing for Photons (a):

ma5>plot N(a) 5 0 5
ma5>select (a) PT > 20
ma5>plot N(a) 5 0 5
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

With this result:

Task2.2.jpg


Homework 1: Jet multiplicity

The homework consist in doing the same exercise for Jets (j) and B-Jets (b) with a different value for the cleaning: 25 GeV

So for Jets I entered in Mad5:

ma5>plot N(j) 5 0 5
ma5>select (j) PT > 25
ma5>plot N(j) 5 0 5
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

With this result:

Homework1.1.jpg

And for B-Jets I entered in Mad5:

ma5>plot N(b) 5 0 5
ma5>select (b) PT > 25
ma5>plot N(b) 5 0 5
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

With this result:

Homework1.2.jpg

For the question of the little variation, maybe we would have a greater with a greater value than 25.


Task 3: Selection of a subset of all simulated collisions

We will focus here on events containing exactly one lepton.
So we enter the command:

ma5>select N(l)==1

The result is as expected, about 30% of the events have one lepton in the final state.

Task3.jpg

Homework 2: Lepton multiplicity after the cut

We have now to study the effect of the above cut on the lepton multiplicity.

I entered the following code in Mad5:

ma5>plot N(l) 5 0 5
ma5>select N(l)==1
ma5>plot N(l) 5 0 5
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

And got the result:

Homework2.jpg

As we selected N (l) = 1 the result after the cut is in accordance, we have only the selected bar.


Task 4: Lepton properties

Here I had to update Ma5 because i had errors in the output so I entered:

ma5>exit
git pull
ma5>import /home/servelle/Téléchargements/madanalysis5/ANALYSIS_0/Output/SAF/_defaultset/lheEvents0_0/myevents.lhe.gz as ttbar
ma5>set ttbar.xsection = 505.491
ma5>set main.lumi = 140
ma5>plot NAPID
ma5>submit
ma5>open
ma5>define l = l+ l-

I'm not sure if the last lines were necessary but in doubt.

Now my graphical bars will be in blue.

In this task we create two histograms to study the transverse momentum (PT) and the absolute value of the pseudo-rapidity (ABSETA) of the Lepton (l) by entering the commands:

ma5>plot PT(l) 25 0 200 [logY]
ma5>plot ABSETA(l) 25 0 2.5 [logY]
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

With the result:

Task4.1.jpg

In the next task we investigate the mass (M) of the two most energetic Jets in the event's final state with the command:

ma5>plot M(j[1] j[2]) 50 0 250 [logY]
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

We get this result:

Task4.2.jpg

And we have the peak at about 80 GeV as expected.


Homework 3: Missing transverse energy spectrum

For this last task we have to find a way to get the best plot for the missing transverse energy distribution.

I am a bit lost but intuitively I wanted to try the following commands:

ma5>plot PT(j[1] j[2]) 25 0 250 [logY]
ma5>resubmit
ma5>open

With this graphical result:

Homework3.jpg

That doesn't get me any further in the question but I wanted to try.


This is the end of the Citizen Science Episode 3 for me.

Posted with STEMGeeks



0
0
0.000
13 comments
avatar

5 years this has been happening to me, it started here, around people that are still here. Homeland security has done nothing at all, they are not here to protect us. Dont we pay them to stop shit like this? The NSA, CIA, FBI, Police and our Government has done nothing. Just like they did with the Havana Syndrome, nothing. Patriot Act my ass. The American government is completely incompetent. The NSA should be taken over by the military and contained Immediately for investigation. I bet we can get to the sources of V2K and RNM then. https://peakd.com/gangstalking/@acousticpulses/electronic-terrorism-and-gaslighting--if-you-downvote-this-post-you-are-part-of-the-problem

0
0
0.000
avatar

5 years this has been happening to me, it started here, around people that are still here. Homeland security has done nothing at all, they are not here to protect us. Dont we pay them to stop shit like this? The NSA, CIA, FBI, Police and our Government has done nothing. Just like they did with the Havana Syndrome, nothing. Patriot Act my ass. The American government is completely incompetent. The NSA should be taken over by the military and contained Immediately for investigation. I bet we can get to the sources of V2K and RNM then. https://peakd.com/gangstalking/@acousticpulses/electronic-terrorism-and-gaslighting--if-you-downvote-this-post-you-are-part-of-the-problem

0
0
0.000
avatar

!1UP Trial and error is the perfect definition of science. Thanks for sharing!

0
0
0.000
avatar
Don-1UP-Cheers-Cartel-250px.png

You have received a 1UP from @underlock!

The following @oneup-cartel family members will soon upvote your post:
@stem-curator, @vyb-curator, @pob-curator, @neoxag-curator
And they will bring !PIZZA 🍕

Learn more about our delegation service to earn daily rewards. Join the family on Discord.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).

You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support. 
 

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for this report. You were the fastest! Please find below a few comments and some suggestions. Feel free to come back to me in a second stage.

I have a red color because i made a little mistake while importing but it doesn't change anything in the results.

Actually, the red colour is very nicely looking (and better than the blue).

The homework consist in doing the same exercise for Jets (j) and B-Jets (b) with a different value for the cleaning: 25 GeV

Whereas what you did was correct, do you think that a histogram with 5 bins is appropriate for the jet multiplicity distribution? The answer can be found on the webpage generated by the code.

For the question of the little variation, maybe we would have a greater with a greater value than 25.

Indeed! Have you tried out to see? There is a physics reason here, related to the origins of the b-jets. I won’t give the answer now, but don’t worry it will come later. For now, I only give clues ;)

As we selected N (l) = 1 the result after the cut is in accordance, we have only the selected bar.

That’s correct! This proves that the code does what it is supposed to do (without much of a surprise).

Here I had to update Ma5 because i had errors in the output so I entered:
[…]
I'm not sure if the last lines were necessary but in doubt.

In fact, the definition of the l symbol is necessary, as you use it afterwards. However, there is no need to re-plot the NAPID distribution, which you already studied. In any case, this does not hurt, so it is fine. You are just burning some extra CPU power ;)

ma5>plot PT(j[1] j[2]) 25 0 250 [logY]

Here, you plot in fact the distribution in the transverse momentum of the system made of the two hardest jets. By doing so, you assume that these two objects arise from the decay of a more massive guy, and then you plot the distribution in transverse momentum of this massive mother particle.

Whereas this may be something useful (as the two light jets often originate from a W boson), this does not answer the question. I will let you think further on this one before providing clues ;)

Cheers, and thanks again for your participation!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Merci pour ce retour,
je pense que je reprendrai du début avec cet éclairage dans quelques jours quand j'aurai l'esprit plus disponible.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Pas de soucis ! Prends ton temps. Je compte sortir l'episode 5 dans une dizaine de jours (et les solutions en fin de semaine prochaine).

0
0
0.000