RE: Darker Sides of Green
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Fringe science...not pseudoscience? Apologies for thinking out loud as I've had a couple of distractions working from home this morning.
When you write fringe science are you speaking about something that isn't popular and highly speculative? If so, then yeah I would agree with your statement. I try not to get overly excited about a thing when it appears I would have to wait long periods of time to learn about its progress or implementation.
There were articles I read, for instance, that hinted at the possibility of raising radioactive decay rates. I found that to be incredibly fascinating, but I could barely find any other information regarding the observations. It never ceases to amaze me about the resistance some areas can receive.
A couple of years later, following the original research, I found experiments that refuted such findings. I guess I got disenchanted because it meant more resistance to the concept. Because I felt it would just add years to the concept I move along to something else.
Correct.
Since the electric/plasma universe people are still looked down upon by main stream scientist, anything they do is considered fringe.
Since the Safire Project has managed to do what they expected and repeat those results, they are not pseudoscience. But, because they were considered pseudoscience, they had a bit of difficulty in getting funding for their research. If the next steps they plan on taking with what their experiments have revealed come to fruition, then their backers will become very rich or targets of the energy giants.
For, I don't know how long, there have been many many experiments in finding Dark Matter. None have succeeded. All have been dis-proven by electric/plasma universe theories. Yet, only Dark Matter/Black Hole research grants still print out the money.