RE: The age of frequency healing is here, but are you willing to give it a try?

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Hello there!

Thank you for your measured words and important perspective.

I do apologise if I gave the impression that all doctors are in it for the money. That was not my intention. No doubt the majority, like yourself, are honest people who want the best for their patients. From my perspective the problem rests not with the doctors but the industry behind them which is very powerful and capable of influencing the medical education system to favour ideas which generate money. It is an unfortunate side-effect of capitalism but business and health are two things which should never be lumped together. Ethical boundaries will always end up getting blurred.

As a quick side note here, did you know that in China doctors are paid a small amount of money each month by all their healthy patients? The monthly payments are no longer required when the people get sick, so the money incentive is the other way around there. Doctors want their monthly payments so they do everything they can to keep their patients healthy. Even to the point where if for example the flu is going around, they will call up their healthy patients and advise them on precautions. I'm not saying this system is the solution but it does seem to make more sense than the one we are accustomed to.

What types of frequencies are being used?

It seems like different machines use different frequencies. Will do my best to include this information in the posts which follow.

Very interesting what you say about these machines stimulating blood flow. This is a possibility but I'm pretty sure enhanced blood flow doesn't cure stage 4 cancers, so either what you say isn't true or the multitude of stage 4 cancer testimonials I have read are fake.

Am not able to describe for you the root pathophysiological effect but it seems in some cases that the answer comes from quantum physics. Am curious to know why you think Einstein said what he said? "Future medicine will be the medicine of frequencies". Are you suggesting he was wrong? He made this statement from the perspective of a man who was just unlocking the door of quantum mechanics, famously describing quantum entanglement as "spooky action at a distance". Spooky indeed. Will go into this in more detail later in the series.

Thanks for the Hanlon's razor thought. Yes, I can see this logic. I am hardened however to this idea having seen too much which cannot be described as anything except cold calculated decisions designed to either kill us or make money. No doubt there is much stupidity but the entities which steer the general direction of the medical industry (the same people who bought modern science long ago) are not stupid. They know exactly what they are doing.

It is a big step I realise for someone to even acknowledge the existence of a secret elite who control all aspects of our reality, but that is my perspective. And, I do believe, the perspective of most of the people who follow my blog. But with that said it is great to have your voice in the mix!

I am excited to get these posts out.



0
0
0.000
2 comments
avatar

As a quick side note here, did you know that in China doctors are paid a small amount of money each month by all their healthy patients?

I actually did know this. I always thought that was cool.

Am not able to describe for you the root pathophysiological effect but it seems in some cases that the answer comes from quantum physics. Am curious to know why you think Einstein said what he said? "Future medicine will be the medicine of frequencies". Are you suggesting he was wrong?

In short, yes and no. It's no doubt that Einstein is a great mind. I do however know from being entrenched in the field that scientists are more often wrong than right. You only have to be right a few times in the field. To some degree, I agree with the statement. All matter deals with frequencies. It's the application and efficacy that I question. How are these frequencies applied? What's the effect on biology? That kind of thing.

Also, I don't want to portray myself as a physician, as I'm not one. I am however working very hard to become one. We'll see. Currently I work as a paramedic. I see people in the dynamic chaos of their element.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I like the way you think. And I feel sure if you keep looking, you will find answers to your questions here. The next device I am going to describe is very interesting. There are many articles about it here with lots of details you may find interesting.

Great that you are working as a paramedic! From my perspective this is a much more useful profession than physician. Unless of course that physician can expand beyond their training by doing hours and hours of research with an open mind.

I wish you all the best on your journey and hope you will find the time to check out some of the devices I have been describing this week.

0
0
0.000