Questioning the Supposed Deaths From Covid
Further to the UK’s the People’s Vaccine Enquiry’s ‘Stone Summit’ in Belfast, Dr Clare Craig has given her testimony. Dr Clare Craig is a British geophysicist and Chief Science Policy Officer at the Royal Society.
You can catch the full presentation here
Highlights:
- Breaking down supposed deaths from Covid
- Appalling outcome predictors – on which decisions to lockdown were based
- Medically assisted death or treatment not given
- Over diagnosis with false positives – especially if they had died
- Vaccines not generating mucosal immunity
- Mass disabling event – 2% now off sick
In Depth
When people are in fear they look for a saviour and that saviour was the vaccine.
Supposed Deaths
She asks the question – what could it have achieved? We can only answer this question by looking at Covid deaths.
There are four types of Covid deaths:
- Those already about to die imminently
- medically assisted deaths
- over diagnosed deaths
- and because of the virus.
Niall Ferguson went from saying two thirds of these 80 year olds getting Covid would put us into lockdown to that these two thirds were going to die that year anyway.
Do Not Resuscitate (DNRs) were given out in a blanket way based on age and learning difficulties [and without consultation with family]. At the time NHS hospitals would not accept anyone with a DNR.
ITU care was rationed, in Spring 2020 90% of people who died of Covid had never had ITU care.
People who had pneumonias were not being given antibiotics. Ventilators were over used to protect medical staff and later on protocol had to be changed.
Finally end of life medications were given in unprecedented amounts and we know these drugs reduce the respiratory drive causing extra deaths.
Then we had over diagnosed Covid deaths, due in main to sensitive testing leading to false positives.
Only by subtracting these deaths can we see the true count of Covid deaths. Even for them the vaccine couldn’t have prevented all death down to a lack of immune systems facing an airborne virus.
We also know that for the two week period between vaccinations there is a two week period in which the body is trying to fight a foreign protein that the vaccine has introduced. In particular by ignoring this period they created the illusion of a successful vaccine.
What should success have looked like?
It should have reduced the level of virus being produced on a population scale. However, we instead see the same waves and same levels of virus.
It should have reduced the amount of people who were hospitalised and died.
In 2021 there was a jump in ambulance calls. Coinciding with the roll out and is still higher than before.
Would there have been excess mortality, especially from cardiac problems. Including countries such as NZ and Australia who had different pandemic responses.
Finally, there has been a mass disabling event. Immune systems have been harmed for people who have had multiple dosages.
Not everyone has been harmed. However a significant number has been harmed. 2% who took the first dose did not come back for a second. 2% are now unable to work due to being long term sick.