Curating the Internet: Science and technology micro-summaries for October 12, 2019
The danger of over-interpreting a single scientific study; A NASA animation demonstrates the relative speeds of different planetary motions; Programming languages for blockchain; NASA's first all-female space walk rescheduled for Oct. 21; An obsessed fan reverse engineered a reflection in a Japanese pop idol's eyes in order to find and assault her
Straight from my RSS feed | Whatever gets my attention |
Links and micro-summaries from my 1000+ daily headlines. I filter them so you don't have to.
- Exoplanets, Life, and the Danger of a Single Study - This article calls to attention the practice of reporting science news based upon a single study by pointing to a recent study reporting that a planet, K2-18b, had been found that had water and orbits in its star's habitable zone. This "potentially habitable" planet was widely reported in the press, (including Curating the Internet: Science and technology micro-summaries for September 14, 2019), but astronomers quickly started to resist this claim. The authors of the study continue to describe the planet as "potentially habitable", but many other astronomers have now weighed in, saying that although the planet is technically in the so-called "habitable zone", the reality is that the planet's temperature and atmospheric pressure are both probably too high to support life as we know it. With some caveats dealing for things like pressure groups the author suggests that science journalists have a responsibility to challenge the things their told, seek out dissenting view points, and make sure to publish a balanced and nuanced perspective. The author also suggests that science journalists should be more skeptical when they sense that a study is being hyped - which is consistent with the bird study in Curating the Internet: Science and technology micro-summaries for October 1, 2019. This short excerpt summarizes the problem nicely: "But an information pipeline that runs uninterrupted from scientists to press officers to the news media puts us at risk of another kind of misinformation. A great science story counts for nothing if it gives readers a misleading impression or paints a cartoonish, one-dimensional picture of how science works. Such stories are their own brand of fake news. In writing them, we do neither the scientists, their press officers, nor our readers any favors."
- Earth is screaming through space at 1.3 million mph. A simple animation by a former NASA scientist shows what that looks like. - NASA has posted a video that demonstrates the relative differences in speed of the Earth's various movements through space. The types of motion include the Earth's rotation around its axis, it's revolution around the Sun, it's orbit through the Milky Way Galaxy, and the planet's motion in relationship to the cosmic microwave background. As Elon Musk posted on Twitter, the fact that we can't sense this motion here on the ground, "makes it clear that you can only sense acceleration, not velocity."
Here is the video:
In order to help make Steem the go to place for timely information on diverse topics, I invite you to discuss any of these links in the comments and/or your own response post.
Beneficiaries
- Burn Steem/SBD - @null - 5%
- Cited author(s) - @rt-international - 10%
- Fundraising for the Rustin Golden Knights Marching Band - @rgkmb-unofficial - 10%
- Posting and/or scheduling service (steempeak.com) - @steempeak - 5%
- Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) curation on Steem - @steemstem - 5%
- Steem/API services (anyx.io) - anyx - 5%
- Steem/RSS services (steemrss.com) - torrey.blog - 5%
About this series
Sharing a link does not imply endorsement or agreement, and I receive no incentives for sharing from any of the content creators.
Follow on steem: @remlaps-lite, @remlaps
If you are not on Steem yet, you can follow through RSS: remlaps-lite, remlaps.
Thanks to SteemRSS from philipkoon, doriitamar, and torrey.blog for the Steem RSS feeds!
0
0
0.000
Concerning the point 1: this is the reason why any single observation has to be independently cross-checked! To go back to my field, we have two general-purpose experiments at the LHC, ATLAS and CMS, for this very same reason :)
This post has been voted on by the SteemSTEM curation team and voting trail. It is elligible for support from @curie and @minnowbooster.
If you appreciate the work we are doing, then consider supporting our witness @stem.witness. Additional witness support to the curie witness would be appreciated as well.
For additional information please join us on the SteemSTEM discord and to get to know the rest of the community!
Thanks for having included @steemstem in the list of beneficiaries of this post. This granted you a stronger support from SteemSTEM. Note that using the steemstem.io app could have yielded an even more important support.