Curating the Internet: Science and technology digest for December 4, 2019

avatar
Authored by @remlaps

An argument to find out what happened with the world's first CRISPR babies; Commentary on the relationship between organizational dysfunction and technology safety; Workers uncover a century old message in a bottle; New black hole research is consistent with previous findings; and a Steem essay discussing the phrase, blockchain interoperability


Fresh and Informative Content Daily: Welcome to my little corner of the blockchain

Straight from my RSS feed
Whatever gets my attention

Links and micro-summaries from my 1000+ daily headlines. I filter them so you don't have to.


image.png

pixabay license: source.

  1. Opinion: We need to know what happened to CRISPR twins Lulu and Nana - The University of Pennsylvania's Kiran Musunuru argues that the facts around the world's first CRISPR babies, Lulu and Nana, need to be revealed to the general public. The article says that a year ago, He Jiankui announced that the twins had been born and were gene-edited for resistance to the HIV virus. The researcher, however, has made only one public appearance since then. In that appearance, Musunru says that He presented only superficial information, and claimed to have submitted a paper for publication. A year later, however, the alleged paper remains unpublished. Musunru says that he read a manuscript from He's public presentation, and observed a number of problems, including the fact that the twins may not be resistant to HIV, and could be susceptible to other illnesses such as cancer, because of a phenomenon called, mosaicism where some genes were edited one way, but others were edited differently, or not edited at all. Because He is under house arrest, and because of ethical and safety implications, Musunru doubts if the work will ever be published in a respectable scientific journal, so he says that it's up to the rest of the scientific community to figure out what happened and to take steps to ensure safety and ethical protections for potential subjects of future research.

  2. How Can Leadership Best 'Mind the Gap' in Large Organizations? - Harvard's James Heskett notes a recurring problem in business, when factions in an enterprise have contrasting goals, and it results in safety issues for consumers. Starting with the Boeing 737 Max, Heskett points out that the sales organization did a great job at selling the plane, but a whistle blower alleges that the agreed prices led management to put pressure on the engineering group to prioritize cost-cutting, and even to reject a safety device that was proposed by the engineers. Heskett also points out that this doesn't seem to be an isolated incident, because similar allegations have recently lodged against Volkswagen. Speculating that this problem may be endemic in large organizations, Heskett wonders whether Toyota's management principle, Jidoka - which is the principle that any employee can stop the production line out of safety concerns, could be applied at the corporate scale to mitigate this phenomenon.

  3. MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE - On July 3, 1907, workers who were constructing a wall at New Jersey's Montclair State University slipped a note into a bottle, and nestled it into a gap between bricks. 112 years later, other workers found the note. It said, "“This is to certify that this wall was built by two bricklayers from Newark, N.J., by the names of William Hanly and James Lennon, members of No. 3 of the B.M.I.U. of America.”" The bottle that contained the message was made for ale or porter, and manufactured by the Consolidated Bottling Co. According to census records, the workers who left the message were probably first generation Irish immigrants. The school plans to keep the note, the bottle, and other artifacts on exhibit, and also hopes to find descendants of Hanley and Lennon, presumably to inform them of the find. h/t archaeology.org

  4. Black Hole Singularities Are as Inescapable as Expected - Describing the "singularity" within a black hole as the place where general relativity breaks down, and a deeper quantum theory needs to be discovered, this article describes two papers by Harvard University’s Black Hole Initiative (BHI) exploring the mathematics to describe black holes in a quasi-realistic model of a black hole. It was already known that the black hole model had outer and inner horizons, boundaries from which matter and light cannot mistake, but the team wanted to learn if the model would exhibit a central singularity. If so, they also wanted to know if it was a spacelike singularity, where time seems to break down, or a timelike singularity, where space seems to break down. They found that the blackholes they examined did, in fact, contain central singularities, and that the singularity was spacelike, which is consistent with previous assumptions that matter and light cannot escape from the singularity. Team members on the Black Hole Initiative include Paul Chesler, Ramesh Narayan, and Erik Curiel.

  5. STEEM ADSactly Crypto: What Is Blockchain Interoperability? - In this post through the @adsactly account, @chekohler writes that the jargon in the blockchain world can be overwhelming, and discusses the term, blockchain interoperability. The post notes that this term is rising in prominence as the Ethereum istanbul upgrade approaches. At present, most blockchains exist in complete isolation from the others, but if the blockchains could all be aware of each other, that would lead to a new degree of increased decentralization. The post defines blockchain interoperability as, "having a language that all chains can understand which would result in the free exchange of information or value across all blockchain networks without the need for intermediaries". This would be valuable, it says, because it would enable the peer to peer exchange of information and value on a much wider scale, and it would also open the door for better decentralized exchange networks. (5% beneficiary settings have been applied to this post for @chekohler and @adsactly.)


In order to help bring Steem's content to a new audience, if you think this post was informative, please consider sharing it through your other social media accounts.


And to help make Steem the go to place for timely information on diverse topics, I invite you to discuss any of these links in the comments and/or your own response post.

Beneficiaries


About this series


Sharing a link does not imply endorsement or agreement, and I receive no incentives for sharing from any of the content creators.

Follow on steem: @remlaps-lite, @remlaps
If you are not on Steem yet, you can follow through RSS: remlaps-lite, remlaps.


Thanks to SteemRSS from philipkoon, doriitamar, and torrey.blog for the Steem RSS feeds!



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

Wow thank you so much for picking my post I really appreciate it

0
0
0.000
avatar

You're welcome, and thanks for the post. It seems like a good general technique for introducing people to blockchain jargon.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hello,

Your post has been manually curated by a @stem.curate curator.

FA8866FD-F2C3-43B3-A5A5-E0324BA4BB47.jpeg
Supporting Steemians on STEMGeeks

We are dedicated to supporting great content, like yours on the STEMGeeks tribe.

If you like what we are doing, please show your support as well by following our Steem Auto curation trail.

Please join us on discord.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Regarding the first item, I note the apparent lack of evidence of even the initial claim, and am dubious of the entire story. I also note that CRISPR is tabletop tech, and it is extremely likely that folks have used it without seeking the limelight, for obvious reasons. Also, given Penn State's history, I have no interest in that institution being the knight in shining armor protecting us from our enemies. Frankly, I am surprised that mobs with pitchforks and torches haven't burned it to the ground.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for the reply!

I have more on the CRISPR twins in tomorrow's post. Apparently, they coordinated the release of several different articles all at once, and I came across some others today. I think I left it out of my summary because of length, but you're not alone in being dubious. One of the issues that was raised in that reading is the question of whether the twins actually exist at all. Apparently, there has been no evidence other than the author's words - which might be to protect their privacy, but also could mean that it's all fabricated.

I get your point about Penn State, but this guy was from U. of Penn, not Penn State.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I look forward to the additional information you have found regarding the twins, and appreciate the correction regarding universities in Pennsylvania. I've never been there, and made what I am sure is a common mistake.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

You're right, that is a common source of confusion. I mixed the two schools up with each other frequently when I was growing up, and I'm relatively close to both.

Just to make sure you saw them, since my use of the word "tomorrow", right around midnight the other night may have been ambiguous, the other links to CRISPR articles are in item #2 of Curating the Internet: Science and technology digest for December 5, 2019

0
0
0.000