RE: The Creators of the Metaverse
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Ah yeah, The metaveeeeerse. The new buzzword on everyone mouth everywhere around the globe wherever you turn to look lately. :)
Either you pay money (invest) or pay in time and/or skills. If you have none, sorry…. Next! As there are a lot of people in the world with either money or time or skills.
But unlike what @azircon believes that with only money, time or skills, all this utopia will be achieved. Perhaps it would be convenient to warn him that that alone will not be enough to make all this a reality. In the metaverse there is no room for castes or discrimination of any kind. And the only option to carry it out and be successful with the project, it's going to be in teamwork with the participation of absolutely everyone. Regardless of the money, time and skills they might have.
Those ants in your picture holding the grape are wonderfully skillful :)
I agree mate. And I suspect that has only been possible because they have allowed to everyone in their surroundings be just as they are and that each one contribute and helps to achieve the common goal as well as they can within their possibilities and limitations without any restriction at all. :)
This guy is doing fine on his own:
It has been around a while and I think its popularity now is driven over the last 20 years of culture on the internet - it is just that once something hits the mainstream media, people will latch on more.
I don't think @azircon is saying anything about doing things alone in this regard, he is saying that people have to bring something to the table, not just turn up for free food. If a person brings nothing, does nothing, facilitates nothing etc - why are they needed?
Absolutely! That is exactly what I am saying. I don’t want an useless person on my team.
Yep, that's true. But in the way he put it, he seems to imply that only those with money, time or skills are the only ones worthy of having access to build this utopia. In my opinion, there are many other wide spread attributes that are also absolutely necessary in order to reach the goal.
Anyone who dares to describe another as useless in this world, must be suffering from some superiority complex or something like that. "In their team" ah, that's already a totally different beast with vices and ailments typical of the gods of the Olympus.
Yep, they seem to have developed a taste for grapes of any color.
Not really. To be useful, something is needed "skill" can mean many things.
I disagree on this too. As, there are people who are useless with little excuse as to why. At some point, people have to take responsibility for at least some part of their lives, rather than expecting to be carried.
Ummm - I don't want useless people in my team either, which is why we don't hire some people. They have to add value to the Team, otherwise they are a burden on the Team. As far as I know, @azircon leads a team of people (he took them for drinks the other night) so I suspect he is referencing his personal experience. He also supports several different Hive Teams, so I suspect he wants those people to provide value too.
I think you are reaching for something that isn't there.
In order for any “team” to succeed individuals must think about themselves AND the team.
In economics, it’s called Nash Equilibrium. It’s rather famous :)
That's exactly what I'm saying. There are a helluva different talents well beyond the scope of just money, time or the sort of "skills" that according to his way of expressing himself I catch which are those that he refers.
Yep, there are. But I would never dare to rate anyone of totally useless. Since many are already useful to at least fertilize the land with their offal.
I agree, everyone should be responsible for their actions. And I think that very few would feel comfortable being carried when they know that very few would be willing to do so as long as they still have a pair of legs, arms and hands commanded by a brain in more or less good condition.
Yeah! that's what we all do. We want to be only surrounded by those who share our exclusive and subjective concept of what being useful is.
Team, Caste, Lineage, Pedigree, Lodge, Brotherhood, Coterie, Clan, Tribe, Gang, Social Rank. Yeah, everyone has their own.
Of course, as long as that perceived value matches his in all those categories of groups that I mentioned above as cultivators of the same concept of what they consider useful.
I wouldn't be surprised. I tend to do it with some frequency. :)