PEvO roadmap: the next 18 months
It's been nearly two weeks since the launch of the PEvO beta, and it's time to lay out the current plans for its future trajectory. The core functionality is implemented, although it needs a lot more testing under real-world conditions. Content is written on-chain, but in a testing namespace - be aware of that when you use your Hive account. The platform provides free accounts to users with an institutional email address or an ORCID iD with at least 3 external publications. If you don't have either we can whitelist email addresses for testers.
When the whitepaper was written in 2016, the open science ecosystem was only just starting to sprout. Much has happened since, but the core ideas of the concept are still as valid today. The interest in post-publication reviews has even risen.
From here, the work splits into three phases:

Phase 1: Preparation for production. September 2026.
Step one is expanding the tester cohort to simulate real interactions by different users. This will surface bugs and issues that have to be fixed before we can move to a production namespace without the risk of putting incorrect data on chain. A security review of the code by independent professionals is an optional goal for this phase, dependent on cost and funding.
It also needs content policies, a code of conduct and similar moderation guidelines. Drafting these well requires input from people experienced in moderating scholarly platforms, which is one of the things we're currently looking for in advisors and contributors.
Phase 2: Standards and institutionalization. September 2027.
The current feature set is largely complete in regard to evaluation, but for the publishing part to be useful to researchers it requires a lot more integrations. Metadata has to be mapped to standard scholarly metadata formats including Dublin Core, JATS XML, COAR Notify, and others required for institutional and indexing integration. This work requires a more systematic approach than the quick development of the beta meant to demonstrate the concept.
To be able to issue DOI numbers and access some institutional APIs, PEvO also needs a legal umbrella. Work is underway to form a Portuguese non-profit association as an appropriate legal structure. Still looking for volunteer founding and board members.
Funding for this phase has been requested through an NLnet NGI Zero Commons application submitted for the June 2026 round.
Phase 3: Field establishment. October 2027 onward.
The focus will be on adoption: having a presence at conferences, contacting research groups and institutions, creating publications about PEvO's design and participating formally in standards bodies. Future sustainability becomes a real question, with European research infrastructure programs, foundation funding, and donations as likely targets. The reputation algorithm requires fine-tuning with real usage data, which only becomes meaningful at scale. Governance also matures at this point: an elected board, transparent reporting, community participation through voting.
If you want to help shape the future of the project, get in touch. Be aware that plans will evolve; this is a rough roadmap, not a fixed timeline.
Great project, I volunteer for testing and more!
Amazing! Are you familiar with Discord? Alternatively we could set up a Telegram group, or coordinate by email for now.
Sure, I use discord. See you there.
Congratulations @pevo.science! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 200 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 50 replies.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP👏 Congratulations to the PEvO team on this remarkable initiative!
We recognize how urgently the scholarly ecosystem needs transparent, decentralized, and community-driven tools for publication and evaluation. PEvO's vision—rooted in open science principles and built on resilient Web3 infrastructure—offers a timely and thoughtful response to long-standing challenges in peer review, credit attribution, and knowledge accessibility.
Great commitment to:
🔹 Post-publication review as a dynamic, living process—not a one-time gatekeeping event
🔹 On-chain transparency that preserves scholarly contributions without relying on centralized intermediaries
🔹 Inclusive access for researchers worldwide, regardless of institutional prestige or geographic location
The phased roadmap demonstrates both ambition and prudence: prioritizing rigorous testing, community governance, and alignment with scholarly standards (Dublin Core, JATS, COAR Notify) before scaling.
To fellow researchers, librarians, editors, and academic institutions: this is an invitation to shape the future of scholarly communication. Whether by joining the beta, contributing expertise in moderation or metadata standards, or simply engaging in the conversation—your participation matters.
Wishing the PEvO team continued progress, meaningful collaborations, and the support this initiative truly deserves. 🌱🔬
As a physician is involved in quality assurance, and evidence based medicine, I know the current process of peer review for journals which contain the research studies upon which all medical standards are based tis not perfect.
I think this is a fascinating potential replacement or supplemental source of scientific evidence.
It is good because science should be published and shared.
It is scary because the peer review process does filter out the false research, the research heavily influenced by third prties,like dairy or cattle association influence on studies on the health effects of meat and milk, or even the absurd influence of the tobacco association on research into the effects of cigarette smoking.
But all changes must be view carefully for new technology comes with new exploits and vulnerability.
But one never wants to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
My last 8 years spent in learning what bitcoin was, blockchain, digital ledgers and decentralized finance has been quite an intense education.
It makes me view new projects with great optimism, but a also a bit of health desire to understand the new technology strengths and weakness.
Bravo for doing something new and different, our society deserves new ideas and new technology to improve upon our old ways and create better ones.
Speaking of new things and innovation, I have written a Proposal for DHF. I would appreciate it if you woud look at it and provide feedback: #374 Link