Introduction to the Synthetic AC Model
This article was originally written by @beneficencetv as a Google Doc and he has given me permission to post it on the Hive blockchain.
Hypothesis written by Ben E. Factor (Alias)
Synthetic AC Model Part 1 — Summary for Review
1. Motivation / Problem Statement
Conventional AC theory treats bidirectional current reversal as sufficient to describe energy transfer and wave behavior. However, in several pulse-driven, asymmetrical, and Rodin-geometry systems, waveforms with similar RMS values behave differently under load, collapse differently, and produce non-intuitive charging effects. This suggests that time symmetry alone is not sufficient to characterize energy flow.
The model below attempts to distinguish true alternating fields from synthetically constructed bidirectional waveforms produced by switching, pulsing, or rectified recovery. These ideas are a direct result of my objective data and observations of non-linear systems using Rodin Coil geometry.
2. Definition: Synthetic AC vs True AC
True AC
- Field reversal is continuous and sinusoidal
- Forward energy oscillates symmetrically between electric and magnetic domains
- Forward and backward components are not separable
- Collapse is smooth and reciprocal
Synthetic AC
- Constructed from two or more unidirectional pulses, rather than polarity shifting.
- Apparent bidirectionality arises from time-domain sequencing, not field continuity
- Forward and backward components can be physically or temporally separated while still synergized
- Collapse is asymmetric and produces recoverable radiant or longitudinal effects
3. Forward / Backward Component Separation
In pulse systems such as our modified joule thief with a high speed diode on the positive output rail, The diode does not “block AC” but instead separates forward and backward energy components. While still connected via a field bridge. The diode only blocks current, not field interaction. This separates the two sending the 10+ volts to the load with no direct return path and -168volts to the battery negative terminal.
- One component performs conventional work
- The inverse component collapses into a high-dV/dt recovery event (often dismissed as loss or noise)
- This separation is observable on the oscilloscope as an Resonant Pulsed Waveform and 10+ volts with -168volts output. This implies energy is not merely reversing, but partitioning.
4. Observed Waveform Predicts Field Interaction
Experiments with our joule-thief setup have produced a waveform that supports the synthetic AC model and its predictions. Using a floating probe—which captures field interaction without being grounded (grounding filters out back-EMF effects)—we observe three distinct characteristics that appear system-wide, regardless of probe location, indicating either singularity or system-wide resonance.
(1) Nested Harmonics on the Normal Oscilloscope Scale
On the default scope settings, secondary and even tertiary nested harmonics are clearly visible. The waveform appears as a single wave “bouncing off itself” in a chaotic manner.
(2) Micro-Scale Zero-Point Convergence
Zooming in reveals a micro-scale structure that resembles a zero-point or energy convergence. This suggests direct field interaction at the local level, possibly where energy is temporarily focused or exchanged between counter rotating field components.
(3) Macro-Scale Emergent Sine Wave
On a macro scale, the previously chaotic nested harmonics converge into a smooth, beautiful sine wave. Changing the coil geometry disrupts this emergent pattern: for example, our pancake coil produced a distorted, bell-shaped wave that was close, but not a perfect sine wave. In this configuration, the zero-point region appears less energetic, with minimal sideband activity. In contrast, the ABHA coil(with a RPW) produces a strong zero-point with pronounced sideband activity, indicating massive energy interaction at either side of the zero point.
Changing the coil geometry changes the synergy/energy transfer effect
Figure above demonstrates the same Modified Joule Thief circuit but with a traditional Tesla style flat pancake coil. Notice how the smooth sine wave changes to a bell shaped curve. Indicating non-efficient energy transfer in comparison to the Rodin Coil.
These observations suggest that the waveform’s efficiency is strongly tied to field interaction and geometry. Two waveforms may appear similar in shape, but their energetic behavior differs dramatically. The bell-shaped waveform of the pancake coil is highly inefficient compared to the smooth sine wave of the ABHA coil, demonstrating that visual similarity does not guarantee similar performance.
The third characteristic, the apparent pinch point between counter-rotating fields, or the zero point is still open for interpretation, but it may represent the critical location where forward and inverse components interact or are partitioned.
The ABHA coil’s geometry not only stabilizes the emergent sine wave, but also maximizes energy extraction by leveraging field interactions that are absent or suppressed in simpler coil geometries.
Taxonomy
Field Cavitation Theory
In the Synthetic AC model, field cavitation is a direct consequence of coil geometry, not merely a byproduct of excitation method. If synthetic AC is the category, then field cavitation is the mechanism of action for the unique effects of both Rodin coil geometry and non-linear systems. The ABHA coil with the correct setup(two or more channels) structures the electromagnetic field into counter-rotating components that occupy the same spatial volume. With the correct phase timing, this geometry forces simultaneous field compression and rarefaction, producing cavitation effects analogous to bubble cavitation in fluid. Observations that may indicate successful field cavitation include, but not limited to, picking up a magnetic monopole in the center of the coil.
The ABHA winding effectively creates two electromagnetic channels from a single continuous conductor. These channels are phase-segregated by geometry rather than by circuitry, resulting in:
- Co-located counter-rotating magnetic fields
- A stabilized equatorial null / zero point region where transverse energy flow is minimized
- Persistent field density gradients that do not appear in conventional solenoids or toroids
This geometry-induced cavitation explains why ABHA/VBM coils respond so strongly to non-sinusoidal drive: the field is already structured to support separation. Synthetic AC and Tesla-style impulse excitation do not create the cavitation—they exploit and amplify what the geometry has already imposed.
Within this structured field environment, dipole preservation becomes naturally achievable. Extending Tom Bearden’s work, the model proposes that the ABHA geometry delays dipole collapse by preventing immediate recombination of field components and redirecting forward energy away from the battery’s positive terminal. Instead of forming and annihilating dipoles symmetrically each cycle (as in conventional AC), the geometry spatially segregates forward and inverse components to use for separate purposes. (Forward to power your load, backward is directed back to the battery for energy recovery)
These two asymmetric pulsed events are timed to create a field bridge, allowing separation using a single diode on the positive output rail. The forward flow is delivered to the load with minimal return to the battery, while the backward flow is directed to the negative battery terminal. One pathway acts as a dipole preservation mechanism, and the other as a dipole restoration mechanism.
In short, the system leverages two different types of waves for distinct purposes, using geometry and timing to control field interactions. The model proposes that electricity is fundamentally electricity, but its modality and energetic behavior are determined by origin and waveform structure. By separating forward and backward components at the output, we can harness each for its intended function, creating synergy via a controlled field bridge.
This creates a potential connection between:
- VBM / ABHA geometry (spatial field segregation)
- Tesla impulse technology (time-asymmetric excitation)
- Bearden’s dipole preservation (extended dipole life and field interaction)
- Bedini devices (capture of the collapse component as a distinct energetic event)
The critical implication is that energy behavior is geometry-dependent before it is circuit-dependent. Two systems driven identically can behave differently because one geometry enforces cavitation and dipole segregation while the other does not. The Bedini SSG is a type of Reactive Driven Synthesized AC, however it might not have the correct coil geometry to induce field cavitation(Or it might be doing just that). Further testing is needed to determine for sure if the Bedini SSG is producing the same effect as the Rodin coil. However, John himself did describe the system as a monopole. The exact effect you would theoretically get from the Rodin coil with field cavitation is a strong magnetic monopole. The Bedini SSG system has yet to be fully analyzed and applied under this current Synthetic AC model. However, whatever non-linear system we have applied the model to so far shows not only an uncanny internally consistent logic but that logical consistency appears to extend outside the model into standard electrical models.
Thus, synthetic AC is best understood not as a waveform trick, but as a matched excitation strategy for coils whose geometry already violates the assumptions of uniform, reciprocal field behavior. At its core, the model is a classification correction more than anything else.
6. Rodin / Vortex Geometry Relevance
- Using a single continuous conductor in Rodin geometry:
- Two effective current channels are created from one wire
- Counter-rotating electromagnetic fields occupy the same spatial volume
- Their interaction produces:
- Compression and rarefaction zones
- A null / equatorial plane (zero-flux or void region)
- Synthetic AC excitation enhances this separation compared to sinusoidal drive
This geometry appears to spatially externalize the forward/backward distinction.
Supporting Evidence:
🤯🧲 Did I build a Magnetic Mono-Pole? |Holy Grail Physics| BeneficenceTV #rodincoil #vbm #vortexmath
The Dual Thief Setup | BeneficenceTV
Wattman Reduction Test (Voltage increase under load on wall)
We achieved a 33-watt reduction of required input power from the wattman test. Even an extremely low impedance, high q factor system operating at 100% efficiency should not see this kind of energy savings. Something else is going on here. So we hooked the test up to a 12v battery. While the battery isn’t powerful enough to fully synchronize the sphere and keep it spinning at high speed, it is enough to keep it going for long enough to prove the concept. Since the 12v battery is low for the 18v stereo amp I have, the magnet will eventually de-syncronize or fall out of sync with the system. Meaning it's not going to be spinning fast enough to sync up with the system's frequency or a harmonic of that resonant frequency. But it syncs up just long enough for us to observe this…
Wattman Reduction battery increase. This is the “Holy Grail” of my energy research. Under no circumstance should this battery’s voltage go up while being used.
Test 1: Energy Recycling 101 | Ben's Guide to Free Energy
Test 2: Battery Reversal Under Load 1 (I believe we started at around 12.74 or 12.75v and then the magnet slowly increased this to 12.78v before it de-synchronized.
Test 3: Battery Reversal Under Load 2
*Better videos of the effect will be included at a later date when I record more footage. All these tests were done live on stream without an extra set of hands. When I find a lab partner who can hold my camera I can record new footage. We’ve gotten it to synchronize and climb in voltage for about 5 minutes on one test. However, it sometimes requires me to physically hold the container inside the coil to bring the magnet closer to the equatorial plane. The charge level/power of the battery is key to maintaining that spin and staying in sync. It is also my belief that a fully conditioned negatively charged battery(from a Bedini Motor) should be able to reabsorb that negative return energy more effectively than a traditional battery. We will be testing this idea in the lab as well. After recent testing I have also come to the conclusion that we might need a more even and precise coil design to fully synchronize this sphere with the system. This coil I’m working with might not be able to synchronize for more than a few min at a time due to asymmetrical imperfections in the coil that lead to a destabilizing spin.
7. Key Claim (Non-Speculative)
Two waveforms that look similar in RMS voltage, frequency, or duty cycle do not necessarily carry or release energy in the same way.
Energy behavior depends on:
- Temporal symmetry
- Collapse dynamics
- Phase coherence
- Field continuity vs sequencing
Synthetic AC exploits sequencing, not oscillation.
8. Open Mathematical Questions
The model is seeking formal grounding in:
- Can we experimentally verify some kind of interaction between forward and backward components regarding energy transfer?
- Can we explore the possibility that if these impulses are the main energy transfer mechanism, how to read them or if we can we even read them accurately with current measurement tools that average everything out?
- Can we use mathematics to verify or make sense of any of these theories?
Any mathematical framework clarifying energy partition vs energy reversal would be invaluable. True AC is the polarity reversal of one energy event. Synthetic AC is partitioning, timing and asymmetric regauging of two or more separate events that combine to form a single reversal between them.
9. Purpose of Review
This model is not presented as a final theory, but as:
- A classification correction
- A measurement correction
- A language correction around what is currently called “AC”
- Attempts to bridge the gap between VBM concepts and Electrical Engineering concepts to predict non-linear behavior and improve upon these systems.
- Integrates Tesla impulse technology, John Bedini’s pulse-motor principles, and Tom Bearden’s dipole preservation concepts via asymmetric regauging. The synthetic AC model combines these all into a unified, coherent framework.
The goal is to determine whether these observations fit within existing mathematics or require refinement of the model.
Posted Using INLEO