Evidence of Myocardial Injury in 2.8% of Moderna Booster Recipients
The above image was made with stable diffusion using the prompt 'a painting of a heart anatomy.'
Even though we were told that the covid vaccines and boosters were safe, a growing body of evidence has suggested that these claims were untrue. Now a study conducted by the University of Basel, Switzerland, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute of Basel (CRIB) sheds light on just how dangerous these shots really were. Here's a quote from an article about the study:
Evidence of myocarditis—a potentially fatal inflammation of the heart—was observed in 1 in 35 subjects who received the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster, with 1 in 20 showing indications of having suffered some kind of heart injury. Of the 777 subjects that participated in the study, all of whom were medical professionals (70% of whom were women) at the median age of 37 who received the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, 2.8% had elevated cardiac troponin proteins present in their bloodstream three days after receiving the shot, indicating damage to the heart muscle had indeed taken place. “mRNA-1273 booster vaccination-associated elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons (2.8%), a greater incidence than estimated in meta-analyses of hospitalized cases with myocarditis (estimated incidence 0.0035%) after the second vaccination,” the research scientists wrote.
This looks like the the most robust study on the subject I've seen so far. It wasn't a meta-analysis of many tiny studies. It didn't rely on surveys or indirect data. Testing was performed right after participants received the shot, using biological markers to determine results.
The findings appear credible. They're also shocking. 2.8% of those who received the Moderna booster showed symptoms of myocardial injury. Imagine a restaurant that made three percent of its patrons dangerously ill. Obviously no one would eat there.
I personally received the two shot dose of Moderna. I did it reluctantly, under duress from a relative who'd been misled by cable news. In that moment, I thought that the vaccine was useless, but basically inert. Over time, it's become clear that the vaccines were far from inert. They were actually very dangerous.
Pharma obviously knew that. It was their product. Regulators must've known, too. So all of the pro-vaccination propaganda we were subjected to herded us into a situation where 1 in 35 of us would experience heart damage, and the powers that be wanted it that way. They damaged the hearts of potentially millions of people.
Heart damage isn't the only negative impact of the mRNA vaccines. There's emerging talk of neurological and reproductive harm, though on what scale isn't yet clear. In light of these things, recommending that people get vaccinated and in some cases forcing them to looks more and more like a very serious crime.
The vaccines were safe and effective, we were told. Some people still believe this lie, despite clear evidence to the contrary. Perhaps that's easier than admitting that we were fooled so completely. Now that our economy has been looted by pandemic profiteering and crisis opportunists in government have consolidated their power, it's unlikely anyone will ever be held accountable for the vaccine debacle.
What we can do is prepare for the next big lie from the powers that be. We can ready ourselves to resist any behavioral prescriptions implied by whatever story they try to sell us next. Some have suggested that lies about climate change will be used to manipulate us in the future. Others are worried about the UFO narrative. I'm not so sure.
Read my novels:
- Small Gods of Time Travel is available as a web book on IPFS and as a 41 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt.
- The Paradise Anomaly is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Psychic Avalanche is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- One Man Embassy is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Flying Saucer Shenanigans is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Rainbow Lullaby is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- The Ostermann Method is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
- Blue Dragon Mississippi is available in print via Blurb and for Kindle on Amazon.
See my NFTs:
- Small Gods of Time Travel is a 41 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt that goes with my book by the same name.
- History and the Machine is a 20 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt based on my series of oil paintings of interesting people from history.
- Artifacts of Mind Control is a 15 piece Tezos NFT collection on Objkt based on declassified CIA documents from the MKULTRA program.
I wonder what effect climate change has on the UFOs!
That might be the narrative that finally takes over the world:D
Climate change may simply be terraforming for alien invaders.
Never heard that theory - hilarious!
Dang!
A lot of people also mentioned that the claims about the covid vaccine is not true. They said it is even more dangerous but let's see how it goes.
I didn't take the vaccine though...
Yes it's hard to know what's true these days.
I also believe the shots are very dangerous and should be forbidden.
But to be fair, in this study they measured Troponin levels which is a lab marker. They didn´t find any "injuries" as you wrote, and moreover those lab marker levels were transient. Could well be that in the long term these elevated levels could result in some heart damage, but this was not shown in that paper.
Fair enough. The authors used the language "markers of myocardial injury" but I guess I don't know much about Troponin.
It is a lab test and is correlated in the same way as a positive PCR test is correlated to a virus infection. It can be a true causality, but if the levels are "mild and transient" as they say, it is clearly not the same.
But other studies found a more profound correlation with actual myocarditis, so overall the topic is very real and important and should not be pulled under the carpet.
Interesting. Thanks for the clarification.
Interesting study, and I'm enjoying the comments on this post too! While any study is limiting to an extent, studies like this align with the growing body of anecdotal evidence that people experienced all types of serious injuries after the vaccine, some long-term. I personally know many people injured by the covid vaccine. My 21 year old cousin is an athlete, got a bad case of myocarditis after his first booster, and he still can't run or play basketball without feeling significant chest pain. The cumulative health burden of the boosters is another disturbing consideration.
Being willing to consider the varying results of different vaccine studies is an appropriate use of the precautionary principle, a social responsibility to protect the public from harm where scientific investigation has found a possible risk.
Yet as much as I appreciate the comments below that dissect the wording and technical details of this study, I feel like the overuse of this approach is making us more confused. We can get intellectual about the details within these studies. Or we can practice good sensemaking in the face of these studies, zoom out to the bigger picture and start asking deeper questions. Like why was this larger discussion of vaccines not allowed in mainstream public/media dialogue? Or how many times Big Pharma led the public to believe certain medications were safe and effective? Or the Big Pharma special interests that fund FDA?
Right. It is also telling that this was a European study, and similar American studies are nowhere to be found.
I do think it's important to develop sufficient science literacy to understand the scope of the problems we face with products like the vaccine. Anecdotal evidence can't necessarily tell us if we're looking at a 1 in a million problem or a 1 in 100 problem. This study shows that myocarditis is a 1 in 35 problem. Regardless of the details, knowing the scope of this problem makes it much easier to have productive conversations about it.