America Wants a Symbol, Not a Semiconductor Company

For decades, Intel was Silicon Valley’s crown jewel and probably might still be.
the firm that turned Moore’s Law into a reality and made computing accessible to the masses. Today, instead of making headlines on the latest tech discovery it somehow finds itself in the middle America’s geopolitical theatre.

Donald Trump questioned the integrity of Intel’s CEO hence demanding his resignation one day, then started praising him the next day that tells you everything and nothing.

Intel isn’t being managed like a company it’s being managed like a national mascot. The White House talks about “national security,” SoftBank throws in $2 billion, and the U.S. government bought a 10% stake. Everyone wants a piece of Intel, but no one seems to care about what Intel actually builds.

If one day Intel’s chips fail it's because of poor management. They’re failing because the company is trapped between politics and progress. America doesn’t want a hungry, risk-taking innovator it wants a symbol of “Made in USA” resilience, a corporate flag to wave in the global chip war against Taiwan, Korea, and China.

But symbols don’t innovate. Flags don’t design processors. National mascots don’t beat TSMC or Samsung at their own game. Intel’s danger is not that it will be broken apart, as analysts argue, it’s that it will be hollowed out, fed on subsidies and political vanity, until it becomes a zombie company with too much symbolism and too little science.

If America truly wants Intel to survive, it must stop treating it as a pawn in a power struggle and start treating it as what it once was: a builder, a disruptor, a risk-taker. Because in the chip war, patriotism doesn’t produce processors brains and boldness do.