Monitors and storage of CO2 in saline aquifers.

Monitors and storage of CO2 in saline aquifers.




And if the seabed were used as an invisible vault, not for treasure, but for tons and tons of carbon dioxide captured from the atmosphere, now imagine smart sensors monitoring that vault 24 hours a day detecting any leak, no matter how small, that is the new technological frontier that the United Kingdom is about to inaugurate.


In 2026 a bold mission will begin monitoring the country's first offshore carbon capture and storage site and what it is doing there could become the new global standard in the fight against climate change. British company Sonardyne was chosen to lead this critical operation. It will install smart modules on the seabed equipped with sensors that detect even minimal alterations in water chemistry.


The fully autonomous, battery-powered devices will be connected to an underwater acoustic communication system, allowing data to be transmitted without ever needing to remove the module from the seabed. This monitoring structure will be active for 2 years before CO2 transport and storage actually begins, creating an accurate baseline for future comparisons.

Souce


The sensors incorporated in the modules include technologies such as the Origin 6000 ADCP sonar explosives third-party instruments all integrated by an intelligent processing system called Edge, will be able to accurately identify any gas leak, pressure variation or suspicious chemical alteration in the water around the charcoal device.


The goal is to ensure that the gas remains safely confined within the Endurance saline aquifer located 1000 meters below sea level. This project is not being carried out just for the United Kingdom, it is part of a larger effort called the East Coast Cluster that aims to capture CO2 from the most polluting industrial regions of the country and store it safely under the North Sea.


If it works as expected, the model can be replicated by other countries in search of real solutions to achieve the much-mentioned “net zero”. Rather than storing carbon, the objective is to demonstrate that it is possible to monitor this process in a technologically efficient manner and with total transparency for society and regulatory bodies, but is it safe to bury gas underwater? What if there is a leak?



Souce


The answer lies precisely in continuous surveillance and confidence in the cutting-edge engineering that is being applied. Any failure in the process could compromise the reputation of the project and the environmental security of the region. That is why the choice of Sonardyne and its technologies was strategic. It is a company that is already carbon neutral and has decades of experience in underwater monitoring. However, public acceptance and rigorous oversight will be essential for the initiative to advance with credibility.


We are witnessing the birth of a new way of trying to preserve the planet by burying our emissions in underwater vaults monitored by digital sentinels. The project is ambitious, technological and loaded with responsibility, but will this be the definitive solution to contain the gases that accelerate the warming of our world or are we just pushing the problem under the ocean; you think underwater carbon storage is a smart way out or too risky a bet.





Official website




The images without reference were created with AI
Thank you for visiting my blog. If you like posts about #science, #planet, #politics, #rights #crypto, #traveling and discovering secrets and beauties of the #universe, feel free to Follow me as these are the topics I write about the most. Have a wonderful day and stay on this great platform :) :)


! The truth will set us free and science is the one that is closest to the truth!



Hello friends of the community, if you want to hunt monsters and earn Steem, try the new game HARRY-RAID you just have to enter the game, press PLAY, and show your cards, to hurt monsters.


0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

The problem is that nobody questions this "net zero" religous mantra despite there is also evidence that increase in CO2 is not the cause of the warming but it´s consequence (example). In the past CO2 levels were much higher and plants have thrived without much harm. We are coming out of a cold period so it is normal that it gets hotter.
First of all, mankind can´t influence these long lasting cycles and patterns of cold and warm periods and secondly, most of the suggested ideas (geoengineering) can have terrible side effects.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of course, it is already considered a religion of the official media, I only show what they are planning, who knows what effect the acidification of the seas produces with the incorporation of that CO2 in the marine aquifers, they are like those ideas of blocking the sun from the computer character.

greetings

0
0
0.000
avatar

The majority of historical human interventions in ecosystems have had negative to devastating consequences.
Ecosystems are highly complex networks and must not become a playground for technocrats with delusions of omnipotence!

0
0
0.000
avatar

100% agree with you, we stick to the history that teaches us this and many lessons.

greetings

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).

Consider setting @stemsocial as a beneficiary of this post's rewards if you would like to support the community and contribute to its mission of promoting science and education on Hive. 
 

0
0
0.000