Climate Regulation: Coral Reefs are not Rainforests of the Sea

avatar
(Edited)

When it comes to regulating climate, there is no argument about the huge role that forests play by acting as sinks for carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen to further purify the atmosphere. This is why forests are referred to as the lungs of the earth by some folks. We all know the roles that lungs play in the body of mammals, right?

The lung is an organ in which gaseous exchange takes place. Oxygen is taken in while carbon dioxide is taken out or both gases are simply exchanged for each other. A similar thing also happens with forests during respiration. Forest species take in oxygen for respiration and release carbon dioxide. The huge difference is that trees, and green plants generally, are able to utilize carbon dioxide to produce foods that are broken down during respiration. They also generate oxygen in the process. Thus, they are much more than just lungs.

Among the world's forest layers, the rainforest stands out. Not just because of its carbon sequestration ability but due to its high-level diversity of organisms ranging from plants, animals, to microbes. That is as far as terrestrial ecosystems are concerned. When it comes to aquatic ecosystems, the high diversity of organisms in coral reefs has led to the structures being nicknamed the rainforest of the seas. While the biodiversity comparison might not be debatable for now, there have been huge arguments about whether coral reefs are or can be as important as rainforests in terms of carbon sinks/oxygen production and general regulation of climates.

Coral reefs are formed from the clustered exoskeletons of reef-forming polyps, otherwise known as hard corals. The tiny polyps build exoskeletons by a process known as calcification and are able to survive through a symbiotic association with another organism - the zooxanthellae. The latter are able to photosynthesize and provide food to the hard corals while the calcified exoskeletons of the corals provide secured homes for the zooxanthellae.

A coral reef in its early stage of formation. Peep the polyps! Image source: pixabay

Thus, on the surface, the same process of carbon fixation through photosynthesis and carbon emission through respiration happens in both rainforests and coral reefs. Ipso facto, one would deem it logical that coral reefs are being tagged rainforests of the sea, especially when the biodiversity level of coral reefs is also considered.

The process leading to the formation of the exoskeletons of polyps, however, emits carbon dioxide. The calcium carbonate exoskeleton is formed from the salt water of the sea in a process known as calcification. The entire process can be summarized according to the chemical equation below:

Ca2+ + 2HCO3 ---> CaCO3 + H2O + CO2

It is now left to determine whether the rate of emission is greater than the rate of sequestration or vice versa as far as the coral reef ecosystems are concerned. Usually, for most photosynthetic organisms, positive net primary production is a thing. In other words, the rate at which carbon dioxide is fixed into organic products outweighs the rate at which the organic product is broken down for energy and carbon dioxide.

This means that what differentiates rainforest and coral reefs as far as the metabolism of carbon dioxide is concerned is the extra emission that comes from calcification leading to the formation of the exoskeletons of coral polyps. Whether the extra emission is enough to throw the net primary production of coral reefs to negative remains a subject of research among ecologists. This will effectively indicate whether coral reefs are carbon sources or sinks.

Early findings currently report that coral reefs sequestrate as much carbon dioxide as they give off from respiration and calcification if both the reef flat and the lagoon sides of the geological feature are taken into consideration. If the reef flats are considered in isolation, the net primary productivity is negative while it is positive for the lagoon sides of the coral reefs.

Another thing to consider when comparing rainforests and coral reefs is that coral reefs may store carbon much longer than forests if we consider the rate at which forest trees die, rot/decompose. All in all, everything just points to the fact that coral reefs have their unique characteristics when it comes to carbon economy and their roles in climate regulation might have been misunderstood.

Thank you all for your audience.

Resources

Posted with STEMGeeks



0
0
0.000
18 comments
avatar

This was definitely a topic I had no clue about. Thanks for enlightening my day with some new knowledge! For once, I don't have any meaningful comment to make. Sorry...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Glad to have taught the Prof something. You are most welcome.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nice write up. But I still feel Coral Reefs is the Rainforests of the Sea

0
0
0.000
avatar

Feelings are one thing, reality is another.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Hmmm, that's absolutely right

0
0
0.000
avatar

Rainforests and coral reefs inhale and exhale carbon; carbon really only gets sequestered when it gets buried.

As I understand the deep seas are one of the best places for actual carbon sequestration. But I suspect that it is politically incorrect to even think this thought.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It's what happens when things become politicized.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Both rainforest and coral reefs act as carbon sinks/sources but in variable magnitudes. Coral reefs emit more than they fix. The politicization of climate change would probably be the end of this planet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Off topic, but I was speaking to my brother the other day and he said something about there is a discovery at least every month from rain forests that we never knew before, like organisms, plant life, insects, etc.

Seems they believe there is a theory that there could be possible many natural medicinal cures for disease in the rain forest, along with many deadly viruses waiting to be unleashed.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Your brother is right. Only a small percentage of the world's biodiversity has been identified and properly classified. There are still millions of organisms out there that are totally alien to the knowledge of man. The unfortunate thing is that many of these organisms would have been destroyed by our actions before they can even be identified or put to use. This is why we scientists have been clamoring for our biodiversity to be preserved. They hold the key to our future existence.

0
0
0.000
avatar

or our demise.

0
0
0.000
avatar

our demise because we've destroyed what could save us.

0
0
0.000
avatar

for sure, but also we could also release things and expose ourselves to stuff we don't have immunities to either. Nature has a way of reminding us that we are not in control and it will let us know that with the rain forests eventually.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for your contribution to the STEMsocial community. Feel free to join us on discord to get to know the rest of us!

Please consider delegating to the @stemsocial account (85% of the curation rewards are returned).

You may also include @stemsocial as a beneficiary of the rewards of this post to get a stronger support. 
 

0
0
0.000
avatar

There's a lot of documentaries being made about coral reefs last few years, but I never saw this comparison to rainforests being made I think. It does seem, though, from the attention coral reefs are getting, that they're more in danger than forests are. Or maybe it's just a new thing and people find forests boring now!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think people are just tired of the problems with forests. Also, forests can be created artificially through afforestation programs but coral reefs cannot.

0
0
0.000