RE: NOVELTY. DOES IT REALLY "EXIST"?

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I just used the terms "biochemical" and "hormones" because of you, not because of me. So that you can understand me. But I actually prefer not talking about biochemicals or hormones as those are empty terms for me.

Emotions are not electrochemical interactions, at least not for me. Emotions for you to see are "crying", "laughing", or "sobbing", "giggling", or "frowning", "raging" or "feeling sad" - But electrochemical processes you cannot sense, why altering language to something abstract when the non-abstract tells it directly?

It saddens me. I feel that the world around me wants to be de-humanized and trans-humanized. I don't want to live in this kind of world. I don't understand it...



0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar

It saddens me. I feel that the world around me wants to be de-humanized and trans-humanized. I don't want to live in this kind of world. I don't understand it...

Your immediate, visceral experience of living and breathing is authentic.

At somepoint we will be able to create an artificial (lucid/matrix-style) dream experience.

This will be especially therapeutic for the elderly and the disabled.

This will also undoubtedly be used as a form or entertainment for those who feel trapped in their oppressive tiny lives.

However it will not be the same as what you are feeling now.

It will be like a dream.

That's the difference.

0
0
0.000