Study Suggests Pesticide Companies Withheld Brain Toxicity Studies

avatar

New research suggests that some pesticide companies might have allegedly failed to disclose of studies looking at brain toxicity to EU regulators, even though those same studies apparently had been submitted to regulators in the United States.

There is still ongoing evaluation and it is alleged that regulators made new safety limits after they had been made aware of those research investigations. Some researchers have harshly criticized the omissions and even gone so far as to say that perhaps it is not a rare occurence to see this take place. Without full access to that information they say that there cannot be reliable safety evaluations of those products in the market.

Among the findings they found alleged changes in brain size, along with delayed sexual maturation, and other symptoms like reduced weight gain in offspring for lab animals that had been exposed to the pesticide during pregnancy.

Investigating insecticides:

  • ethoprophos
  • abamectin
  • pyridaben
  • fluazinam

These are some of the insecticides that had allegedly been investigated and they've been used widely on a number of different crops from potatoes to strawberries and more.

Researchers allege that the studies demonstrate that pesticide companies have been fooling EU authorities and it is the people who ultimately are going to pay the price.

Pics:
pixabay
The information that is posted above is not intended to be used as any substitute for professional medical advice, or diagnosis or treatment. The above is posted for informational purposes only.
Sources:
https://phys.org/news/2023-06-firms-withheld-pesticide-toxicity-eu.html



0
0
0.000
1 comments
avatar

"...it is not a rare occurence to see this take place. Without full access to that information they say that there cannot be reliable safety evaluations of those products in the market."

No, such fraud is not uncommon at all. I yesterday dug into PubPeer where I found 55 papers published by Nobel Prize winner Dr. Gregg Semenza that are today being shown to contain falsified data. On retractionwatch.com there are posts defending him, implying the four papers he recently had to retract were simply 'little mistakes'. However, nothing less than grossly unethical intent to deceive caused Dr. Semenza to delete empirical data and insert photoshopped copies of other data in it's place in more than 50 papers.

Fraud is all too common, and has formed the basis for the covid19 jabs. I am sure you recall being told the jabs were perfectly safe, completely effective, and nothing else was, while later discovering the jabs were possibly the most deadly medication ever widely given, didn't do any of the things we expect vaccines to do, and that there were multiple medications such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that were effective and safe.

It is because there is fraud, and sometimes people in positions of power defraud, that we have the Nuremberg Code, which contains the legal requirement in every lawful jurisdiction in the world that people must be availed of informed consent and cannot be forced to participate in medical experiments. In every jurisdiction where complete information regarding ingredients, side effects, and the purpose of a medication was not provided when that medication was mandatory, coerced, or people bribed into taking it, the crime of forced medical experimentation has been committed. If it happened to you, you are a victim of war criminals.

All of us are today.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000