RE: No vaccine will be a silver bullet against all mutations. And as the n ...
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Look for what the Universities are saying around the world though.
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Look for what the Universities are saying around the world though.
I have seen a lot of silly things and blatent propaganda come from Universities.
Posted via D.Buzz
I have seen much more silly things coming from internet conspiracy theorists.
I have seen a lot of silly conspiract theories too lol 😅
But the establishment & Universities are seen as credible sources of info, but sometimes are used for propaganda & misinfo imo.
Posted via D.Buzz
Anyway, the Universities are much more trustworthy than internet conspiracy theorists. That is the point.
Umm, I think it's better to not only point out a specific University, but a specific person in that University . . & not only a specific person, but a specific statement that person said
#NotAllOrNone
Posted via D.Buzz
No I don't follow individual opinions, but the scientific consensus. And the best place to know this is from the renowned Universities around the world.
Well, I guess you don't see that the "consensus" among US Universities has been high-jacked to further a political & global agenda.
But hopefully you use common sense, analyze & think about what you read + see 👍
Posted via D.Buzz
This is the exact narrative of the conspirationists. I don't buy it, at least not to the point of distrusting science and the Universities.
Umm, distrusting "science" is the wrong way to word it.
Science is NOT a list of truths, it's the practice of experimenting & observing the results
If someome tells you what to believe & you believe it since they said it was "science", believing it is NOT science.
Posted via D.Buzz
Science is not the opinion of somebody or even an individual scientist. Science is the scientific consensus.
Umm its not the consensus, it's a method for testing & observing results
https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method
Part of the scientific method is questioning the consensus
If you blindly accept whatever the consensus is, you are not being scientific
Posted via D.Buzz
The consensus is formed using the method. If using the method you cannot contradict the consensus, it gets stronger. The consensus is the culmination, the apex of the method.
Umm, the consensus doesn't always get stronger, sometimes it breaks and scientists discover the consensus was WRONG.
Posted via D.Buzz
It is very rare to a scientific consensus be contradicted. Normally they are just perfected. My advice is to not be on the wrong side. Specially when you are distrusting a scientific consensus to follow internet conspiracy theory. It is definitely not something very smart to do.
Umm, well
There's a scientific consenses AND
There's a Government & #BigTech consensus where no discussion is allowed & anyone that disagrees w/Dr. Fauci is censored off the net, ridiculed, shamed & in the case of well respected scientists, not given air time
Posted via D.Buzz
The "consensus" a.k.a. mainstream narrative of #Covid19 is political/propaganda
Similar to the #WarOnTerror used to invade Middle Eastern countries
Posted via D.Buzz
Oh wait, I see what you mean, I misread it at first.
But there is a lot of people and scientists who contradicted the "Consensus", they are being censored though, and some of them are from Universities, reputable Hospitals, etc.
Posted via D.Buzz
They are not censored, they are refuted using the scientific method. Take for example the intelligent design, the "scientists" that defended it were not censored but completely refuted.
Umm no, check my @dbuzz Profile
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Austin_Fitts
It got censored
Posted via D.Buzz
What it has to do with science? She is not even a scientist.
She is not a scientist but is my most recent example of someone bring censored who went against the mainstream narratives.
Its happened a lot
Posted via D.Buzz
The mainstream narrative is mostly supported by science. You cannot go against scientific consensus without being refuted. It would be immoral.
The "consensus" you are talking about has been refuted & is common sense when you analyze the evidence you are obviously not seeing
i.e. No one has ever isolated the whole virus, yet #BigPharma sells vaccines?
Posted via D.Buzz
Can you watch the first 4 minutes of this?
https://d.buzz/#/@chrisrice/c/3b0k18sf9ba4jn95hiy4xs
Posted via D.Buzz
Videos of iinventor of PCR test (the test used for "diagnosing" Covid) where he:
Calls Dr. Fauci a fraud with an agenda.
Explains that the PCR test is NOT used to diagnose anything and cannot be used for it
Have been repeatedly censored, then referenced incorrectly
Posted via D.Buzz
If you haven't seen respected doctors, researchers & scientists who call mask wearing completely ineffective (in most cases) & unnecessary..
Get censored from the net, you must only tune into the programming of #Mainstream #Media
That video I posted fot deleted w/12 hours
Posted via D.Buzz
Science has nothing to do with individual opinions, but with the consensus. Science is not opinion, it has methods and criteria to follow until it gets to its final conclusions.
Agree with the Government or get censored
Posted via D.Buzz
But btw, I appreciate communicating with you . . These are just my views 😊
Posted via D.Buzz