Scientism is Designed to Close a Box Around Your Mind

MindInBox04.png

Today, Scientism rules the world of ivory towers.
The words of Hawkins, Einstein and Newton are to never be questioned.

To question the holy trinity "of science" is to automatically branded as a kook, a heretic, a pseudo-scientist.
Even worse, if you are actually correct, and start publishing your work, you will be made to disappear.

People go to college and are indoctrinated into the correct way to think about science.
If they question the science, they are told that they just aren't smart enough to understand.

And the worst thing, the most horrifying thing is that new, young scientists are forced to stop thinking. When they get through all of the curriculum, they will have learned a circular logic that is self reinforcing. To think outside of this loop, outside of this box, is almost impossible. The lid has been closed and nailed shut.

- - - - - - -

The unfairness of Inside vs Outside the box thinking

When you are on the inside, all of the theories are bullet proof. The flimsiest of "proofs" are used to uphold the theories. Your papers get published in "peer reviewed" journals. Everything is good.

When you are on the outside, no amount of evidence, explanation, experiments is enough to get your new theories acknowledged. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. That would be great, if that were all. But what that statement really means "anything outside of the box" is an extraordinary claim. And enough evidence is something that a person cannot generate in their lifetime.

Vera Rubin photo archive

Case in point, Vera Rubin discovered that galaxies spin as if all the stars were glued to a plate. The inner stars do not go around the center faster and the further out stars do not go around the center slower. They all have the same rotational velocity. Vera Rubin kept this finding quite for TEN YEARS!!!! After she exposed this finding she faced all kinds of name calling and excommunication.

It wasn't until the invention of "dark matter" would anyone believe the evidence that what was right before their eyes. The holy trinity had to be upheld at all costs. Even at the cost of burying ground breaking evidence.

Today, you look up Vera Rubin and she is "known" for discovering "dark matter". But she did no such thing. She found that galaxies rotated as one unit, like all the stars were glued to a plate. To this day, no one has discovered dark matter. They just keep looking because it has to be there, otherwise Scientism fails.

- - - - - - -

The results of Inside vs Outside the box thinking

Inside the box we have scarcity. Energy is costly. Systems are closed and destructive. It is all random, and our lives are uselessly lived out on a tiny ball, circling a tiny sun in some irrelevant corner of a galaxy.

Outside the box we have abundance. Free energy. Systems working in harmony. There is a guiding force, that lovingly set up a perfectly balanced system, where every piece is important and significant.

If you state it this way, you can see why those who pushed Scientism (look into Rhodes and Rots-children manipulation of universities) make sure any dissenters are marginalized, shut up, and then permanently shut up.

However, today the truth is coming out. But it is slow going.
You can offer an abundance of things that disprove the "Theory of Relativity", but a vast majority of people will brush that off and continue to believe in the handful of pathetic evidence that seems to show that the "Theory of Relativity" is valid. Extraordinary evidence my ass, they are going to wait for the people in the ivory tower (those firmly against change) to change their minds first, then they might look at evidence.

Fortunately, truth is truth, and will stay there.
A future with flying cars and free energy is upon us.
A future where Einstein is thrown in the dust bin and Tesla is set in his place.

It will be glorious... but first the slings and arrows of... owe, owe, ouch, oof, owe

- - - - - - -

All images in this post are my own original creations.



0
0
0.000
22 comments
avatar

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed.

To the modern materialist scientist, all intelligent design has to be abolished.
It is random, chance, a clock running down.

Fortunately, they are wrong.
Entropy doesn't go just one way.

It is obvious when you remove the blinders that modern science classes place upon you.
The evidence is everywhere.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I am dismayed by your obvious fanaticism and lack of objectivity.

You can build a flying car today, in your garage. You will never run one on magical free energy.

Thanks!

0
0
0.000
avatar

stick around, it will be proven shortly.
(as in, it is coming to this world. It is really quite obvious when you get space geometry correct)

But, before then we will have to discuss how magnets work.
and that requires dispelling the Michelson-Morley "experiment" (i use scare quotes because it was not an experiment) so that we can talk about the aether.
Else, all we are left with is talk about the unicorn particles. (current scientific magnet explanation)

The flying cars i speak of seemingly defy gravity.
But that is the thing to work on after understanding magnetism.
We then begin to understand what gravity really is.
(and then Newton, Einstein and Hawkins gets thrown out)
And then we have cars that float in the air, like brick doesn't.

We could have had this all in Tesla's lifetime, but science was forced to follow Einstein, and forever close ourselves off from real science.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Magnets.gif

If you want to understand magnets, read Gibbon.

0
0
0.000
avatar
0
0
0.000
avatar

Researching lodestones at home in the 17th Century, Gibbon ascertained the laws of magnetism over decades of investigation of the properties of lodestones. You may do as you wish, but I am done here.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Do you mean
William Gilbert’s - De magnete (instead of Gibbon?)

It describes how a magnet works.
It doesn't talk about why a magnet works.

Modern Materialistic science believes that unicorn particles attract magnets together. Literally, a particle that is emitted that crashes into the other magnet, and instead of pushing it away like all other particles, it pulls it closer.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Most likely. It has been decades since I read it. While you are correct in that it describes how magnets work and not why they work that way, I submit that is a monumental achievement, and already above our pay grade. Why things are the way they are is a few rungs up that ladder.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

for insight into magnetics I can recommend:

theoria philosophia naturalis by boscovich

here some context :
https://www.nature.com/articles/182230a0.pdf

@builderofcastles @valued-customer


It describes how a magnet works.
It doesn't talk about why a magnet works.

well, science in general only at best describes - , if at all xd

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, Kenneth Wheeler references that book.
Especially when talking about physics.

But Ken's books, and videos go much deeper in depth. Basically discussing magnetism in 3D instead of just 2D
https://ia902209.us.archive.org/32/items/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/user/kathodosdotcom/videos

0
0
0.000
avatar

ah yes - I'm already following him too :D ! also have a few vids by him in my to watch but didnt have time yet :)

0
0
0.000
avatar

good post :) focus on lighting up basic (but important!) information for understanding :)

@tipu curate

0
0
0.000
avatar

It still pains me when I read about how extraordinary of a scientist Tesla was and the little recognition he had during his lifetime and afterwards. Most of his inventions were thrown in the bin because it wasn't aligned with the status quo. It disrupted it in many ways.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Indeed.

However, i must state that a society can only accept so much change.
So, AC electricity was about it.
Thus, from a metaphysical viewpoint, something would happen to deny the rest.

Still, Tesla created the prototypes of just about everything in our modern world.

He had his students focus on changing the public's mind. To open it to future possibilities.
Neither one never actually made anything. (but there is all kinds of theories about that)
Carr got many advertisements about little devices that would power anything from a hearing aid to a factory.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Rightly so. Tesla in some way was ahead of his time. The world was not ready for his inventions. It's great that his prototypes are constantly revisited and sometimes evolved upon.

0
0
0.000