Our Dreams of the Future Are What Guide Us To New Discoveries… Except…
In our future, many dream of flying cars. And so think of finding a method of "anti-gravity".
This is great. This is the way forward, except…
We were trained at an early age that gravity is due to mass. And earth is a big ball of mass.
This causes us to look for an anti-mass, or to find gravity-waves, or a gravity-lens.
What is worse, is that this causes us to discard all of the "anti-gravity" phenomena tha is happening around us. Because, those things are obviously just toys, or some stupid phenomena, a hoax, or a scam. And we know this, because gravity is obviously because of mass, and we know this because the earth is a big ball of dirt.
And thus, we never find "anti-gravity"
How "Gravity" came about
Back in the days of Sir Isaac Newton, people were trying to come up with a theory of gravity. Many people said, they had a way to do so, and many failed. Except, Sir Isaac Newton, who came up with a theory… that was never challenged, because he was the President of The Royal Society.
And his friend Cavendish measured the pull of mass, with some very large gold balls. (he was rich, and mad)
The problem is, this theory doesn't hold water, and no one can even think of how to repeat Cavendish's experiment.
- How do you measure the force of gravity between objects when the force of electrical charge is 10¹⁹ x bigger? And you can't get rid of the charge difference perfectly.
- How can gravity be created by mass of the earth, when it varies, often significantly, between place to place on the earth?
And then the BIGGEST ERROR in science was found. That there wasn't enough mass to hold the galaxy together. It wasn't off by a factor of 10, or 100, it was off by like 10²³.
Instead of reviewing the theory, the physicists came up with dark energy, and dark matter. We must defend Newton! We must defend Einstein!
Anti-gravity phenomena
What is so sad about all of this is we have all of these various things, that show loss of weight, and have nothing to do with mass.
- Capacitors charged to very high voltages lose weight, or charged even higher, float. (See Lifters for an example)
- Tibetan monks held rituals every year where they would levitate and move rocks via sound.
- The infamous Nazi Bell. By using a super-fluid spinning, it could hover.
- Japanese scientists found that gyroscopes spun to high rpms lost weight.
- A entomologist found that beetle wing casings blocked gravity. And so, made a floating platform.
Now, two of these are modern and documented, but all of these have enough veracity to promote investigation.
But, we (modern scientific man) poo-poo all of these because it goes against what we were taught in school.
unlimited energy - perpetual motion machines
Science fiction writers all have some sort of way of making lots of energy.
However, the Modern Materialistic Physicist is taught about the "Laws of Thermodynamics". These are laws, and they are assailed!, they say. Every experiment has proven them!, they say.
But really, when people try to put this to the test, they are forever trying to track down where some energy came from or left to. The energy out vs the energy in never balance.
- If you boil water, and then cool it down, and then boil it again, it takes less energy.
- The rotary hammer heats water at over 100% efficiency.
- Creating eddy currents creates more heat then energy used.
- Creating steam creates more force output then the energy used to boil the water.
- and many other over unity devices.
So, why do the "Laws of Thermodynamics" still exist? Why are they still taught in school?
Because they keep people from looking for perpetual motion machines.
Today we have magnet motors that spin continuously without energy input. Why isn't this THE thing every new scientists works on? Finding a way to improve it? The reason is they are told it will never work.
Even the steam engine has been postulated that it can be made efficient enough, with a compressor, and reboiler to make a perpetual motion machine.
Modern Materialistic Science is what stands between us and a Science Fiction Future.
We are trained so early to never question the teachers. Never question the science. Even in this last covaids scandal, we were told "trust the science", and those who questioned it were called "science deniers". "The Science is settled" was shouted in our faces.
And the few that said, that is not how science is done, were brutally shut down.
We have so much evidence that the basis of our Modern Materialistic Physics books is complete bunk. The evidence is overwhelming. But, hidden away, swept under the rug, and anyone looking at it is excommunicated from society.
The thing that is supposed to be helping humanity most is what is keeping us from the possibilities dreamed of in Science Fiction. And i am disappointed in all science teachers in that they resist throwing out what is wrong. And i am very upset that science teachers argue for what is wrong, destroying any up and coming scientists, that questions anything.
A 300 year old physics book is far more up to date that anything we have today.
A Theory of Natural Philosphy - Roger Joseph Boscovich I suggest any interested find it online and read it.
Congratulations @builderofcastles! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPWe have means of overcoming it now. Better is the enemy of good enough. Flying cars are available right now, you just have to make them yourself because overlords don't want us to have any kind of freedom, but instead want to jam us into warrens of bugpods, 15 minute prisons where we are surveilled 24/7 and are limited to walking, unable to transport goods we can't carry by hand afoot.
Your incapacity to understand actual physics doesn't invalidate it. Your hubris causes you to mischaracterize reality to conform to what your feeble understanding is capable of. Note I do not, as you should know by now, mean that as an insult, because I constantly point out that H. sapiens is evolved to estimate the trajectory of a projectile to down prey so we can hunt, not to comprehend the mysteries of the physical reality comprising the universe. The difference between the potential of humans to grasp reality and the difference between genius and idiocy is simply infinity. This isn't a pejorative about you, but an accurate statement about the absolute impossibility of our tiny little brains to encompass the sum of what can be known, what there is to know, about physics.
This is why I point out that humility is the only sound foundation for scientific understanding. This is also why >60% of peer reviewed research published today isn't reproducible, and isn't actually science because of that. Actual scientific experiments must be reproducible because science is only potential to hypotheses that can be disproved, and you can't disprove a claim you can't reproduce experimentally. Don't confuse the propaganda bought and paid for by banksters to derange science into scientism based on faith and dogma that banksters can use to create the AGW alarmism, for example, to increase their power and wealth, with actual scientific research that can be tested and either potentially true if it isn't disproved, or can be disproved and shown that what is true is whatever subset of hypotheses that haven't been disproved yet.
You are right to be upset that propaganda infests our indoctrinations, but fail to humbly recognize what is propaganda and what isn't because you supplant actual reason - as I incessantly point out in my comments - with faith in insuperable dogma. Conceit isn't confidence. It's the actual opposite of confidence, and based on hubris while real confidence is the product of brutal humility that enables understanding our actual limitations and therefore enables us to know our real capabilities.
Free energy and etc. is just fantasy. The universe is a clockwork. The physical interactions cannot be inaccurate, and we can't grasp the actual metrics, but can only estimate them. We have to dial back our expectation of understanding to what we are actually capable of, and that is a lot less than your projections.
Thanks!
I have 10 years of college in hard sciences. I learned everything.
I later, learned that everything i learned was wrong.
And then, i spent a long time finding what was true.
Do lifters float, like a brick doesn't? Yes, if constructed correctly, and charged to a high enough voltage, the float.
Do gryoscopes spun up to very high RPMs lose weight? Yes they do.
These are repeatable experiments.
I am really sorry that Tibet is gone. So, you cannot go there and see these things. Like floating rocks. And reincarnation.
We in the west only talk about life after death. Where, in Tibet, they know about reincarnation, and have people ascend almost yearly.
Up next in science will be massless objects. Yep, Modern Materialistic Science is going to get a hernia over this.
You prove my point.
I guess i need to be more specific.
I learned everything that was there at college to learn.
But, almost everyone makes the same leap, making me wrong on this end, or that end.
The point I make about human incapacity remains.