Modern Scientists Claim They Know Most Everything, Only By Ignoring All of the Damned…
Modern science claims they know how everything works, leaving only the details to be worked out.
However, this statement can only be made by ignoring so many things. We just take these phenomena and put them in a corner to be ignored.
So, this experiment shows faster than light movement… ignore it
So, an astronomer completes a formula that perfectly 99.9999% describes the orbit of Mercury (as opposed to Einstein's 96%)… make like it never happened
It is the same with archaeology. So many things, such perfect sculptures made with "bronze chisels and a hammer". Objects that were obviously turned on a machine of some sort… these items are ignored.
It is time to start doing real science. And that starts with accepting the data, the facts, all of them.
The Book of the Damned by Charles Fort is a straight up condemnation of modern science.
It is like, "hey, you forgot this, and this, and this", repeated 1000s of times.
How do we even science when we have excluded so much?
There are even branches of thought that are verboten in scientific circles.
So many parts of this book go like this:
Here is something that happened, that puts a big hole in the current theories. Science says it was a fluke, and it probably didn't happen as it was said, and… Then the books goes on and shows, here it happened again, here it happened again, here it happened again, here it happened again…
We really only accept the scientists' narrative because we aren't exposed to all the contradicting data.
Then, you must ask yourself, if there is so much contradicting data, why isn't that in the modern science text books?
Why indeed
A thing i love to bring up is the Michelson-Morley Experiment, where they found SOMETHING and called it NOTHING.
And this NOTHING, that was never found, has not been allowed to be questioned inside the halls of the ivory towers.
If we are doing science, we should explore all the avenues. We must test and retest.
Scientists reinventing the wheel. It should be encouraged.
However, we do not encourage such thought. We tell new scientists that Einstein was much smarter than you. (Although he was actually pretty low on the IQ scale for a scientist) And to never question the great Einstein's formulas. (that are obviously wrong)
We lay a ground work for young scientists that show only one direction that "modern science" can go, and any deviation is verboten. If you go against this, you will be labelled a kook, and black balled.
However, modern science has ignored so many phenomena that it is really only a matter of time before the whole edifice is torn down.
The battle cry of those defending the ivory towers is "Where is your peer-reviewed study?"
Which sounds logical, except that a "peer review" is just a circle jerk.
The peers, in order to become such, have to all believe the same thing. If they deviate at all, they will never be accredited as peers. And so, you will only ever get the party line from this group.
So, "peer reviewed" actually means that this "study" agrees with the current Zeitgeist, and that the math is correct. Peer review does not mean that the test was done correctly, or that the data was analyzed correctly, or even that the test is repeatable.
(There is a big problem in science right now where many tests are being found to not be repeatable. Especially in psychology. Way to let us down peer-reviewers)
I highly recommend reading The Book of the Damned even if all you understand is the enormity of what modern science has swept under the rug.
To go forward in science, we are going to have to take a huge step back. We need to question everything. Especially all the "greats" Newton, Einstein, Hawkins…
At minimum, we have let errors creep in. On the other end, there is evidence that a group of people have f*cked with science so that we will never actually know anything.
Reading the book of the damned will place you on solid footing about how much is just ignored by modern science. It isn't a few things, it is more like the corner (that is ignored) of the room contains 90% of reality. The rest of the room is barren and sterile. Containing only a few, computer generated, mathematical models. (meaning they have nothing to do with reality)
Lastly i will say, many people will think, "but we do all of these modern wonders with science", and i will respond that that isn't science, it is engineering. And that is just doing what works. And what works is often a direct affront to modern science.
Here is a free copy.
Thanks for providing a link
Doesn't exist, anymore than government exists, and in fact a lot less so. Whenever government builds a road, taxes you, or otherwise tramples your rights, there's actually some group of people that actually take the actions. Some guy driving an asphalt machine, some guys with shovels, another driving a steam roller, all working for a contractor kicking back monies to some bureaucrat actually build the road.
Same with science. Some guy with grant monies is 'modern science'. The retards claiming that ~98% of the universe is dark energy and dark matter don't know WTF they're talking about anymore than your state representative built an inch of the roads he claims he did.
IMG source - Frontiersin.org
Above is an illustration from a peer reviewed paper spouting absolute gibberish published in Frontiers in Science. Click the link to read their feeble excuse in the retraction of the paper after the ginormous rat penis pic made the rounds of the meme wars. Scientific research has been so degraded by funding seeking specific results and paying for bias for political purposes that the majority of papers published are as factual and meaningful as the image above. That's not an exaggeration. It's well over half the scientific papers published today that make insuperable claims, based on fallacious data from irrepeatable experiments, or worse, PCA plots or statistical models that lack any firm relation to reality.
This does not reflect on Newton or Einsteinian models, which do have some relation to the actual physical reality we live in. They aren't perfect, and we will never have a scientific model of the universe that is, because we can't handle the truth. Again, not an exaggeration. We're pitifully tiny things, with infinitesimally small, gross bags of neural networks with which we are able to parse things, evolved to guestimate the trajectory of rocks and stuff flung at fleeing prey in the hope of occasionally dining. We aren't made to be competent to understand physical reality, and it's absurd to think we can.
However, grad students don't understand this fact very well, having never flung anything at fleeing prey and thereby securing their dinner. They're pretty impressed with themselves, and don't feel absurd at all discussing eldritch principles or marking arcane symbols on whiteboards as they work on their spellcraft. They're really proud of how wise and smart they are, which is a sign of their stupidity and foolishness.
Hubris is a curse of the academic. As you point out, humility is the foundation of all understanding, and knowing how much we don't know isn't even possible, so knowing we don't know anything that is actually fully correct is the only proper scientific understanding actually smart people should have. That doesn't mean people muffed their calculations, or made errors in the math. It means there's so much we don't perceive and can't conceive that has bearing on the few things we do perceive and conceive that such understanding as we do have cannot be other than flawed and inaccurate.
However, it's close enough for rocket science, usually.
Thanks!
I watched this video today that is one of the best examples to show off how pyramids were built by technologies far above our current understanding. There is nothing to prove with peer reviewed papers about pyramids being built with more advanced technology than what we have. We don't even need conspiracy theories for it. A simple observation of real world events is sufficient for the job.
When you have time, take a look at the maps that Europeans made around the time of Fall of Constantinople. A great deal of ancient knowledge was leaked to the world at that time. I'm talking about knowledge that should predate even the Romans by thousands of years.
So much of history has been rewritten/obscured, that we really do not know when or where we are.
And most people cannot cognize that we cannot move the stones that they built the pyramids with. With all our trucks and our big cranes, we still can't. But people do not believe that.
They still have the idea that they were rolled on logs. (logs do not carry that weight)
And there are so many pieces of ancient things, that boggle the mind about how they were constructed.
Then we have ancient texts that describe how to make flying machines (not like we make them)
So much of our history is gone.