How Long Before Modern Materialistic Science Admits It Was Wrong?
The "Laws" of Thermodynamics are wrong, have been wrong, disproven, and should have been thrown out long ago.
When will Modern Materialistic Scientists admit this?
The longer they wait, the more stupid they will look. Things are coming that will PROVE to the average guy on the street that free energy devices exist, and blam, there goes their "laws".
My bet is that they will never admit that they were wrong, and that them, and all their text books, will be summarily thrown in the garbage bin.
Disproofs of the "Laws" of Thermodynamics
There exists many over-unity devices. You put 100% energy into a rotary-water-hammer, you get 105% hot water. Q.E.D. the "laws" are busted. What? They are not?
Even the lowly steam engine outputs more power than is required to boil the water.
An electron cascade puts out more energy than what it takes to cause the chain reaction.
Maxwell's equations show that energy can come through from higher dimensions (disproving the laws) and they could have that, so Maxwell's equations were change to Heaviside's simplified equations, in his own book.
The lowly refrigerator magnet is doing continuous work. If you held your child's drawing to the refrigerator you would start sweating, and then shaking, and soon you will collapse. That is work that is being performed. And it is continuous work.
And someday soon, we will have free-energy devices. QED. The "laws" of Thermodynamics are dead, and everyone will know it.
Modern Materialistic Science has to prove God doesn't exist, and the universe is dead
This is the root of everything that is wrong with Modern Materialistic Science. It HAS TO BE without God. And a corollary of that, is that the universe is dead.
I can comprehend why a scientist would want to work out everything in a way, that it doesn't matter if God exists, but they are specifically, and vehemently so, against ever admitting that there is a creator.
Take Intelligent Design. It is quite an interesting theory, and one that can't be easily dismissed. However, Modern Materialistic Science declares it verboten to discuss in the halls of the ivory towers. Unfortunately, macro-evolution has been disproven by mathematics. It would take longer than the universe has been around for humans to develop by random mutation.
The big bang… they have done everything they can to make sure it all happens without a creator being present. Except where something comes out of nothing. Modern Science says, "Just give us one miracle, and we will explain the rest." Fortunately, the big bang is about to be placed in the rubbish heap as we watch a new galaxy being formed. It should already be there because as astronomers 3D plot our galaxy, they find it does not look anything like what a random dispersal of material would ever form.
If you talk to a yogi, or any deeply spiritual person, they will say that the whole universe is alive, aware and connected. This is the opposite of Modern Materialistic Science, where it is dead, dying and heading towards the Big Crunch. As people become more spiritual, they will all realize this to. And, thus the end of Modern Materialistic Science.
Can Modern Materialistic Science admit they are wrong?
As evidence piles higher and higher showing that even the basis of modern science is wrong, what will the hierophants of the ivory towers do? Will they break down and admit they were wrong? Will they promise to do better in the future?
Or will they hold the line, excommunicating anyone who breaks ranks with them?
Archeologists are currently burying anything that would question the modern paradigm.
Astronomers are denying what they see in their telescopes.
Physicists are coming up with more and more outlandish explanations to keep believing in Einstein.
Anthropologists are still looking for the missing chain.
Anything, and everything to avoid admitting that they are/were wrong.
On the other hand, if they do admit that they were wrong, will anyone believe them ever again? What would you do if big-name-scientists got on TV and pointed to the science text book and said, everything in here is wrong?
So far, the ivory towers will not admit that they have been spreading lies. And it is looking like they will never do so. And, well, to do so would mean that they will probably never be important or influential in their lives again.
You cannot instantly heal over a century of lies and misdirection. Even those scientists who want to know the truth will find it hard to forget what they knew, and learn everything anew.
Unfortunately for them, the hour of reckoning is at hand. We will soon see free-energy devices. And this disproves the "Laws" of Thermodynamics. The house of cards falls down.
I hope that we just throw away the old text books and start afresh, putting our energy in finding out the truths, coming up with new theories, and avoiding the pit-traps of defending the indefensible.
However, i believe there will be a lot of anger that has to be worked out first. How does one deal with all that schooling being a lie?
The fridge magnet bit grabbed me. Holding a paper still under a constant field is not continuous work, because work needs motion, so the magnet is not feeding enerrgy into the system the way a battery would. If magnets were tiny workers, mine would demand a coffee break. If it were doing steady work, it would heat up or fade fast, and that matches thermo;dynamics as tested in many engines, so that example weakens teh case.
The magnet is not attached to the refrigerator. Thus it is resisting gravity every moment. And that is work. Of course, modern science gets around this buy saying there is no movement. But, that is just in one frame of reference.
And then, out comes magnet motors. Things that spin by the power of magnetic force of permanent magnets.
Resisting gravity without moving isn't wrok. Work needs force and displacement, and a static magnet has zero of that over time in any frame you pick. If something spins, where's the energy coming from, because it's not from < permanent magnet magic. Magnets don't do continuous power by themselves and every claimed magnet motor either sneaks in input or stalls once losses catch up, teh basic thermodynamics still holds.
Yep, that is what Modern Materialistic Science says, but it isn't true. There are magnet motors now, they just don't have enough torque to produce useful work. But, that will be solved soon.
Hope is cool, but a static magnetic field doing no work at zero motion still holds. If a magnet motor can't beat friction and losses, there's no net work. Do you have measured toruqe and and rpm against any inputs? Show a continuous output above all inputs, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong.
On work, is a table doing work holding stuff up off the floor? According to one view, no. According to another view, yes. The weight on the table is causing strain throughout the structure, but it is also not moving so it is not causing heat buildup (that we can feel), however, at any moment, you may find the table bursts into pieces and the stuff is now on the floor.
On magnets, the field is not static. Tesla said that his discovery of the rotating magnetic field is his most important ever.
Our problem is that we like to make things balanced, so much so that we don't really have good ideas of imbalance, or a continuous imbalance. This is the secret to magnet motors and later, free-energy devices. Today, the magnet motors are perpetual motion machines, little anomalies. They continue to spin years later.
If i create a magnet motor, i will only tell people about it after i get useful work out of it, and then i will tell EVERYONE how to build it as fast as possible.
Congratulations @builderofcastles! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP