RE: 📈📊 'neoxian' Weekly ( Mar 13, 2021 to Mar 19, 2021 ) stat report 📊📈
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
173 posts? that seems a little fishy?
0
0
0.000
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
173 posts? that seems a little fishy?
Hello There,
I pulled these details using Hive api, Maybe some is working really hard 😂🤣
I checked the account and this guys is posting very frequently, maybe he is a robot
Thanks for stopping by
I'm not a robot ... although I suspect a robot could say that, hahaha
Anyway, if an Artificial Intelligence could lie convincingly, then it would be quite human.
Certainly I publish with high frequency, I never keep track of how much I publish, I had not noticed that I had almost 200 publications ... it's like a lot. Anyway, I post things that I like and I'm very introverted in my everyday offline life, so I guess posting so much will be a psychological compensation mechanism or something like that.
i was surprised to see the number of posts.
Thanks a lot for for clarifying the confusion.
And we were just joking about you being a Robot.
I have a new title - a super human whose power is writing ?
This looks more appropriate
Good luck with publishing 👍👍
That would be funny, anyway, I think there are Instagram or twitter accounts with more weekly posts than me, hahaha, be well and have a good day.
Here is some luv for your engagement and contribution.
!LUV 1
Thanks
Hey @pedrobrito2004, you were just shared some LUV. :) With at least 5 LUV in your wallet, you can give up to 3 LUV per day, for free. See the LUV tokens in your wallet at https://hive-engine.com or learn about LUV at https://peakd.com/@luvshares
Certainly, recently a colleague on the blockchain gave me a shower of negative votes because I post a lot and he suspected it was spam, but it turns out that when I asked him if it was something that I had done wrong, he confessed that he had not read my publications nor had he reviewed the content of my post, he simply thought that since I published a lot it must be spam and deserved to be punished with negative votes ... well, it was good that we could clarify it and that he saw that I had no repeated content in my publications, Besides, I admit that I annoyed him a bit to remove the negative votes, after enduring my annoyance for three days and seeing that he had really been wrong, he was very kind and withdrew the negative votes.
I really hope that in the future you read the publications before giving negative votes, because it is very hurtful that they give negative votes to the publications for free, at least I would like it to have a good reason.
That's a painful experience,
You put a lot of effort in creating this content and someone give it a negative vote without even reading it is really disheartening.
sorry to hear that.
True, it hurt, but by communicating we were able to clarify it and solve the problem.
I am glad that this was resolved in the end. Take care