"...Hivewatchers, in violation of their dao proposal, and in violation of federal law, has used their bots to blacklist me for their political and personal interest."
His initial complaint was about visibility.
That has been solved for, he sets his rewards to burn, and hw's doesn't ding him for spam.
It never was political.
I think you misunderstand his meaning. I took it to mean causing them to leave the platform because of deliberately and punitively taxing their content. Also, making the content require clicking to reveal it disables certain automated uses.
Many things HW does are intended to produce emotional responses. HW does appear to be a mechanism intended to reduce Hive's user base. That has certainly been it's consequence. Enabling automation of data recording isn't spamming. I don't find any points of agreement with HW on this matter.
Also, the third sentence would be the secondary, or even tertiary complaint, since it followed the text I have quoted that also contained complaints. I think we will continue to disagree on this, and I don't think either of us will convince the other of our views, so I will find something else to do.
The one you say you don't understand.
!lolz, his posts are accessible, always have been.
lolztoken.com
The letter H
Credit: reddit
@valued-customer, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of antisocialist
(1/8)
Delegate Hive Tokens to Farm $LOLZ and earn 110% Rewards. Learn more.
How is
Complaining about the posts being accessible?
His initial complaint was about visibility.
That has been solved for, he sets his rewards to burn, and hw's doesn't ding him for spam.
It never was political.
Where was that initial complaint? This is the one I have seen, and that you were replying to.
3rd sentence.
He wasn't targeted for anything, but spam.
But, he misunderstood that, and reacted emotionally.
I think you misunderstand his meaning. I took it to mean causing them to leave the platform because of deliberately and punitively taxing their content. Also, making the content require clicking to reveal it disables certain automated uses.
Many things HW does are intended to produce emotional responses. HW does appear to be a mechanism intended to reduce Hive's user base. That has certainly been it's consequence. Enabling automation of data recording isn't spamming. I don't find any points of agreement with HW on this matter.
Also, the third sentence would be the secondary, or even tertiary complaint, since it followed the text I have quoted that also contained complaints. I think we will continue to disagree on this, and I don't think either of us will convince the other of our views, so I will find something else to do.