RE: Gravity Doesn't Exist
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Not sure if You recall (or were even aware) that I advocate for electrogravitics to be unhidden. Given it allows gravity control, it's pretty clear gravity is not what the einsteinians want Us to think it is. LOL! I'm a lavioletteian... I support the work of the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette - subquantum kinetics (SQK), which predicts all the "mysteries" of the einsteinian bunk (like the Biefeld-Brown effect), needs no "renormalizations" and ad hoc things like "dark matter" and "dark energy" to explain things, and... Is euclidean! No "bending of spacetime.
In that view, gravity, as I mentioned, is a force, with both negative and positive elements that nearly, but not quite, cancel one another out, leaving the appearance that it is a "weak" force.
In case I have not offered:
SQK: https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
Electrogravitics PDF: https://starburstfound.org/downloads/aerospace/NASA-SEOP.pdf
And:
Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of-free-energy
One big problem is that the universe is non-euclidian. The only thing that Einstein got right is that the universe is curved.
The right hand rule of electricity is Electricity - Magnetism - Force. That force is probably what we feel as gravity.
There is a right h and rule of aether, and we really need to know both in order to understand energy.
I dispute that the universe is bent. What brings You to that conclusion? SQK explains why things behave as they do without the need to bend things.
As for the rest, likely!
Ummm, you know the shape of a magnetic field?
You know the shape of a human aura?
This shape is repeated throughout the universe.
Yes. But I don't see how that leads to "...the universe is non-euclidian. The only thing that Einstein got right is that the universe is curved."